Another Appeal for Pragmatic Reform: The Future of Section 427 Bank Act Security and Canadian Personal Property Security Law

Clayton Bangsund
{"title":"Another Appeal for Pragmatic Reform: The Future of Section 427 Bank Act Security and Canadian Personal Property Security Law","authors":"Clayton Bangsund","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1995572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I propose specific amendments to the Bank Act security provisions that will ultimately result in the repeal of Bank Act security. While the concept of repealing Bank Act security is certainly not novel, my recommended approach is unique in that it diverges from the Law Commission of Canada’s recommendations in the following article: “Modernizing Canada’s Secured Transactions Law: The Bank Act Security Provisions” (Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada, 2004).","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I propose specific amendments to the Bank Act security provisions that will ultimately result in the repeal of Bank Act security. While the concept of repealing Bank Act security is certainly not novel, my recommended approach is unique in that it diverges from the Law Commission of Canada’s recommendations in the following article: “Modernizing Canada’s Secured Transactions Law: The Bank Act Security Provisions” (Ottawa: Law Commission of Canada, 2004).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实用主义改革的另一诉求:《银行法》第427条安全与加拿大个人财产安全法的未来》
在本文中,我对《银行法》担保条款提出了具体的修正案,最终将导致《银行法》担保的废除。虽然废除银行法担保的概念并不新颖,但我推荐的方法是独特的,因为它与加拿大法律委员会在以下文章中的建议不同:“加拿大担保交易法的现代化:银行法担保条款”(渥太华:加拿大法律委员会,2004年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to Canadian Government's Consultation on a Modern Copyright Framework for Online Intermediaries Legal Documents as Means of Financial Abstraction: How the Bankers’ Lawyers Constructed Swaps and Changed Finance Corporate Adolescence: Why Did 'We' not Work? AI Governance in Canadian Banking: Fairness, Credit Models, and Equality Rights Policy Forum: The Case for an Annual Net Wealth Tax
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1