Student consultation strategies as a lever for school improvement. Results of a collaborative study / Estrategias de consulta al alumnado como palanca para la mejora escolar. Resultados de una investigación colaborativa

Noelia Ceballos-López, Adelina Calvo-Salvador, Ignacio Haya-Salmón
{"title":"Student consultation strategies as a lever for school improvement. Results of a collaborative study / Estrategias de consulta al alumnado como palanca para la mejora escolar. Resultados de una investigación colaborativa","authors":"Noelia Ceballos-López, Adelina Calvo-Salvador, Ignacio Haya-Salmón","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents the results of a study carried out in nine schools in Cantabria (Spain) over a five-year period under the Student Voice philosophy. Experiences are described in early childhood and primary and secondary education, as well as in ‘second chance contexts’. The study has been carried out within a qualitative-collaborative framework using ethnographic data collection techniques (semi-structured interviews, participant observations and images). The analysis was conducted using a system of categories and codes compiled according to inductive and deductive processes with the MAXQDA qualitative analysis program. Specifically, the Student Consultation Phase carried out in all the schools is analysed in order to ensure that all students participate and are heard, including those who have tended to have greater difficulties or less presence in school. A review is carried out of the consultation strategies used, the means of communication (languages) and the issues that have been the focus of dialogue and improvements: curricular developments, coexistence, the design of spaces and classroom management. We conclude that reflection on curricular matters tends to be scarce, and that adults still have a significant presence in the management of the dialogue process, which needs to be directed more by children and young people.","PeriodicalId":153832,"journal":{"name":"Cultura y Educación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultura y Educación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1656937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the results of a study carried out in nine schools in Cantabria (Spain) over a five-year period under the Student Voice philosophy. Experiences are described in early childhood and primary and secondary education, as well as in ‘second chance contexts’. The study has been carried out within a qualitative-collaborative framework using ethnographic data collection techniques (semi-structured interviews, participant observations and images). The analysis was conducted using a system of categories and codes compiled according to inductive and deductive processes with the MAXQDA qualitative analysis program. Specifically, the Student Consultation Phase carried out in all the schools is analysed in order to ensure that all students participate and are heard, including those who have tended to have greater difficulties or less presence in school. A review is carried out of the consultation strategies used, the means of communication (languages) and the issues that have been the focus of dialogue and improvements: curricular developments, coexistence, the design of spaces and classroom management. We conclude that reflection on curricular matters tends to be scarce, and that adults still have a significant presence in the management of the dialogue process, which needs to be directed more by children and young people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生谘询策略是改善学校的杠杆。合作研究的结果/学生咨询策略作为学校改善的杠杆。合作研究的结果
本文介绍了在坎塔布里亚(西班牙)的九所学校进行的一项为期五年的学生之声哲学研究的结果。在儿童早期、小学和中学教育以及“第二次机会环境”中描述经验。这项研究是在定性合作框架内进行的,使用了民族志数据收集技术(半结构化访谈、参与者观察和图像)。采用MAXQDA定性分析程序,根据归纳和演绎过程编制的分类和代码系统进行分析。具体而言,在所有学校进行的学生咨询阶段进行了分析,以确保所有学生参与并听取意见,包括那些往往有较大困难或较少出现在学校的学生。对所使用的协商战略、交流手段(语言)以及一直是对话和改进重点的问题进行了审查:课程发展、共存、空间设计和教室管理。我们的结论是,对课程问题的反思往往很少,成年人在对话进程的管理中仍然发挥着重要作用,对话进程需要更多地由儿童和年轻人来指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The participation of Roma and Moroccan women in family education: educational and psychosocial benefits / Participación de mujeres gitanas y marroquíes en la formación de familiares: beneficios educativos y psicosociales Evaluation of videos of mathematical concepts made by students / Evaluación de vídeos de conceptos matemáticos elaborados por los estudiantes Perceptions of knowledge and use of languages of indigenous and immigrant students in Basque schools / Percepción del conocimiento y uso de lenguas entre alumnado autóctono e inmigrante en la escuela vasca What do preschool students want? The role of formative and shared assessment in their right to decide / ¿Qué quieren los niños y niñas de Educación Infantil? El papel de la evaluación formativa y compartida en su derecho a decidir Empirical approach from lexical availability to the influence of sociolinguistic factors on mastery of spelling / Aproximación empírica desde la disponibilidad léxica a la influencia de los factores sociolingüísticos en el dominio ortográfico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1