Tae Il Kim, H. Jeong, Jeong-Eun Song, H. Kim, Jimin Han
{"title":"Differences in Clinical Features between Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis and Other Etiologies of Acute Pancreatitis","authors":"Tae Il Kim, H. Jeong, Jeong-Eun Song, H. Kim, Jimin Han","doi":"10.15279/kpba.2022.27.2.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare clinical features of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGAP) with those of biliary acute pancreatitis (BAP) and alcoholic acute pancreatitis (AAP), respectively.Methods: Medical records of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who were admitted to our institution from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease severity and local complications were evaluated according to the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Systemic complications were evaluated according to the Modified Marshall Scoring System.Results: Of the total 610 patients with AP, those with BAP, AAP, and HTGAP were 310 (50.8%), 144 (23.6%), and 17 (2.8%), respectively. Compared with BAP, HTGAP showed higher proportion of moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) (64.7% vs. 28.1%, p<0.001) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p <0.001). And HTGAP showed more local complications (76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001) and higher recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference in systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140). Contrarily, there was no significant difference between HTGAP and AAP with respect to disease severity (64.7% vs. 63.9% in MSAP and 17.6% vs. 6.9% in SAP, p =0.181), local complications (76.5% vs. 67.4%, p =0.445), recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 32.6%, p =0.096), and systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.5%, p =0.233).Conclusions: HTGAP showed higher disease severity, more local complications, and higher recurrence rate than BAP. However, there was no significant difference in clinical features between HTGAP and BAP.","PeriodicalId":342618,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15279/kpba.2022.27.2.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare clinical features of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGAP) with those of biliary acute pancreatitis (BAP) and alcoholic acute pancreatitis (AAP), respectively.Methods: Medical records of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who were admitted to our institution from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease severity and local complications were evaluated according to the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Systemic complications were evaluated according to the Modified Marshall Scoring System.Results: Of the total 610 patients with AP, those with BAP, AAP, and HTGAP were 310 (50.8%), 144 (23.6%), and 17 (2.8%), respectively. Compared with BAP, HTGAP showed higher proportion of moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) (64.7% vs. 28.1%, p<0.001) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p <0.001). And HTGAP showed more local complications (76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001) and higher recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference in systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140). Contrarily, there was no significant difference between HTGAP and AAP with respect to disease severity (64.7% vs. 63.9% in MSAP and 17.6% vs. 6.9% in SAP, p =0.181), local complications (76.5% vs. 67.4%, p =0.445), recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 32.6%, p =0.096), and systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.5%, p =0.233).Conclusions: HTGAP showed higher disease severity, more local complications, and higher recurrence rate than BAP. However, there was no significant difference in clinical features between HTGAP and BAP.
背景/目的:本研究的目的是比较高甘油三酯血症引起的急性胰腺炎(HTGAP)与胆源性急性胰腺炎(BAP)和酒精性急性胰腺炎(AAP)的临床特征。方法:回顾性分析我院2014年1月至2018年12月收治的急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的医疗记录。疾病严重程度和局部并发症根据2012年修订的亚特兰大分类进行评估。根据改良马歇尔评分系统评估全身并发症。结果:610例AP患者中,BAP 310例(50.8%),AAP 144例(23.6%),HTGAP 17例(2.8%)。与BAP相比,HTGAP显示中重度急性胰腺炎(MSAP)(64.7%比28.1%,p<0.001)和重度急性胰腺炎(SAP)(17.6%比5.5%,p<0.001)的比例更高。HTGAP的局部并发症较多(76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001),复发率较高(52.9% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001),但全身并发症无显著性差异(23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140)。相反,HTGAP和AAP在疾病严重程度(MSAP为64.7%比63.9%,SAP为17.6%比6.9%,p =0.181)、局部并发症(76.5%比67.4%,p =0.445)、复发率(52.9%比32.6%,p =0.096)和全身并发症(23.5%比11.5%,p =0.233)方面无显著差异。结论:HTGAP比BAP有更高的疾病严重程度、更多的局部并发症和更高的复发率。然而,HTGAP与BAP的临床特征无显著差异。