Development of Wage Inequality for Natives and Immigrants in Germany - Evidence from Quantile Regression and Decomposition

H. Peters
{"title":"Development of Wage Inequality for Natives and Immigrants in Germany - Evidence from Quantile Regression and Decomposition","authors":"H. Peters","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1151194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To study the development of wage inequality is important for the economic performance as well as for the development of employment. First, I estimate the remuneration to personal characteristics for Germans and immigrants across the wage distribution using quantile regression. My database is the German socio-economic panel for the period 1984-2006. I find a higher inequality between skill groups for Germans relative to immigrants. The returns to skill for the highest educational attainment are higher for Germans across the wage distribution compared to immigrants. But within-group inequality for the group with the highest educational attainment is higher for immigrants. Both groups have concave experience-earnings profiles. One more year of work experience increases the wage more for Germans. Secondly I use the decomposition method of Melly (2006). Decomposition methods are suitable to get further insights into the question as to whether or not the observable differences in the distribution are caused by the difference in the composition or differences in the estimated coefficients. Immigrants have a negative wage gap relative to Germans. The wage gap rises across the distribution and is due to a rising discrimination of immigrants across the wage distribution for the years 1992 and 2006. For the year 1984 the characteristic effect is responsible for the wage gap. Inequality rises for both groups between the year 1992 and 2006. The increase is much stronger for Immigrants. The coefficient effect is mainly responsible for the wage increase across time for both groups.","PeriodicalId":142467,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1151194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

To study the development of wage inequality is important for the economic performance as well as for the development of employment. First, I estimate the remuneration to personal characteristics for Germans and immigrants across the wage distribution using quantile regression. My database is the German socio-economic panel for the period 1984-2006. I find a higher inequality between skill groups for Germans relative to immigrants. The returns to skill for the highest educational attainment are higher for Germans across the wage distribution compared to immigrants. But within-group inequality for the group with the highest educational attainment is higher for immigrants. Both groups have concave experience-earnings profiles. One more year of work experience increases the wage more for Germans. Secondly I use the decomposition method of Melly (2006). Decomposition methods are suitable to get further insights into the question as to whether or not the observable differences in the distribution are caused by the difference in the composition or differences in the estimated coefficients. Immigrants have a negative wage gap relative to Germans. The wage gap rises across the distribution and is due to a rising discrimination of immigrants across the wage distribution for the years 1992 and 2006. For the year 1984 the characteristic effect is responsible for the wage gap. Inequality rises for both groups between the year 1992 and 2006. The increase is much stronger for Immigrants. The coefficient effect is mainly responsible for the wage increase across time for both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国本地人和移民工资不平等的发展——来自分位数回归和分解的证据
研究工资不平等的发展对经济运行和就业发展都具有重要意义。首先,我使用分位数回归估计了德国人和移民在工资分配中的个人特征报酬。我的数据库是1984-2006年间的德国社会经济面板。我发现,相对于移民,德国人的技能群体之间存在更大的不平等。与移民相比,德国人在整个工资分配中,受教育程度最高的技能回报更高。但在移民群体中,受教育程度最高的群体内部的不平等程度更高。这两个群体的经验-收入曲线都是凹形的。对于德国人来说,多一年的工作经验会增加更多的工资。其次,我使用melanie(2006)的分解方法。分解方法适用于进一步了解分布中可观察到的差异是由组成差异引起的,还是由估计系数的差异引起的。与德国人相比,移民的工资差距为负。工资差距在整个分配中不断扩大,这是由于1992年和2006年在工资分配中对移民的歧视不断加剧。就1984年而言,特征效应是造成工资差距的原因。从1992年到2006年,这两个群体的不平等程度都在上升。移民的增长更为强劲。系数效应是导致两组人的工资随时间增长的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Doughboys Network: Social Interactions and the Employment of World War I Veterans Low-Skill Employment and the Changing Economy of Rural America Grade Inflation, Social Background, and Labour Market Matching Schools Before Tools? The Role of Human Capital in a Market Economy Education, Innovation, and Long-Run Growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1