Diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders during pregnancy: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.

M. Power, S. Kilpatrick, J. Schulkin
{"title":"Diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders during pregnancy: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.","authors":"M. Power, S. Kilpatrick, J. Schulkin","doi":"10.1097/01.OGX.0000134240.62681.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo document the knowledge and clinical practice of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding their diagnosis and management of thyroid disorders during pregnancy.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nWe surveyed 1,392 practicing obstetrician-gynecologists about their knowledge and clinical practice of treating thyroid disorders during pregnancy; 569 of the surveys were returned. Of those, 441 respondents treated pregnant women and completed the entire survey.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA majority of respondents had treated patients for hypothyroidism (88.7%) and hyperthyroidism (60.5%) within the previous year. In general, respondents appeared to be well versed in the symptoms of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. Most respondents correctly predicted the likely results for thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine and total thyroxine for pregnant euthyroid, hyperthyroid and hypothyroid women, but about 50% appeared uncertain of the meaning of free thyroxine index. A majority (53.1%) of respondents considered their training during residency concerning thyroid disorders during pregnancy to be adequate, but few (7.5%) considered it to be comprehensive, and the remainder considered it barely adequate at best. Self-assessment of training and confidence regarding diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders during pregnancy were in concordance (r = .462 and r = .464, respectively; P < .001 in both cases).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThyroid disorders are commonly treated by obstetrician-gynecologists, and in general their practices for diagnosis and management conform to accepted practices. A sizable minority of responding obstetrician-gynecologists indicated that they considered their training to be inadequate and their confidence in diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders to be low.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"306 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000134240.62681.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To document the knowledge and clinical practice of obstetrician-gynecologists regarding their diagnosis and management of thyroid disorders during pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN We surveyed 1,392 practicing obstetrician-gynecologists about their knowledge and clinical practice of treating thyroid disorders during pregnancy; 569 of the surveys were returned. Of those, 441 respondents treated pregnant women and completed the entire survey. RESULTS A majority of respondents had treated patients for hypothyroidism (88.7%) and hyperthyroidism (60.5%) within the previous year. In general, respondents appeared to be well versed in the symptoms of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. Most respondents correctly predicted the likely results for thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine and total thyroxine for pregnant euthyroid, hyperthyroid and hypothyroid women, but about 50% appeared uncertain of the meaning of free thyroxine index. A majority (53.1%) of respondents considered their training during residency concerning thyroid disorders during pregnancy to be adequate, but few (7.5%) considered it to be comprehensive, and the remainder considered it barely adequate at best. Self-assessment of training and confidence regarding diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders during pregnancy were in concordance (r = .462 and r = .464, respectively; P < .001 in both cases). CONCLUSION Thyroid disorders are commonly treated by obstetrician-gynecologists, and in general their practices for diagnosis and management conform to accepted practices. A sizable minority of responding obstetrician-gynecologists indicated that they considered their training to be inadequate and their confidence in diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders to be low.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠期间甲状腺疾病的诊断和管理:一项妇产科医生的调查。
目的了解妇产科医生对妊娠期甲状腺疾病的诊断和处理的知识和临床实践。研究设计:对1392名在职妇产科医生进行妊娠期甲状腺疾病治疗知识和临床实践调查;共有569份调查被退回。其中,441名受访者治疗孕妇并完成了整个调查。结果大部分受访患者在前一年内治疗过甲状腺功能减退症(88.7%)和甲状腺功能亢进症(60.5%)。总的来说,受访者似乎精通甲状腺功能减退和甲状腺功能亢进的症状。大多数应答者正确预测了促甲状腺激素、游离甲状腺素和总甲状腺素对妊娠甲状腺功能正常、甲状腺功能亢进和甲状腺功能减退妇女的可能结果,但约50%的应答者对游离甲状腺素指数的含义不确定。大多数(53.1%)的受访者认为他们在住院医师期间关于妊娠期间甲状腺疾病的培训是足够的,但很少(7.5%)的人认为是全面的,其余的人认为充其量只是勉强足够。妊娠期甲状腺疾病诊断和管理的培训自我评估和信心一致(r = .462和r = .464);两种情况P < 0.001)。结论甲状腺疾病是妇产科医生治疗的常见病,其诊断和治疗方法基本符合常规。相当数量的少数妇产科医生表示,他们认为自己的培训不足,对诊断和治疗甲状腺疾病的信心很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia. Timing of Referral to the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center: Does Referral with Molar Pregnancy Versus Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Affect Outcomes? Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Blood Contaminated Amniotic Fluid and the Lamellar Body Count Fetal Lung Maturity Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1