How Accurate Is Dynamic Program Slicing? An Empirical Approach to Compute Accuracy Bounds

Siyuan Jiang, Raúl A. Santelices, Haipeng Cai, M. Grechanik
{"title":"How Accurate Is Dynamic Program Slicing? An Empirical Approach to Compute Accuracy Bounds","authors":"Siyuan Jiang, Raúl A. Santelices, Haipeng Cai, M. Grechanik","doi":"10.1109/SERE-C.2014.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic program slicing attempts to find runtime dependencies among statements to support security, reliability, and quality tasks such as information-flow analysis, testing, and debugging. However, it is not known how accurately dynamic slices identify statements that really affect each other. We propose a new approach to estimate the accuracy of dynamic slices. We use this approach to obtain bounds on the accuracy of multiple dynamic slices in Java software. Early results suggest that dynamic slices suffer from some imprecision and, more critically, can have a low recall whose upper bound we estimate to be 60% on average.","PeriodicalId":373062,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SERE-C.2014.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dynamic program slicing attempts to find runtime dependencies among statements to support security, reliability, and quality tasks such as information-flow analysis, testing, and debugging. However, it is not known how accurately dynamic slices identify statements that really affect each other. We propose a new approach to estimate the accuracy of dynamic slices. We use this approach to obtain bounds on the accuracy of multiple dynamic slices in Java software. Early results suggest that dynamic slices suffer from some imprecision and, more critically, can have a low recall whose upper bound we estimate to be 60% on average.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态程序切片有多准确?计算精度界限的经验方法
动态程序切片试图找到语句之间的运行时依赖关系,以支持安全性、可靠性和质量任务,例如信息流分析、测试和调试。然而,动态切片如何准确地识别真正相互影响的语句并不为人所知。提出了一种估算动态切片精度的新方法。我们使用这种方法在Java软件中获得了多个动态切片的精度界限。早期的结果表明,动态切片存在一些不精确,更关键的是,它的召回率很低,我们估计其上限平均为60%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis-Guided Regression Test Refinement CRAXDroid: Automatic Android System Testing by Selective Symbolic Execution Security Analysis of MAC Protocol for Mobile Device Identification Based on PARADIS Protection against Code Obfuscation Attacks Based on Control Dependencies in Android Systems MicroApp: Architecting Web Application for Non-uniform Trustworthiness in Cloud Computing Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1