How good is my feedback?: a content analysis of written feedback

Anderson Pinheiro Cavalcanti, A. Diego, R. F. Mello, Katerina Mangaroska, André C. A. Nascimento, F. Freitas, D. Gašević
{"title":"How good is my feedback?: a content analysis of written feedback","authors":"Anderson Pinheiro Cavalcanti, A. Diego, R. F. Mello, Katerina Mangaroska, André C. A. Nascimento, F. Freitas, D. Gašević","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback is a crucial element in helping students identify gaps and assess their learning progress. In online courses, feedback becomes even more critical as it is one of the resources where the teacher interacts directly with the student. However, with the growing number of students enrolled in online learning, it becomes a challenge for instructors to provide good quality feedback that helps the student self-regulate. In this context, this paper proposed a content analysis of feedback text provided by instructors based on different indicators of good feedback. A random forest classifier was trained and evaluated at different feedback levels. The results achieved outcomes up to 87% and 0.39 of accuracy and Cohen's κ, respectively. The paper also provides insights into the most influential textual features of feedback that predict feedback quality.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Feedback is a crucial element in helping students identify gaps and assess their learning progress. In online courses, feedback becomes even more critical as it is one of the resources where the teacher interacts directly with the student. However, with the growing number of students enrolled in online learning, it becomes a challenge for instructors to provide good quality feedback that helps the student self-regulate. In this context, this paper proposed a content analysis of feedback text provided by instructors based on different indicators of good feedback. A random forest classifier was trained and evaluated at different feedback levels. The results achieved outcomes up to 87% and 0.39 of accuracy and Cohen's κ, respectively. The paper also provides insights into the most influential textual features of feedback that predict feedback quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我的反馈有多好?内容分析:书面反馈
反馈是帮助学生发现差距和评估学习进度的关键因素。在在线课程中,反馈变得更加重要,因为它是教师直接与学生互动的资源之一。然而,随着越来越多的学生参加在线学习,教师提供高质量的反馈,帮助学生自我调节成为一个挑战。在此背景下,本文根据良好反馈的不同指标,对教师反馈文本进行了内容分析。对随机森林分类器进行了训练,并在不同的反馈水平上进行了评估。结果分别达到87%和0.39的准确率和科恩κ。本文还提供了最具影响力的文本特征,反馈预测反馈质量的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How working memory capacity limits success in self-directed learning: a cognitive model of search and concept formation Quantifying data sensitivity: precise demonstration of care when building student prediction models Towards automated analysis of cognitive presence in MOOC discussions: a manual classification study Towards automatic cross-language classification of cognitive presence in online discussions What college students say, and what they do: aligning self-regulated learning theory with behavioral logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1