Europe and Euroscepticism on Twitter During the 2019 European Parliament Elections

Guillermo López-García, Germán Llorca-Abad, V. Fenoll, A. Pop, Jose Gamir-Ríos
{"title":"Europe and Euroscepticism on Twitter During the 2019 European Parliament Elections","authors":"Guillermo López-García, Germán Llorca-Abad, V. Fenoll, A. Pop, Jose Gamir-Ríos","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to analyse the activity on Twitter of the eight main candidates who stood in the 2019 European election in Spain. The analysis was developed throughout the electoral campaign and established based on two methodological perspectives. First, the content analysis allowed to observe which topics each candidate spoke about and from which perspective (pro-European or Eurosceptic). Second, the discourse analysis allowed to further explore the political communication strategies developed. This analysis is based on two hypotheses. The first (H1) is that European issues and approaches will not be a priority in candidates' discourses for the European Parliament, given the context of political polarisation in Spain and the fact that these elections can be read as a second round for the April 2019 general election. The second (H2) is that Euroscepticism will have a marginal presence in candidates' messages. The results confirm H2 but reject H1.","PeriodicalId":121894,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Politics, Communication, and the Impact on Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8057-8.ch010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse the activity on Twitter of the eight main candidates who stood in the 2019 European election in Spain. The analysis was developed throughout the electoral campaign and established based on two methodological perspectives. First, the content analysis allowed to observe which topics each candidate spoke about and from which perspective (pro-European or Eurosceptic). Second, the discourse analysis allowed to further explore the political communication strategies developed. This analysis is based on two hypotheses. The first (H1) is that European issues and approaches will not be a priority in candidates' discourses for the European Parliament, given the context of political polarisation in Spain and the fact that these elections can be read as a second round for the April 2019 general election. The second (H2) is that Euroscepticism will have a marginal presence in candidates' messages. The results confirm H2 but reject H1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019年欧洲议会选举期间推特上的欧洲和欧洲怀疑主义
本研究的目的是分析参加2019年西班牙欧洲选举的八位主要候选人在Twitter上的活动。这项分析是在整个竞选活动中发展起来的,并以两种方法观点为基础。首先,内容分析允许观察每个候选人谈论的话题以及从哪个角度(亲欧派或疑欧派)。其次,话语分析可以进一步探讨政治传播策略的发展。这一分析基于两个假设。第一个(H1)是,考虑到西班牙政治两极分化的背景,以及这些选举可以被解读为2019年4月大选的第二轮,欧洲问题和方法将不会成为欧洲议会候选人话语中的优先事项。第二个(H2)是,欧洲怀疑主义将在候选人的信息中处于边缘地位。结果证实了H2,但否定了H1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Placing Portuguese Right-Wing Populism Into Context Citizens' Political Discourses on Climate Change and Vaccines Will Live Streaming Platforms and Influencers Consolidate or Disrupt Democracy? Citizens, Polarization, and the Pandemic in the Italian Hybrid News Media System Populism, Its Prevalence, and Its Negative Influence on Democratic Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1