The Rising Tide of Financial Crime: A Ponzi Scheme Case Analysis

Rizaldy Anggriawan, M. Susila, Ming-Hsi Sung, Dwilani Irrynta
{"title":"The Rising Tide of Financial Crime: A Ponzi Scheme Case Analysis","authors":"Rizaldy Anggriawan, M. Susila, Ming-Hsi Sung, Dwilani Irrynta","doi":"10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.60004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ponzi scheme is one of the most common types of fraud perpetrated by con artists. The reason for this is that the mode is relatively easy to conceal. In this regard, criminal law plays a significant role in countering fraudulent practices. It serves as an initial warning to individuals who intend to engage in such behavior that they may face harsh penalties if they do so. The study aims to compare and analyze the Ponzi and pyramid schemes in the framework of criminal law enforcement. It also thoroughly investigates the criminal rules and their application to specific cases associated with Ponzi and pyramid schemes in Indonesia. This normative or doctrinal legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The study reveals that there is some confusion in the community as well as the legal enforcement officers on the practice of Ponzi and pyramid schemes. As a result of this discrepancy, law enforcement officers may be incorrect in ensnaring an allegation against the offenders, or they may even consider that offenders are innocent. It is also exacerbated by the lack of a single rule that particularly governs the issue of Ponzi schemes, which may result in a legal vacuum. This circumstance might therefore be used by irresponsible persons to create such business companies that use Ponzi schemes and conceal their actions with crypto investment or robot trading software, as recently occurred in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":292299,"journal":{"name":"Lex Scientia Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Scientia Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.60004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ponzi scheme is one of the most common types of fraud perpetrated by con artists. The reason for this is that the mode is relatively easy to conceal. In this regard, criminal law plays a significant role in countering fraudulent practices. It serves as an initial warning to individuals who intend to engage in such behavior that they may face harsh penalties if they do so. The study aims to compare and analyze the Ponzi and pyramid schemes in the framework of criminal law enforcement. It also thoroughly investigates the criminal rules and their application to specific cases associated with Ponzi and pyramid schemes in Indonesia. This normative or doctrinal legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The study reveals that there is some confusion in the community as well as the legal enforcement officers on the practice of Ponzi and pyramid schemes. As a result of this discrepancy, law enforcement officers may be incorrect in ensnaring an allegation against the offenders, or they may even consider that offenders are innocent. It is also exacerbated by the lack of a single rule that particularly governs the issue of Ponzi schemes, which may result in a legal vacuum. This circumstance might therefore be used by irresponsible persons to create such business companies that use Ponzi schemes and conceal their actions with crypto investment or robot trading software, as recently occurred in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融犯罪的上升趋势:庞氏骗局案例分析
庞氏骗局是骗子犯下的最常见的欺诈类型之一。这样做的原因是模式相对容易隐藏。在这方面,刑法在打击欺诈行为方面发挥着重要作用。它是对那些打算从事这种行为的人的初步警告,如果他们这样做,他们可能会面临严厉的惩罚。本研究旨在从刑事执法的角度对庞氏骗局和传销骗局进行比较分析。它还彻底调查了刑事规则及其在印度尼西亚与庞氏骗局和金字塔骗局有关的具体案件中的应用。这种规范或理论的法律研究采用成文法、概念和案例方法。研究显示,社会和执法人员对庞氏骗局和金字塔骗局的做法存在一些困惑。由于这种差异,执法人员在对违法者提出指控时可能是错误的,或者他们甚至可能认为违法者是无辜的。由于缺乏专门管理庞氏骗局问题的单一规则,可能导致法律真空,这也加剧了这种情况。因此,不负责任的人可能会利用这种情况来创建这样的商业公司,这些公司使用庞氏骗局,并用加密投资或机器人交易软件隐瞒他们的行为,就像最近在印度尼西亚发生的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positivization of Fatwas of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council in the Sharia Banking Law: Problems and Challenges Land Subsidence Policy in the Context of Good Governance Principles (Comparing Indonesia and Japan) Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Vietnam’s New Generation Free Trade Agreements – Challenges and Recommendations Rejection of Former Shia Community in Sampang Perspective on Human Rights Law: Discourse of Religious Rights and Freedom in Indonesia Comparative Analysis Between Employees Provident Fund (EPF) & Private Retirement Scheme (PRS) in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1