{"title":"Felsefi Açıdan Siyaset ve Eğitim Yönetiminde Meşruiyet Kaynaklarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma","authors":"Turan Erman Kiliç","doi":"10.14582/duzgef.2021.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legitimacy of administrations in the context of politics and management philosophy is a controversial issue. In the historical development process, legitimacy has been shaped according to different social, economic and political phenomena. Legitimacy is still an important problem area for both politics and the administration of organizations. The main purpose of the study is to discuss the problems and sources of legitimacy in the context of management philosophy and politics according to different philosophies. For this purpose, the interpretation and problems of and approach to the sources of legitimacy of politics and educational administration in the literature were studied based on the literature review. This study is a literature review; it is designed based on systematic review and document analysis. Literature review is an academic process based on the review of related literature based on certain limitations. Literature review, as a research process, is enriched with critical review. Sources of legitimacy in the context of political philosophy are traditional, modern and political science sources of legitimacy. In this context, traditional sources of legitimacy are divided into three groups: religious, monarchic and oligarchic idealism. Modern legitimacy types, on the other hand, are grouped under three subtitles as republic, democratic republic and socialist republic. Legitimacy in terms of political science is in the form of state sovereignty, democratic state and realist state conceptions. In the study, the need for the state or the ruler, the question of who rules in politics and administration and the problem of legitimacy are discussed in terms of quality in the context of society (politics) and organizational management. In this context, it is determined that there is a need for a ruler; the ruling power differs according to the philosophical point of view and that politics and educational organizations differ in terms of legitimacy. It has been suggested to investigate the problem of legitimacy in terms of different philosophies and to conduct quantitative and qualitative studies based on different expert opinions.","PeriodicalId":168297,"journal":{"name":"Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14582/duzgef.2021.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The legitimacy of administrations in the context of politics and management philosophy is a controversial issue. In the historical development process, legitimacy has been shaped according to different social, economic and political phenomena. Legitimacy is still an important problem area for both politics and the administration of organizations. The main purpose of the study is to discuss the problems and sources of legitimacy in the context of management philosophy and politics according to different philosophies. For this purpose, the interpretation and problems of and approach to the sources of legitimacy of politics and educational administration in the literature were studied based on the literature review. This study is a literature review; it is designed based on systematic review and document analysis. Literature review is an academic process based on the review of related literature based on certain limitations. Literature review, as a research process, is enriched with critical review. Sources of legitimacy in the context of political philosophy are traditional, modern and political science sources of legitimacy. In this context, traditional sources of legitimacy are divided into three groups: religious, monarchic and oligarchic idealism. Modern legitimacy types, on the other hand, are grouped under three subtitles as republic, democratic republic and socialist republic. Legitimacy in terms of political science is in the form of state sovereignty, democratic state and realist state conceptions. In the study, the need for the state or the ruler, the question of who rules in politics and administration and the problem of legitimacy are discussed in terms of quality in the context of society (politics) and organizational management. In this context, it is determined that there is a need for a ruler; the ruling power differs according to the philosophical point of view and that politics and educational organizations differ in terms of legitimacy. It has been suggested to investigate the problem of legitimacy in terms of different philosophies and to conduct quantitative and qualitative studies based on different expert opinions.