General Practice/Family Medicine Research During the Pandemic: Showing The Links to the EGPRN Research Strategy

C. Collins, Davorina Petek, Esperanza Diaz, M. Muñoz
{"title":"General Practice/Family Medicine Research During the Pandemic: Showing The Links to the EGPRN Research Strategy","authors":"C. Collins, Davorina Petek, Esperanza Diaz, M. Muñoz","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2022110101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"General Practice/Family Medicine is at the forefront of the clinical response to the COVID-19 crisis just as it is known to be a critical component of healthcare systems globally. \n\nA large number of COVID-19 related papers have been published and dedicated funding calls were available in many countries and across the European Union. However, General Practice/Family Medicine does not feature as strongly as it should in COVID-19 high impact publications or successful funding applications. \n\nIn this paper, we take a look at the findings on which the recommendations of the “European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) Research Strategy for General Practice in Europe 2021” are based and highlight how these align with the COVID-19 experience of General Practice/Family research. \n\nTo elaborate on this, the issues identified and the recommendations of the EGPRN Research Strategy are grouped into three broad areas on which we need to focus – capacity, collaboration, and complexity (3-Cs). \n\nApparent or presumed deficiencies in these 3-Cs are possibly why the General Practice/Family research impact during COVID-19 does not match its position on the ground in fighting the pandemic and supporting patients. The EGPRN Research Strategy identifies how we might work to position ourselves better in the future and gain the recognition deserved, in terms of publications, research funding, and prominence.\n\nKeywords: general practice, research, pandemics, publications, financing","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2022110101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

General Practice/Family Medicine is at the forefront of the clinical response to the COVID-19 crisis just as it is known to be a critical component of healthcare systems globally. A large number of COVID-19 related papers have been published and dedicated funding calls were available in many countries and across the European Union. However, General Practice/Family Medicine does not feature as strongly as it should in COVID-19 high impact publications or successful funding applications. In this paper, we take a look at the findings on which the recommendations of the “European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) Research Strategy for General Practice in Europe 2021” are based and highlight how these align with the COVID-19 experience of General Practice/Family research. To elaborate on this, the issues identified and the recommendations of the EGPRN Research Strategy are grouped into three broad areas on which we need to focus – capacity, collaboration, and complexity (3-Cs). Apparent or presumed deficiencies in these 3-Cs are possibly why the General Practice/Family research impact during COVID-19 does not match its position on the ground in fighting the pandemic and supporting patients. The EGPRN Research Strategy identifies how we might work to position ourselves better in the future and gain the recognition deserved, in terms of publications, research funding, and prominence. Keywords: general practice, research, pandemics, publications, financing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大流行期间的全科医学/家庭医学研究:显示与EGPRN研究战略的联系
全科医生/家庭医学处于临床应对COVID-19危机的最前沿,因为它是全球卫生保健系统的关键组成部分。许多国家和整个欧盟发表了大量与COVID-19相关的论文,并发出了专门的筹资呼吁。然而,全科医学/家庭医学在2019冠状病毒病高影响力出版物或成功的资助申请中并没有得到应有的重视。在本文中,我们研究了“欧洲全科医学研究网络(EGPRN) 2021年欧洲全科医学研究战略”建议所依据的研究结果,并强调了这些结果如何与全科医学/家庭研究的COVID-19经验相一致。为了详细说明这一点,EGPRN研究战略确定的问题和建议被分为我们需要关注的三个广泛领域——能力、协作和复杂性(3c)。这3- c方面明显的或假定的缺陷可能是为什么在COVID-19期间全科医生/家庭研究的影响与其在抗击大流行和支持患者方面的立场不匹配的原因。EGPRN研究战略确定了我们如何在未来更好地定位自己,并在出版物,研究资金和突出地位方面获得应有的认可。关键词:全科实践、研究、流行病、出版物、融资
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Three Methods, “Pap Smear, Conization and LEEP” in Women with Abnormal Pap Smear: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analytical Study Evaluation of Misbeliefs, Myths and Knowledge About Nevi and Skin Cancer in Dermatology Patients Breastfeeding Problems of Mothers in the Postpartum Period and Impact on Sleep Quality The Relationship of Pain Sensitivity and Severity with Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain The Relationship Between Parents’ Health Literacy Levels and Their Attitudes Towards Human Papillomavirus Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1