Climate, Insurance, and Innovation: The Case of U.S. Agriculture

R. Miao
{"title":"Climate, Insurance, and Innovation: The Case of U.S. Agriculture","authors":"R. Miao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3154058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation and insurance are two important options for the agricultural sector to adapt to climate change. However, how these two options interact with each other has not been documented in the literature. This paper intends to fill this gap by investigating the effects of crop insurance on agricultural innovation in the context of climate change. We first develop a conceptual framework that models the effects of climatic risk and crop insurance on farmers’ demand for innovations, from which the market equilibrium of innovations is then derived while holding the supply curve constant. Hypotheses developed under the conceptual framework are tested by using data for agricultural innovation, climate, and crop insurance associated with ten major field crops in the United States over 1980-2013. We estimate a Poisson fixed effects model via Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) approach to address the issue of non-strict exogeneity of regressors. We find empirical evidence that the U.S. agricultural sector responds to climate change by increasing innovation activities; but the response is weakened by heavily subsidized crop insurance programs by about 23.3%. This indicates that crop insurance may have an unintended crowding out effect as an option to adapt to climate change and may inhibit societies’ capacity to adapt to climate change in the long-run. Such an effect may also exist under flood and earthquake insurance because similar to crop insurance, these two types of insurance act as alternative risk management options to risk-mitigating innovations.","PeriodicalId":296234,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Innovation and insurance are two important options for the agricultural sector to adapt to climate change. However, how these two options interact with each other has not been documented in the literature. This paper intends to fill this gap by investigating the effects of crop insurance on agricultural innovation in the context of climate change. We first develop a conceptual framework that models the effects of climatic risk and crop insurance on farmers’ demand for innovations, from which the market equilibrium of innovations is then derived while holding the supply curve constant. Hypotheses developed under the conceptual framework are tested by using data for agricultural innovation, climate, and crop insurance associated with ten major field crops in the United States over 1980-2013. We estimate a Poisson fixed effects model via Generalized Methods of Moments (GMM) approach to address the issue of non-strict exogeneity of regressors. We find empirical evidence that the U.S. agricultural sector responds to climate change by increasing innovation activities; but the response is weakened by heavily subsidized crop insurance programs by about 23.3%. This indicates that crop insurance may have an unintended crowding out effect as an option to adapt to climate change and may inhibit societies’ capacity to adapt to climate change in the long-run. Such an effect may also exist under flood and earthquake insurance because similar to crop insurance, these two types of insurance act as alternative risk management options to risk-mitigating innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候、保险和创新:以美国农业为例
创新和保险是农业部门适应气候变化的两个重要选择。然而,这两种选择如何相互作用还没有在文献中记录。本文拟通过研究气候变化背景下作物保险对农业创新的影响来填补这一空白。我们首先建立了一个概念框架,对气候风险和作物保险对农民创新需求的影响进行建模,然后在保持供给曲线不变的情况下推导出创新的市场均衡。通过使用1980-2013年间美国10种主要大田作物的农业创新、气候和作物保险数据,对在概念框架下提出的假设进行了检验。我们通过广义矩量方法(GMM)估计泊松固定效应模型,以解决回归量的非严格外生性问题。我们发现经验证据表明,美国农业部门通过增加创新活动来应对气候变化;但由于大量补贴的农作物保险项目,这种反应被削弱了约23.3%。这表明,作为适应气候变化的一种选择,作物保险可能会产生意想不到的挤出效应,并可能从长远来看抑制社会适应气候变化的能力。这种效应也可能存在于洪水和地震保险中,因为与作物保险类似,这两种类型的保险作为风险缓解创新的替代风险管理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green Finance: A Step closer to Sustainable Development Enhancing Tribal Land Tenure Security in Odisha: Otelp- Landesa Partnership Lassen Sich Haltelinien, Finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit Und Generationenge-Rechtigkeit Trotz Der Corona-Pandemie Miteinander Verbinden? (Can Stop Lines, Financial Sustainability and Generational Equity Be Combined Despite the Corona Pandemic?) Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Bangladesh: Organizational Gap Analysis- Case Study on Ministry of Housing and Public Works Livelihood Sustainability Status and Challenges of South-western Coastal Area of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1