Revisiting old friends: is CoDel really achieving what RED cannot?

N. Kuhn, E. Lochin, O. Mehani
{"title":"Revisiting old friends: is CoDel really achieving what RED cannot?","authors":"N. Kuhn, E. Lochin, O. Mehani","doi":"10.1145/2630088.2630094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use ns-2 simulations to compare RED's gentle_ mode to CoDel in terms of their ability to reduce the latency for various TCP variants. We use a common dumbbell topol- ogy with Pareto background traffic, and measure the packet delays and transmission time of a 10 MB FTP transfer. In our scenarios, we find that CoDel reduces the latency by 87%, but RED still manages to reduce it by 75%. However, the use of CoDel results in a transmission time 42% longer than when using RED. In light of its maturity, we therefore argue that RED could be considered as a good candidate to tackle Bufferbloat.","PeriodicalId":106412,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2630088.2630094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

We use ns-2 simulations to compare RED's gentle_ mode to CoDel in terms of their ability to reduce the latency for various TCP variants. We use a common dumbbell topol- ogy with Pareto background traffic, and measure the packet delays and transmission time of a 10 MB FTP transfer. In our scenarios, we find that CoDel reduces the latency by 87%, but RED still manages to reduce it by 75%. However, the use of CoDel results in a transmission time 42% longer than when using RED. In light of its maturity, we therefore argue that RED could be considered as a good candidate to tackle Bufferbloat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温老朋友:CoDel真的实现了RED无法实现的目标吗?
我们使用ns-2模拟来比较RED的绅士模式与CoDel在减少各种TCP变体延迟方面的能力。我们使用一个常见的哑铃拓扑与帕累托背景流量,并测量数据包延迟和传输时间的10mb FTP传输。在我们的场景中,我们发现CoDel将延迟减少了87%,但RED仍然设法将延迟减少了75%。然而,使用CoDel导致的传输时间比使用RED时长42%。鉴于其成熟度,我们认为RED可以被视为解决Bufferbloat的一个很好的候选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Capacity sharing workshop Experimental evaluation of multipath TCP schedulers Mobile network sharing between operators: a demand trace-driven study Session details: Technical session 1: queuing and scheduling Network assisted rate adaptation for conversational video over LTE, concept and performance evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1