The Language of the Besermians in the Light of the Historical Communication Processes of the Peoples of the Volga-Urals Region

E. V. Robustova, N.M. Liukina
{"title":"The Language of the Besermians in the Light of the Historical Communication Processes of the Peoples of the Volga-Urals Region","authors":"E. V. Robustova, N.M. Liukina","doi":"10.17759/langt.2021080208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the linguistic aspects of the \"Bessermian problem\", the essence of which lies in the debatability of the question of the Bessermian ethnogenesis, namely about either the Turkic or Finno-Ugric origin of the Bessermian ethnos, whose history, unfolding during the last centuries on the territory of the Urals region, has no written sources and is little-studied. The interest to this problem stems from the studies of historical migrations of the peoples who constituted the population of Volga Bulgaria, a powerful state formation, which ceased to exist during the Mongol-Tatar conquests, and clarification of the historical fate of the people, recorded in a number of medieval sources under the designation \"Beserm'en\". In the connection with the attempts to verify the hypothesis, allowing to consider Bessermians as \"direct descendants of the Kama Bulgars\", the materials collected by the researchers of Bessermian language in the late 19th century, as well as in the 20th – early 21st centuries, were updated and subjected to the scientific-historical consideration, where the comparison of Bessermian dialect with Chuvash language, scientifically recognized as the only living language of Bulgar (or Oghur) group of the Turkish languages, was made. On the basis of the historiographical analysis the conclusion is made: despite the fact that at present Besermians are referred to small Finno-Ugrian groups, the question of their identification with the autochthonous Finno-Ugrian.","PeriodicalId":414200,"journal":{"name":"Язык и текст","volume":"151 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Язык и текст","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2021080208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article considers the linguistic aspects of the "Bessermian problem", the essence of which lies in the debatability of the question of the Bessermian ethnogenesis, namely about either the Turkic or Finno-Ugric origin of the Bessermian ethnos, whose history, unfolding during the last centuries on the territory of the Urals region, has no written sources and is little-studied. The interest to this problem stems from the studies of historical migrations of the peoples who constituted the population of Volga Bulgaria, a powerful state formation, which ceased to exist during the Mongol-Tatar conquests, and clarification of the historical fate of the people, recorded in a number of medieval sources under the designation "Beserm'en". In the connection with the attempts to verify the hypothesis, allowing to consider Bessermians as "direct descendants of the Kama Bulgars", the materials collected by the researchers of Bessermian language in the late 19th century, as well as in the 20th – early 21st centuries, were updated and subjected to the scientific-historical consideration, where the comparison of Bessermian dialect with Chuvash language, scientifically recognized as the only living language of Bulgar (or Oghur) group of the Turkish languages, was made. On the basis of the historiographical analysis the conclusion is made: despite the fact that at present Besermians are referred to small Finno-Ugrian groups, the question of their identification with the autochthonous Finno-Ugrian.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从伏尔加-乌拉尔地区各民族的历史交流过程看塞尔维亚人的语言
本文考虑了“贝塞尔米安问题”的语言学方面,其本质在于贝塞尔米安民族起源问题的可争议性,即关于贝塞尔米安民族的突厥或芬兰-乌戈尔起源的问题,其历史在过去几个世纪中在乌拉尔地区的领土上展开,没有书面资料,也很少研究。对这个问题的兴趣源于对构成伏尔加保加利亚人口的民族的历史迁移的研究,这是一个强大的国家形成,在蒙古-鞑靼征服期间不复存在,并澄清了人们的历史命运,记录在一些中世纪的资料中,命名为“Beserm'en”。为了验证这一假设,允许将贝塞尔米安人视为“卡玛保加利亚人的直系后裔”,贝塞尔米安语研究人员在19世纪末以及20世纪至21世纪初收集的材料进行了更新,并受到科学历史的考虑,其中贝塞尔米安方言与Chuvash语言的比较,科学上被认为是保加利亚语(或奥胡尔语)土耳其语系中唯一活着的语言。在史学分析的基础上得出结论:尽管目前塞尔维亚人被称为小的芬兰-乌克兰群体,但他们与土著芬兰-乌克兰人的认同问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the Role of the Library in the Context of Preservating National Languages Vladimir Monomakh’s Role in the Development of Literature and System of State at Rus The Role of Teachers in Promoting Autonomous Language Learning: The Case of Addis Ababa Science and Technology University Lexical and Stylistic Analysis of Advertising Texts through the Erich Fromm's Philosophy (“To Have or to Be?”) (on the Example of Posts Published in the Official Telegram Channel of Federal Agency for Youth Affairs (“Rosmolodezh”)) Speech Formulas Serving the Everyday Discourse of the Shangodinsky Dialect of the Avar Language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1