Self-Fulfilling Fire Sales: Fragility of Collateralised Short-Term Debt Markets

J. Kuong
{"title":"Self-Fulfilling Fire Sales: Fragility of Collateralised Short-Term Debt Markets","authors":"J. Kuong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2506661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that collateralised short-term debt, although privately optimal for reducing borrowers’ moral hazard, can cause fragility (multiple equilibria) when the collateral market is illiquid. A new form of coordination failure between borrowers’ ex ante margin and risk-taking decisions engenders a systemic run in the collateralised debt market: large changes in credit rationing, margins, repo spreads, etc. The model also captures the large (small) crosssectional differences between safe and risky collateral in bad (good) times. Finally, I show that asset price guarantees could improve welfare and promote stability but repealing repo contracts’ “automatic stay” exemption might do the opposite.","PeriodicalId":122208,"journal":{"name":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INSEAD Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2506661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

This paper shows that collateralised short-term debt, although privately optimal for reducing borrowers’ moral hazard, can cause fragility (multiple equilibria) when the collateral market is illiquid. A new form of coordination failure between borrowers’ ex ante margin and risk-taking decisions engenders a systemic run in the collateralised debt market: large changes in credit rationing, margins, repo spreads, etc. The model also captures the large (small) crosssectional differences between safe and risky collateral in bad (good) times. Finally, I show that asset price guarantees could improve welfare and promote stability but repealing repo contracts’ “automatic stay” exemption might do the opposite.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我实现的甩卖:短期债务抵押市场的脆弱性
本文表明,尽管短期债务抵押对降低借款人的道德风险是最优的,但当抵押市场缺乏流动性时,它可能导致脆弱性(多重均衡)。借款人事前保证金与冒险决策之间的一种新形式的协调失灵,导致了债务抵押市场的系统性挤兑:信贷配给、保证金、回购价差等方面发生了巨大变化。该模型还捕捉到了安全抵押品和风险抵押品在经济低迷时期(经济繁荣时期)的大(小)横截面差异。最后,我表明,资产价格担保可以改善福利并促进稳定,但废除回购合约的“自动停留”豁免可能会适得其反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermodynamics and Gradient Manipulation Mechanism in Entrepreneurial Actions Leading a Board of Directors in The United Kingdom: Indirect Leadership Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance after Opioid Initiation A Study on Construction of an Investment Portfolio Using Fundamental Analysis Explaining the Erosion of Relational Care Continuity: An Empirical Analysis of Primary Care in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1