Felsefi Açıdan Siyaset ve Eğitim Yönetiminde Meşruiyet Kaynaklarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma

Turan Erman Kiliç
{"title":"Felsefi Açıdan Siyaset ve Eğitim Yönetiminde Meşruiyet Kaynaklarına İlişkin Bir Araştırma","authors":"Turan Erman Kiliç","doi":"10.14582/duzgef.2021.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legitimacy of administrations in the context of politics and management philosophy is a controversial issue. In the historical development process, legitimacy has been shaped according to different social, economic and political phenomena. Legitimacy is still an important problem area for both politics and the administration of organizations. The main purpose of the study is to discuss the problems and sources of legitimacy in the context of management philosophy and politics according to different philosophies. For this purpose, the interpretation and problems of and approach to the sources of legitimacy of politics and educational administration in the literature were studied based on the literature review. This study is a literature review; it is designed based on systematic review and document analysis. Literature review is an academic process based on the review of related literature based on certain limitations. Literature review, as a research process, is enriched with critical review. Sources of legitimacy in the context of political philosophy are traditional, modern and political science sources of legitimacy. In this context, traditional sources of legitimacy are divided into three groups: religious, monarchic and oligarchic idealism. Modern legitimacy types, on the other hand, are grouped under three subtitles as republic, democratic republic and socialist republic. Legitimacy in terms of political science is in the form of state sovereignty, democratic state and realist state conceptions. In the study, the need for the state or the ruler, the question of who rules in politics and administration and the problem of legitimacy are discussed in terms of quality in the context of society (politics) and organizational management. In this context, it is determined that there is a need for a ruler; the ruling power differs according to the philosophical point of view and that politics and educational organizations differ in terms of legitimacy. It has been suggested to investigate the problem of legitimacy in terms of different philosophies and to conduct quantitative and qualitative studies based on different expert opinions.","PeriodicalId":168297,"journal":{"name":"Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14582/duzgef.2021.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legitimacy of administrations in the context of politics and management philosophy is a controversial issue. In the historical development process, legitimacy has been shaped according to different social, economic and political phenomena. Legitimacy is still an important problem area for both politics and the administration of organizations. The main purpose of the study is to discuss the problems and sources of legitimacy in the context of management philosophy and politics according to different philosophies. For this purpose, the interpretation and problems of and approach to the sources of legitimacy of politics and educational administration in the literature were studied based on the literature review. This study is a literature review; it is designed based on systematic review and document analysis. Literature review is an academic process based on the review of related literature based on certain limitations. Literature review, as a research process, is enriched with critical review. Sources of legitimacy in the context of political philosophy are traditional, modern and political science sources of legitimacy. In this context, traditional sources of legitimacy are divided into three groups: religious, monarchic and oligarchic idealism. Modern legitimacy types, on the other hand, are grouped under three subtitles as republic, democratic republic and socialist republic. Legitimacy in terms of political science is in the form of state sovereignty, democratic state and realist state conceptions. In the study, the need for the state or the ruler, the question of who rules in politics and administration and the problem of legitimacy are discussed in terms of quality in the context of society (politics) and organizational management. In this context, it is determined that there is a need for a ruler; the ruling power differs according to the philosophical point of view and that politics and educational organizations differ in terms of legitimacy. It has been suggested to investigate the problem of legitimacy in terms of different philosophies and to conduct quantitative and qualitative studies based on different expert opinions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从哲学角度研究政治和教育管理合法性的来源
在政治和管理哲学的背景下,政府的合法性是一个有争议的问题。在历史发展过程中,合法性是根据不同的社会、经济和政治现象而形成的。合法性仍然是政治和组织管理的一个重要问题领域。本研究的主要目的是根据不同的哲学,在管理哲学和政治的背景下讨论合法性的问题和来源。为此,在文献回顾的基础上,研究了文献中对政治和教育行政合法性来源的解释、问题和途径。本研究为文献综述;它是在系统回顾和文献分析的基础上设计的。文献综述是在一定局限性的基础上对相关文献进行综述的学术过程。文献综述作为一种研究过程,具有丰富的批判性综述。政治哲学语境中的合法性来源包括传统的、现代的和政治学的合法性来源。在这种背景下,传统的合法性来源分为三类:宗教、君主制和寡头理想主义。另一方面,现代合法性类型分为共和国、民主共和国和社会主义共和国三个副标题。政治学意义上的合法性表现为国家主权、民主国家和现实主义国家概念。在研究中,从社会(政治)和组织管理的角度讨论了国家或统治者的需要,谁在政治和行政中统治的问题以及合法性问题。在这种情况下,确定需要一个统治者;统治权力的不同取决于哲学观点,政治和教育组织的合法性不同。有人建议从不同的哲学角度来研究合法性问题,并根据不同的专家意见进行定量和定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmen Adaylarının 3 Boyutlu Modelleme Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi Çocuğu Tanıma ve Değerlendirme Sürecine İlişkin Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi Okul Öncesi Öğretmenlerinin Web 2.0 Araçlarının Kullanımına İlişkin Deneyimleri Examining University Experiences of Students with Special Needs Çevrimiçi Forum Yazarlarının Bakış Açısından Türkiye de Müzik ve Müzik Eğitiminin Görünümü
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1