Political stance of Libyan tribes during the Civil War (2019–2020)

Mariya I. Makhmutova
{"title":"Political stance of Libyan tribes during the Civil War (2019–2020)","authors":"Mariya I. Makhmutova","doi":"10.23859/2587-8344-2022-6-2-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author analyzes one of the most difficult problems in the Arab region, the civil war in Libya after the overthrow of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The author focuses on the fresh round of the escalation of the conflict (2019–20) between the eastern and western centers of power. The paper presents the importance of the political positions of Libyan tribes in the course of hostilities and their impact on the internal situation. The key issue of the study considered in the article directly concerns the political positions of the main clans within Libya. The author explains why some of the clans decided to participate in the military campaign on the side of the Libyan National Army, while the other defended the Government of National Accord; there were also those who adopted the position of non-interference in national affairs, since they sought to maintain autonomy. The main purpose of this work is to demonstrate the specifics of the Libyan problem, which is not only the desire of Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and Fezzan for their autonomous existence but also the internal contradictions between different tribes. It remains one of the most important factors hindering the unification of the country. After analyzing the publications in the modern Arabic-language press, the author offered her vision of the reasons for the ongoing armed confrontation in Libya and also presented and analyzed the full range of political positions and the role of the main Libyan tribes during the civil conflict, especially its latest round, which gives an idea of the complexity of the internal situation in Libya. The conclusion indicates the main reasons why Libya as a country cannot currently be a single and whole entity. The problem lies mainly in the complex ethnic and tribal situation as well as in the desire of individual tribes for an autonomous existence.","PeriodicalId":250882,"journal":{"name":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia provinciae – the journal of regional history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23859/2587-8344-2022-6-2-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the author analyzes one of the most difficult problems in the Arab region, the civil war in Libya after the overthrow of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The author focuses on the fresh round of the escalation of the conflict (2019–20) between the eastern and western centers of power. The paper presents the importance of the political positions of Libyan tribes in the course of hostilities and their impact on the internal situation. The key issue of the study considered in the article directly concerns the political positions of the main clans within Libya. The author explains why some of the clans decided to participate in the military campaign on the side of the Libyan National Army, while the other defended the Government of National Accord; there were also those who adopted the position of non-interference in national affairs, since they sought to maintain autonomy. The main purpose of this work is to demonstrate the specifics of the Libyan problem, which is not only the desire of Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and Fezzan for their autonomous existence but also the internal contradictions between different tribes. It remains one of the most important factors hindering the unification of the country. After analyzing the publications in the modern Arabic-language press, the author offered her vision of the reasons for the ongoing armed confrontation in Libya and also presented and analyzed the full range of political positions and the role of the main Libyan tribes during the civil conflict, especially its latest round, which gives an idea of the complexity of the internal situation in Libya. The conclusion indicates the main reasons why Libya as a country cannot currently be a single and whole entity. The problem lies mainly in the complex ethnic and tribal situation as well as in the desire of individual tribes for an autonomous existence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内战时期利比亚部落的政治立场(2019-2020)
在这篇文章中,作者分析了阿拉伯地区最棘手的问题之一,2011年穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲上校被推翻后的利比亚内战。作者关注的是东西方权力中心之间的新一轮冲突升级(2019-20)。本文介绍了利比亚部落的政治立场在敌对行动过程中的重要性及其对国内局势的影响。本文所考虑的研究的关键问题直接关系到利比亚主要部族的政治立场。作者解释了为什么有些部族决定站在利比亚国民军一边参加军事行动,而另一些部族则为民族和解政府辩护;也有一些人采取不干涉国家事务的立场,因为他们寻求保持自治。这部作品的主要目的是展示利比亚问题的特殊性,这不仅是的黎波里塔尼亚,昔兰尼加和费赞对自治存在的渴望,而且是不同部落之间的内部矛盾。它仍然是阻碍国家统一的最重要因素之一。在分析了现代阿拉伯语报刊上的出版物后,作者对利比亚持续武装对抗的原因提出了自己的看法,并对利比亚主要部落在国内冲突,特别是最近一轮冲突中的政治立场和作用进行了全方位的介绍和分析,从而了解了利比亚内部局势的复杂性。结论指出了利比亚作为一个国家目前不能成为一个单一和完整的实体的主要原因。问题主要在于复杂的民族和部落状况,以及个别部落对自治生存的渴望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foreign Connections of Hungarian Scouts (especially as Witnessed by the Journal Magyar Cserkész 1938/39) Sacred Topography of the City of Cherepovets, Novgorod Governorate: Peculiarities of Formation Ivan Aksakov on the “qualitative force” of the Russian people On the Reasons for the Negative Attitude of the Soviet Security Agencies towards the Home Army At the origins of the idea of the Caucasian Muslim confederation: on the union of Azerbaijan, Dagestan, and the Mountainous Republic in 1917–1918
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1