La secularización como un discurso de “misión”: una mirada desde el feminismo crítico y los feminismos descoloniales

Andrea Meza Torres
{"title":"La secularización como un discurso de “misión”: una mirada desde el feminismo crítico y los feminismos descoloniales","authors":"Andrea Meza Torres","doi":"10.22201/CEIICH.24485705E.2021.24.78462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"| This article starts by exposing a sharp critique of the secularization discourse through the main arguments of Joan Wallach Scott’s book Sex and Secularism. Here, the feminist author criticizes this process as a power discourse which does not correspond to historical facts; moreover, Scott argues that the equality of the sexes was never at the heart of the process of secularization. The author shows that this discourse is based on a dichotomical thinking which, nowadays, has generated the dichotomy “(western) gender equality and sexual freedom” versus “islam”. This dichotomy, based on the image superiority/inferiority, supports geopolitical aims which are associated with the colonization of the peripheries. Therefore, it can be associated to the discourse of the colonial “mission” and its continuity. In the second part of this article, I present three decolonial thinkers: Arzu Merali, Houria Bouteldja and Sirin Adlbi Sibai who, from Muslim and/or Arab societies within the Global North, express a critique toward western (white) feminism and the secularization process associated with it. The aim of this article is to show points of convergence between a feminist, critical voice which emerged within the western academic field —and which gave an important turn— and women’s voices who have been systematically silenced in western academia. Moreover, beyond the critique of secularization from within the western academia, this article aims to show alternative proposals from the global peripheries which do not see the discourse of secularization as a way out of oppression. The points of convergence between critical feminism and the voices of Muslim women thinkers show that the historicity and ideological force of the secularization process must be thoroughly questioned and analyzed to propose new dialogue alternatives beyond the missions of imperial Christendom and / or its secularized theological version.","PeriodicalId":299795,"journal":{"name":"Informatica Didactica","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatica Didactica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/CEIICH.24485705E.2021.24.78462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

| This article starts by exposing a sharp critique of the secularization discourse through the main arguments of Joan Wallach Scott’s book Sex and Secularism. Here, the feminist author criticizes this process as a power discourse which does not correspond to historical facts; moreover, Scott argues that the equality of the sexes was never at the heart of the process of secularization. The author shows that this discourse is based on a dichotomical thinking which, nowadays, has generated the dichotomy “(western) gender equality and sexual freedom” versus “islam”. This dichotomy, based on the image superiority/inferiority, supports geopolitical aims which are associated with the colonization of the peripheries. Therefore, it can be associated to the discourse of the colonial “mission” and its continuity. In the second part of this article, I present three decolonial thinkers: Arzu Merali, Houria Bouteldja and Sirin Adlbi Sibai who, from Muslim and/or Arab societies within the Global North, express a critique toward western (white) feminism and the secularization process associated with it. The aim of this article is to show points of convergence between a feminist, critical voice which emerged within the western academic field —and which gave an important turn— and women’s voices who have been systematically silenced in western academia. Moreover, beyond the critique of secularization from within the western academia, this article aims to show alternative proposals from the global peripheries which do not see the discourse of secularization as a way out of oppression. The points of convergence between critical feminism and the voices of Muslim women thinkers show that the historicity and ideological force of the secularization process must be thoroughly questioned and analyzed to propose new dialogue alternatives beyond the missions of imperial Christendom and / or its secularized theological version.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为“使命”话语的世俗化:批判女权主义和非殖民女权主义的视角
本文首先通过琼·沃拉赫·斯科特的《性与世俗主义》一书中的主要论点,对世俗化话语进行尖锐的批判。在这里,女权主义作者批评这一过程是一种不符合历史事实的权力话语;此外,斯科特认为两性平等从来不是世俗化进程的核心。作者指出,这种话语建立在一种二元思维的基础上,这种二元思维在今天产生了“(西方)性别平等和性自由”与“伊斯兰”的二元对立。这种基于形象优势/劣势的二分法,支持与边缘地区殖民化相关的地缘政治目标。因此,它可以与殖民“使命”的话语及其连续性联系起来。在本文的第二部分,我介绍了三位非殖民主义思想家:Arzu Merali, Houria Bouteldja和Sirin Adlbi Sibai,他们来自全球北方的穆斯林和/或阿拉伯社会,对西方(白人)女权主义及其相关的世俗化进程提出了批评。这篇文章的目的是展示西方学术界出现的女权主义、批判的声音——这是一个重要的转折——与西方学术界被系统地压制的女性声音之间的交汇点。此外,除了西方学术界对世俗化的批评之外,本文旨在展示来自全球边缘地区的替代建议,这些建议并不认为世俗化的话语是摆脱压迫的一种方式。批判女性主义与穆斯林女性思想家的声音之间的交汇点表明,必须彻底质疑和分析世俗化进程的历史性和意识形态力量,以提出超越帝国基督教和/或其世俗化神学版本的新对话选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estudios del futuro para comprender la posibilidad de la Universidad Ubicua Formación, arraigo y movilidad rural–urbana en la juventud mexicana y española Los efectos de la mundialización sobre las migraciones laborales de la población rural mexicana Líneas de conflicto en la apropiación de los recursos agrobiológicos: las contrastantes expediciones de Vavilov y Brücher Las misiones de la ciencia: territorios, experticia y gubernamentalidad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1