Manifeste pour l'ergonomie prospective: anticiper de futures activités humaines en vue de concevoir de nouveaux artéfacts

E. Brangier, J. Robert
{"title":"Manifeste pour l'ergonomie prospective: anticiper de futures activités humaines en vue de concevoir de nouveaux artéfacts","authors":"E. Brangier, J. Robert","doi":"10.1145/1941007.1941016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is at first a text of critical reflections, epistemological controversies and speculative positioning on the evolution of ergonomics. It aims at discussing about the future of the discipline, by considering a temporal evolution that sees the development of ergonomics through the past, present, and future of human activity. When ergonomics is applied for correcting (or improving) existing situations, it is corrective. When it is called for acting on current situations, it is ergonomics for design. And when it is considered for dealing with future needs, it becomes prospective. Thus, this article reconsiders the distinction between corrective ergonomics and ergonomics for design in order to propose a third avenue to the discipline: Prospective ergonomics. This can be defined as the part of ergonomics whose goal is to study, in collaboration with other disciplines, the technical, social, cultural and economic factors that shape the evolution of human activities, so as to define, design, and realise human-centered innovations, that are useful and beneficial to humans in terms of comfort, performance, pleasure and/or personal development.","PeriodicalId":416251,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","volume":"37 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1941007.1941016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This article is at first a text of critical reflections, epistemological controversies and speculative positioning on the evolution of ergonomics. It aims at discussing about the future of the discipline, by considering a temporal evolution that sees the development of ergonomics through the past, present, and future of human activity. When ergonomics is applied for correcting (or improving) existing situations, it is corrective. When it is called for acting on current situations, it is ergonomics for design. And when it is considered for dealing with future needs, it becomes prospective. Thus, this article reconsiders the distinction between corrective ergonomics and ergonomics for design in order to propose a third avenue to the discipline: Prospective ergonomics. This can be defined as the part of ergonomics whose goal is to study, in collaboration with other disciplines, the technical, social, cultural and economic factors that shape the evolution of human activities, so as to define, design, and realise human-centered innovations, that are useful and beneficial to humans in terms of comfort, performance, pleasure and/or personal development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前瞻性工效学宣言:预测未来的人类活动,以设计新的人工制品
本文首先是一篇关于人类工程学发展的批判性反思、认识论争议和思辨定位的文本。它旨在通过考虑人类活动的过去、现在和未来的人类工程学发展的时间演变来讨论该学科的未来。当人体工程学被用于纠正(或改善)现有情况时,它是纠正的。当它被要求对当前情况采取行动时,它是设计的人体工程学。当它被考虑用于处理未来需求时,它就变成了前瞻性的。因此,本文重新考虑了纠正人体工程学和设计人体工程学之间的区别,以提出第三条途径的学科:前瞻性人体工程学。这可以被定义为人体工程学的一部分,其目标是与其他学科合作,研究影响人类活动演变的技术、社会、文化和经济因素,从而定义、设计和实现以人为本的创新,这些创新在舒适、性能、快乐和/或个人发展方面对人类有用和有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Une approche à base de modèles pour l'ingénierie logicielle de techniques d'interaction Ecran virtuel multifonction: outil pour le concepteur mécanicien Efficacité et robustesse aux distracteurs d'un retour tactile pour faciliter le pointage IHM et démocratie quand une machine à voter n'est pas utilisable par les seniors Méthode de détermination des fonctions de gains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1