Colombian Physiotherapists' Use of Functional Outcome Measures in Their Practice.

Cristian Renteria, K. Berg
{"title":"Colombian Physiotherapists' Use of Functional Outcome Measures in Their Practice.","authors":"Cristian Renteria, K. Berg","doi":"10.3138/PTC.2018-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We examined physiotherapists' use of functional outcome measures in their practice to compare the frequency of use of functional outcome measures and impairment-based measures and to explore policies and practices related to the use of functional outcome measures in Colombia. Method: Eligible participants were licensed physiotherapists actively practising in Colombia. They were recruited by means of a survey link sent via email by a continuing education organization to all the physiotherapists in its database and through snowball sampling. The survey was adapted from questionnaires previously used in similar research in other countries. We used descriptive statistics to describe the use of 14 functional outcome measures and 4 impairment-based measures that have been translated into Spanish and to compare the demographics of the participants who used and did not use the listed functional outcome measures. Results: Of the 606 respondents, 87% used 1-14 of the listed functional outcome measures regularly or sometimes in their practice. The most commonly used functional outcome measures were the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (59%), the Barthel Index (56%), and the Berg Balance Scale (53%). In addition, 60% of respondents reported their workplace does charting electronically, 66% stated that their practice mandates or regularly uses functional outcome measures, and 59% indicated that they can independently select which outcome measures to use. Conclusions: The majority of Colombian physiotherapists surveyed are using outcome measures in their practice, which indicates that they are engaged in evidence-based practice. Study findings may stimulate more sharing of information on patient outcomes among Colombian physiotherapists, promote further research, and contribute to advancing practice in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":390485,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/PTC.2018-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: We examined physiotherapists' use of functional outcome measures in their practice to compare the frequency of use of functional outcome measures and impairment-based measures and to explore policies and practices related to the use of functional outcome measures in Colombia. Method: Eligible participants were licensed physiotherapists actively practising in Colombia. They were recruited by means of a survey link sent via email by a continuing education organization to all the physiotherapists in its database and through snowball sampling. The survey was adapted from questionnaires previously used in similar research in other countries. We used descriptive statistics to describe the use of 14 functional outcome measures and 4 impairment-based measures that have been translated into Spanish and to compare the demographics of the participants who used and did not use the listed functional outcome measures. Results: Of the 606 respondents, 87% used 1-14 of the listed functional outcome measures regularly or sometimes in their practice. The most commonly used functional outcome measures were the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (59%), the Barthel Index (56%), and the Berg Balance Scale (53%). In addition, 60% of respondents reported their workplace does charting electronically, 66% stated that their practice mandates or regularly uses functional outcome measures, and 59% indicated that they can independently select which outcome measures to use. Conclusions: The majority of Colombian physiotherapists surveyed are using outcome measures in their practice, which indicates that they are engaged in evidence-based practice. Study findings may stimulate more sharing of information on patient outcomes among Colombian physiotherapists, promote further research, and contribute to advancing practice in Colombia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚物理治疗师在实践中使用功能结果测量。
目的:我们研究了物理治疗师在实践中使用功能结果测量的情况,以比较功能结果测量和基于损伤的测量的使用频率,并探索与哥伦比亚使用功能结果测量相关的政策和实践。方法:符合条件的参与者是在哥伦比亚积极执业的持牌物理治疗师。他们是通过继续教育组织通过电子邮件发送给其数据库中的所有物理治疗师的调查链接和滚雪球抽样的方式招募的。这项调查是根据其他国家之前类似研究中使用的问卷进行改编的。我们使用描述性统计来描述已翻译成西班牙语的14种功能结果测量方法和4种基于损伤的测量方法的使用情况,并比较使用和未使用列出的功能结果测量方法的参与者的人口统计学特征。结果:在606名受访者中,87%的人定期或有时在实践中使用列出的1-14项功能结果测量。最常用的功能结果测量是Borg感知运动评分(59%)、Barthel指数(56%)和Berg平衡量表(53%)。此外,60%的受访者表示他们的工作场所使用电子图表,66%的受访者表示他们的实践要求或定期使用功能性结果测量,59%的受访者表示他们可以独立选择使用哪种结果测量。结论:大多数接受调查的哥伦比亚物理治疗师在他们的实践中使用结果测量,这表明他们从事循证实践。研究结果可能会刺激哥伦比亚物理治疗师之间更多地分享有关患者结果的信息,促进进一步的研究,并为哥伦比亚的实践做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Ambulatory Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis. Evidence-Based Practice: Physiotherapy for Children and Adolescents with Motor Symptoms of Conversion Disorder. What Does Cochrane Say about … Respiratory Physiotherapy for Children? Students' Perspectives on Their Experience in Clinical Placements: Using a Modified Delphi Methodology to Engage Physiotherapy Stakeholders in Revising the National Form. Interrater Reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale with Standardized Movement Speeds: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1