Differences in Clinical Features between Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis and Other Etiologies of Acute Pancreatitis

Tae Il Kim, H. Jeong, Jeong-Eun Song, H. Kim, Jimin Han
{"title":"Differences in Clinical Features between Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis and Other Etiologies of Acute Pancreatitis","authors":"Tae Il Kim, H. Jeong, Jeong-Eun Song, H. Kim, Jimin Han","doi":"10.15279/kpba.2022.27.2.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare clinical features of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGAP) with those of biliary acute pancreatitis (BAP) and alcoholic acute pancreatitis (AAP), respectively.Methods: Medical records of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who were admitted to our institution from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease severity and local complications were evaluated according to the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Systemic complications were evaluated according to the Modified Marshall Scoring System.Results: Of the total 610 patients with AP, those with BAP, AAP, and HTGAP were 310 (50.8%), 144 (23.6%), and 17 (2.8%), respectively. Compared with BAP, HTGAP showed higher proportion of moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) (64.7% vs. 28.1%, p<0.001) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p <0.001). And HTGAP showed more local complications (76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001) and higher recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference in systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140). Contrarily, there was no significant difference between HTGAP and AAP with respect to disease severity (64.7% vs. 63.9% in MSAP and 17.6% vs. 6.9% in SAP, p =0.181), local complications (76.5% vs. 67.4%, p =0.445), recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 32.6%, p =0.096), and systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.5%, p =0.233).Conclusions: HTGAP showed higher disease severity, more local complications, and higher recurrence rate than BAP. However, there was no significant difference in clinical features between HTGAP and BAP.","PeriodicalId":342618,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Pancreas and Biliary Tract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15279/kpba.2022.27.2.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to compare clinical features of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis (HTGAP) with those of biliary acute pancreatitis (BAP) and alcoholic acute pancreatitis (AAP), respectively.Methods: Medical records of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who were admitted to our institution from January 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease severity and local complications were evaluated according to the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Systemic complications were evaluated according to the Modified Marshall Scoring System.Results: Of the total 610 patients with AP, those with BAP, AAP, and HTGAP were 310 (50.8%), 144 (23.6%), and 17 (2.8%), respectively. Compared with BAP, HTGAP showed higher proportion of moderately severe acute pancreatitis (MSAP) (64.7% vs. 28.1%, p<0.001) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) (17.6% vs. 5.5%, p <0.001). And HTGAP showed more local complications (76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001) and higher recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 6.5%, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference in systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140). Contrarily, there was no significant difference between HTGAP and AAP with respect to disease severity (64.7% vs. 63.9% in MSAP and 17.6% vs. 6.9% in SAP, p =0.181), local complications (76.5% vs. 67.4%, p =0.445), recurrence rate (52.9% vs. 32.6%, p =0.096), and systemic complications (23.5% vs. 11.5%, p =0.233).Conclusions: HTGAP showed higher disease severity, more local complications, and higher recurrence rate than BAP. However, there was no significant difference in clinical features between HTGAP and BAP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高甘油三酯血症引起的急性胰腺炎与其他病因引起的急性胰腺炎临床特征的差异
背景/目的:本研究的目的是比较高甘油三酯血症引起的急性胰腺炎(HTGAP)与胆源性急性胰腺炎(BAP)和酒精性急性胰腺炎(AAP)的临床特征。方法:回顾性分析我院2014年1月至2018年12月收治的急性胰腺炎(AP)患者的医疗记录。疾病严重程度和局部并发症根据2012年修订的亚特兰大分类进行评估。根据改良马歇尔评分系统评估全身并发症。结果:610例AP患者中,BAP 310例(50.8%),AAP 144例(23.6%),HTGAP 17例(2.8%)。与BAP相比,HTGAP显示中重度急性胰腺炎(MSAP)(64.7%比28.1%,p<0.001)和重度急性胰腺炎(SAP)(17.6%比5.5%,p<0.001)的比例更高。HTGAP的局部并发症较多(76.5% vs. 26.8%, p<0.001),复发率较高(52.9% vs. 6.5%, p<0.001),但全身并发症无显著性差异(23.5% vs. 11.6%, p =0.140)。相反,HTGAP和AAP在疾病严重程度(MSAP为64.7%比63.9%,SAP为17.6%比6.9%,p =0.181)、局部并发症(76.5%比67.4%,p =0.445)、复发率(52.9%比32.6%,p =0.096)和全身并发症(23.5%比11.5%,p =0.233)方面无显著差异。结论:HTGAP比BAP有更高的疾病严重程度、更多的局部并发症和更高的复发率。然而,HTGAP与BAP的临床特征无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhagic Acalculous Cholecystitis in Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Patient Mechanistic Loop Resolution Strategy for Short-Type Single-Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Ursodeoxycholic Acid Suppresses Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Inhibition of Reactive Oxygen Species in Bile Duct Cancer Cells The First Case Report of Ketamine-Induced Cholangiopathy in Korea Atypical Presentation of Cat-Scratch Disease Mimicking Malignancy: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1