Aspirational Sovereignty and Human Rights Advocacy

S. Friedman
{"title":"Aspirational Sovereignty and Human Rights Advocacy","authors":"S. Friedman","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501755736.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses the concept of “aspirational sovereignty” to explore how the Taiwanese state enacts and projects sovereignty claims through everyday governing practices. As a vibrant democracy that enjoys formal diplomatic recognition from a shrinking number of states and informal recognition from many others, Taiwan operates in a contested international domain where any act that suggests official sovereign standing is quickly challenged or blocked by the PRC (People's Republic of China) government, which continues to claim Taiwan as a renegade province. The chapter examines how different political logics and governing practices generate recognizable and recognized sovereignty for Taiwan, with a particular focus on governmental and civil society responses to cross-border migration flows. It focuses not on immigrants themselves, but instead on specific groups, individuals, and institutions that form around immigrants: the bureaucrats and officials charged with managing migration flows and activists and other public figures who organize and speak publicly in support of human rights, especially immigrant rights. In different ways, these groups enact and demand a particular kind of Taiwanese state, one that they argue best serves a specific vision of an international community that includes a sovereign Taiwan in its midst.","PeriodicalId":384140,"journal":{"name":"The Everyday Lives of Sovereignty","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Everyday Lives of Sovereignty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501755736.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter assesses the concept of “aspirational sovereignty” to explore how the Taiwanese state enacts and projects sovereignty claims through everyday governing practices. As a vibrant democracy that enjoys formal diplomatic recognition from a shrinking number of states and informal recognition from many others, Taiwan operates in a contested international domain where any act that suggests official sovereign standing is quickly challenged or blocked by the PRC (People's Republic of China) government, which continues to claim Taiwan as a renegade province. The chapter examines how different political logics and governing practices generate recognizable and recognized sovereignty for Taiwan, with a particular focus on governmental and civil society responses to cross-border migration flows. It focuses not on immigrants themselves, but instead on specific groups, individuals, and institutions that form around immigrants: the bureaucrats and officials charged with managing migration flows and activists and other public figures who organize and speak publicly in support of human rights, especially immigrant rights. In different ways, these groups enact and demand a particular kind of Taiwanese state, one that they argue best serves a specific vision of an international community that includes a sovereign Taiwan in its midst.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渴望主权与人权倡导
本章评估“期望主权”的概念,以探讨台湾国家如何通过日常治理实践制定和实施主权主张。作为一个充满活力的民主国家,台湾享有越来越少的国家的正式外交承认和许多其他国家的非正式承认,台湾在一个有争议的国际领域运作,任何表明官方主权地位的行为都会迅速受到中华人民共和国政府的挑战或阻止,中华人民共和国政府继续声称台湾是一个叛离的省份。本章探讨了不同的政治逻辑和治理实践如何为台湾产生公认的和公认的主权,并特别关注政府和民间社会对跨境移民流动的反应。它关注的不是移民本身,而是围绕移民形成的特定群体、个人和机构:负责管理移民流动的官僚和官员,以及组织和公开发言支持人权,特别是移民权利的活动家和其他公众人物。这些团体以不同的方式制定和要求一种特定的台湾国家,他们认为这种国家最适合于一个包括主权台湾在内的国际社会的特定愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sovereignty in the Skies 4. Aspirational Sovereignty and Human Rights Advocacy: Audience, Recognition, and the Reach of the Taiwan Epilogue 1. Sovereignty in the Skies: An Anthropology of Everyday Aeropolitics 3. “Because I Have a Hookup”: Cheating Citizens and the Unbearable State in Post-Dayton Bosnia-Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1