The Genesis of National Park Management: John Roberts White and Sequoia National Park, 1920–1947

Rick Hydrick
{"title":"The Genesis of National Park Management: John Roberts White and Sequoia National Park, 1920–1947","authors":"Rick Hydrick","doi":"10.2307/4004773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he administrative principles of Stephen T. Mather, first director of the National Park Service, are the foundation for the park system's successes. Mather and his successors, Horace M. Albright and Arno B. Cammerer, believed with missionary zeal that expanding and opening the parks to the public through good roads, trails, and accommodations would not only save these scenic wonders but would convince the government and the public of their inestimable economic, patriotic, educational, recreational, and, later, environmental values. With the businesslike optimism of a marketing salesman, Mather declared that \"our national parks are practically lying fallow, and only await proper development to bring them into their own.\"1 Historians, having accepted the importance of Mather and his successors, have dealt mainly with the formulation of park policy at the national level. This approach has yielded important insights into the evolution of the \"national park idea\" but has left other questions unexplored. For instance, who were the so-called Mather men directing development in each of the parks? How did they translate the Mather tradition into individual park policies? And most important, how did the Mather tradition inspire and invigorate park development on a local level?2 Park historian William C. Everhart has drawn an analogy between the individual park superintendent and the","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

T he administrative principles of Stephen T. Mather, first director of the National Park Service, are the foundation for the park system's successes. Mather and his successors, Horace M. Albright and Arno B. Cammerer, believed with missionary zeal that expanding and opening the parks to the public through good roads, trails, and accommodations would not only save these scenic wonders but would convince the government and the public of their inestimable economic, patriotic, educational, recreational, and, later, environmental values. With the businesslike optimism of a marketing salesman, Mather declared that "our national parks are practically lying fallow, and only await proper development to bring them into their own."1 Historians, having accepted the importance of Mather and his successors, have dealt mainly with the formulation of park policy at the national level. This approach has yielded important insights into the evolution of the "national park idea" but has left other questions unexplored. For instance, who were the so-called Mather men directing development in each of the parks? How did they translate the Mather tradition into individual park policies? And most important, how did the Mather tradition inspire and invigorate park development on a local level?2 Park historian William C. Everhart has drawn an analogy between the individual park superintendent and the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家公园管理的起源:约翰·罗伯茨·怀特和红杉国家公园,1920-1947
国家公园管理局第一任局长斯蒂芬·T·马瑟(Stephen T. Mather)的管理原则是公园系统成功的基础。马瑟和他的继任者霍勒斯·m·奥尔布赖特(Horace M. Albright)和阿诺·b·卡默勒(Arno B. Cammerer)怀着传教士般的热情相信,通过良好的道路、步道和住宿设施,扩大公园并向公众开放,不仅能拯救这些风景秀丽的奇观,还能使政府和公众相信它们不可估量的经济、爱国、教育、娱乐以及后来的环境价值。马瑟以一种营销人员的务实乐观态度宣称:“我们的国家公园实际上处于休耕状态,只等待适当的开发,使它们成为自己的公园。”历史学家已经承认了马瑟及其继任者的重要性,他们主要研究的是国家层面上公园政策的制定。这种方法为“国家公园理念”的演变提供了重要的见解,但也留下了其他未探索的问题。例如,谁是所谓的“马瑟人”,指导每个公园的发展?他们是如何将马瑟传统转化为个别公园政策的?最重要的是,马瑟的传统是如何启发和激励当地公园发展的?公园历史学家威廉·c·埃弗哈特(William C. Everhart)在个别公园管理员和公园管理员之间作了类比
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Builders of the U.S. Biological Survey, 1885–1930 Brighter and Dimmer Analytic Lights in the Wilderness Bread Forests and New Fields: The Ecology of Reforestation and Forest Clearing among Small-Woodland Owners in Portugal The Many Forms of Outdoor Recreation Lead to Many Books Bill and the Boss: Labor Protest, Technological Change, and the Transformation of the West Coast Logging Camp, 1890–1930
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1