晚明遼東「橫江」考

馬驥 馬驥
{"title":"晚明遼東「橫江」考","authors":"馬驥 馬驥","doi":"10.53106/160759942023060040003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 日本學者稻葉岩吉最早指出鴨綠江的支流渾江在明代有「橫江」之名,但這一觀點從未得到證實。通過爬梳熊廷弼〈勘覆地界疏〉、《狀啓謄錄》等文獻的記載可知,該觀點是成立的。橫江還從河流名稱引申為區域名稱。直到成化朝(1465-1487)為止,明朝官方只是對朝鮮王朝(1392-1919)用以稱呼渾江的「婆豬江」地名稍有了解,此後長期對渾江缺乏認知。萬曆三十六、三十七年(1608、1609)間,熊廷弼在遼東的勘界調查,使「橫江」一名得以廣泛傳佈。明末遼東戰事爆發後,明朝不少官僚士人都重視橫江的軍事地理價值。但隨著明亡清興,以及這一歷史進程中的邊疆人群瓦解,流域封禁,橫江失去了穩固為官方地名的機會,不再見諸文獻記載。\n The Japanese scholar Inaba Iwakichi was the first to point out that, during the Ming dynasty, the Hun River, a tributary of the Yalu River, had been called Hengjiang, but this view had not been independently confirmed. After combing through and analyzing Xiong Tingbi’s “Kanfu Dijie Shu,” “Zhuangqi Tenglu,” and other documents, it can be verified that this view is indeed correct. Hengjiang was further extended from a river name to a regional name. Up until the Chenghua reign (1465-1487), the Ming officials were only vaguely familiar with the name Pajeogang used by the Choson dynasty (1392-1919) to address the Hun River, but from that time onward, they had little awareness of the Hun River. However, Xiong Tingbi’s survey of the national boundary in Liaodong carried out during the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh years of the Wanli reign (1608, 1609) made it widespread. After the Liaodong War broke out in the late Ming, many officials and scholars attached importance to the military geographic value of the name Hengjiang and its river and territory. However, with the fall of the Ming and the rise of the Qing dynasty, as well as the collapse of the frontier people and the closure of the watershed basin in this historical process, the name Hengjiang lost the opportunity to become an official place name and its use was discontinued.\n \n","PeriodicalId":160957,"journal":{"name":"明代研究","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"明代研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/160759942023060040003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

日本學者稻葉岩吉最早指出鴨綠江的支流渾江在明代有「橫江」之名,但這一觀點從未得到證實。通過爬梳熊廷弼〈勘覆地界疏〉、《狀啓謄錄》等文獻的記載可知,該觀點是成立的。橫江還從河流名稱引申為區域名稱。直到成化朝(1465-1487)為止,明朝官方只是對朝鮮王朝(1392-1919)用以稱呼渾江的「婆豬江」地名稍有了解,此後長期對渾江缺乏認知。萬曆三十六、三十七年(1608、1609)間,熊廷弼在遼東的勘界調查,使「橫江」一名得以廣泛傳佈。明末遼東戰事爆發後,明朝不少官僚士人都重視橫江的軍事地理價值。但隨著明亡清興,以及這一歷史進程中的邊疆人群瓦解,流域封禁,橫江失去了穩固為官方地名的機會,不再見諸文獻記載。  The Japanese scholar Inaba Iwakichi was the first to point out that, during the Ming dynasty, the Hun River, a tributary of the Yalu River, had been called Hengjiang, but this view had not been independently confirmed. After combing through and analyzing Xiong Tingbi’s “Kanfu Dijie Shu,” “Zhuangqi Tenglu,” and other documents, it can be verified that this view is indeed correct. Hengjiang was further extended from a river name to a regional name. Up until the Chenghua reign (1465-1487), the Ming officials were only vaguely familiar with the name Pajeogang used by the Choson dynasty (1392-1919) to address the Hun River, but from that time onward, they had little awareness of the Hun River. However, Xiong Tingbi’s survey of the national boundary in Liaodong carried out during the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh years of the Wanli reign (1608, 1609) made it widespread. After the Liaodong War broke out in the late Ming, many officials and scholars attached importance to the military geographic value of the name Hengjiang and its river and territory. However, with the fall of the Ming and the rise of the Qing dynasty, as well as the collapse of the frontier people and the closure of the watershed basin in this historical process, the name Hengjiang lost the opportunity to become an official place name and its use was discontinued.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚明辽东「横江」考
日本学者稻叶岩吉最早指出鸭绿江的支流浑江在明代有「横江」之名,但这一观点从未得到证实。通过爬梳熊廷弼〈勘覆地界疏〉、《状启誊录》等文献的记载可知,该观点是成立的。横江还从河流名称引申为区域名称。直到成化朝(1465-1487)为止,明朝官方只是对朝鲜王朝(1392-1919)用以称呼浑江的「婆猪江」地名稍有了解,此后长期对浑江缺乏认知。万历三十六、三十七年(1608、1609)间,熊廷弼在辽东的勘界调查,使「横江」一名得以广泛传布。明末辽东战事爆发后,明朝不少官僚士人都重视横江的军事地理价值。但随著明亡清兴,以及这一历史进程中的边疆人群瓦解,流域封禁,横江失去了稳固为官方地名的机会,不再见诸文献记载。 The Japanese scholar Inaba Iwakichi was the first to point out that, during the Ming dynasty, the Hun River, a tributary of the Yalu River, had been called Hengjiang, but this view had not been independently confirmed. After combing through and analyzing Xiong Tingbi’s “Kanfu Dijie Shu,” “Zhuangqi Tenglu,” and other documents, it can be verified that this view is indeed correct. Hengjiang was further extended from a river name to a regional name. Up until the Chenghua reign (1465-1487), the Ming officials were only vaguely familiar with the name Pajeogang used by the Choson dynasty (1392-1919) to address the Hun River, but from that time onward, they had little awareness of the Hun River. However, Xiong Tingbi’s survey of the national boundary in Liaodong carried out during the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh years of the Wanli reign (1608, 1609) made it widespread. After the Liaodong War broke out in the late Ming, many officials and scholars attached importance to the military geographic value of the name Hengjiang and its river and territory. However, with the fall of the Ming and the rise of the Qing dynasty, as well as the collapse of the frontier people and the closure of the watershed basin in this historical process, the name Hengjiang lost the opportunity to become an official place name and its use was discontinued.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
晚明私修嘉隆史書著者的個人際遇與歷史書寫──以支大綸《世穆兩朝編年史》為例 晚明重情文化下入教士大夫的納妾與懺悔:以王徵《崇一堂日記隨筆》為例 「明代臨清與大運河」國際學術研討會暨第22屆明史國際學術研討會會議紀實 評焦堃《陽明心學與明代內閣政治》 「明代研究新趨勢」學術座談會報導
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1