The Management of Theft and Vandalism on Construction Jobsites in the Southern Region of Malawi

W. Simukonda, N. Kamwela
{"title":"The Management of Theft and Vandalism on Construction Jobsites in the Southern Region of Malawi","authors":"W. Simukonda, N. Kamwela","doi":"10.15641/jcbm.5.1.1072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The phenomenon of theft and vandalism on construction job sites in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has not been fully explored to guarantee the implementation of evidence-based security management practices (SMPs) to minimise losses and improve projects' profitability margins. This study investigated the management of theft and vandalism by large contractors in the Southern Region of Malawi to identify implementation issues that need improvement. A quantitative approach using an empirical survey-based questionnaire was adopted. 44 SMPs identified from the literature review were tested by data collected from a sample survey of 40 large contractors in the Southern Region of Malawi. The descriptive statistical method of mean score ranking was used to analyse the data through IBM Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Among the five-point Likert scale agreement measurements used, 11 SMPs were found to be \"always used\", 12 SMPs \"often used\", 15 SMPs \"sometimes used\", and six SMPs \"rarely used\". Overall, the top three highly ranked SMPs (in descending order) were inventorying construction materials, tools and equipment, termination of employment for offenders, and reporting theft and vandalism to enforcement agencies. Contrariwise, the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV), alarm systems and access control systems (ACS) was the least ranked SMPs. The contractors’ management improvements for theft and vandalism would need to focus on implementing proactive anti-theft and anti-vandalism SMPs whose choice should be informed by comprehensive Jobsite security risk assessment. Dissemination of the results may help contractors understand their security management strategies and implement practical solutions for curbing theft and vandalism on job sites to minimise its endemic effect on contractors’ financial performance.","PeriodicalId":149221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Construction Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15641/jcbm.5.1.1072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The phenomenon of theft and vandalism on construction job sites in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has not been fully explored to guarantee the implementation of evidence-based security management practices (SMPs) to minimise losses and improve projects' profitability margins. This study investigated the management of theft and vandalism by large contractors in the Southern Region of Malawi to identify implementation issues that need improvement. A quantitative approach using an empirical survey-based questionnaire was adopted. 44 SMPs identified from the literature review were tested by data collected from a sample survey of 40 large contractors in the Southern Region of Malawi. The descriptive statistical method of mean score ranking was used to analyse the data through IBM Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Among the five-point Likert scale agreement measurements used, 11 SMPs were found to be "always used", 12 SMPs "often used", 15 SMPs "sometimes used", and six SMPs "rarely used". Overall, the top three highly ranked SMPs (in descending order) were inventorying construction materials, tools and equipment, termination of employment for offenders, and reporting theft and vandalism to enforcement agencies. Contrariwise, the use of closed-circuit television (CCTV), alarm systems and access control systems (ACS) was the least ranked SMPs. The contractors’ management improvements for theft and vandalism would need to focus on implementing proactive anti-theft and anti-vandalism SMPs whose choice should be informed by comprehensive Jobsite security risk assessment. Dissemination of the results may help contractors understand their security management strategies and implement practical solutions for curbing theft and vandalism on job sites to minimise its endemic effect on contractors’ financial performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马拉维南部地区建筑工地盗窃和破坏行为的管理
撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)建筑工地的盗窃和破坏现象尚未得到充分探讨,以确保实施基于证据的安全管理实践(SMPs),以最大限度地减少损失并提高项目的利润率。本研究调查了马拉维南部地区大型承包商对盗窃和破坏行为的管理,以确定需要改进的执行问题。采用实证调查问卷的定量方法。通过对马拉维南部地区40家大型承包商的抽样调查收集的数据,对文献综述中确定的44家smp进行了检验。采用均分排序的描述性统计方法,通过IBM社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) 20.0版本对数据进行分析。在李克特量表的5点一致性测量中,发现11个smp是“经常使用”,12个smp是“经常使用”,15个smp是“有时使用”,6个smp是“很少使用”。总体而言,排名前三的smp(按降序排列)是盘点建筑材料、工具和设备、终止违法者的雇佣,以及向执法机构报告盗窃和破坏行为。相反,使用闭路电视(CCTV)、报警系统和访问控制系统(ACS)是排名最低的smp。承包商对盗窃和破坏行为的管理改进需要侧重于实施主动的防盗和反破坏smp,其选择应根据全面的工地安全风险评估。公布调查结果,有助承建商了解他们的保安管理策略,并采取切实可行的措施,遏止工地上的盗窃和破坏行为,以减低其对承建商财务表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Awareness and Barriers to the Application of Lean Construction Techniques in Kano State, Nigeria Sustainable Construction Transition (SCT) Policy Regime in Kenya A Measure of Combustion-Generated Pollutants in University Laboratories and their Effects on the Indoor Air Quality Contributing Elements and Issues to Strategic Management in the Construction Industry Among Small and Medium Enterprises: A Case Study in South Africa's eThekwini Region Evaluation of compliance of concreting materials to standards in building projects in Lagos State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1