Memory for the source of solutions in remote associate tasks: The role of generation effect and the Aha!-experience

V. Gershkovich, N. Moroshkina, V. Fedosova
{"title":"Memory for the source of solutions in remote associate tasks: The role of generation effect and the Aha!-experience","authors":"V. Gershkovich, N. Moroshkina, V. Fedosova","doi":"10.21638/SPBU16.2021.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current work is to study the role of the Aha!-experience in remembering the source of solutions, either self-generated or externally presented. In memory studies there are specific source-monitoring errors, which occur whenever a participant claims to have generated an idea that was derived from different sources (unconscious plagiarism). Several previous studies have shown that experiencing the feeling of Aha! during either problem-solving or the presentation of the correct solutions can have a beneficial relationship to the subsequent recall of the material with the processing of which it was associated. However, studies of the Aha!-experience on the source monitoring task (self-generated solutions vs presented solutions) have not been conducted. In the authors’ study, the hypothesis that the feeling of Aha!, associated with the task being solved, can affect source-monitoring accuracy. During the first stage of the experiment, participants (80 people) had to solve Compound Remote Associates Task items and to estimate whether they had a feeling of Aha!, when either generating the solution or being presented with it in case they failed to generate it. At the second stage, conducted a week later, participants had to recall if the solution was generated by themselves or just presented. The results confirm the generation effect, which manifests itself in successfully recalling problems for which a solution was found (sufficient generation) compared to problems with no-solutions found (fail-to-generate). Participants quite accurately recognized the source of the solution a week later, attributing generated solutions to themselves, while attributing fail-to-generate solutions to the presented ones. However, the authors did not find any additional impact of the Aha!-experience on the problem’s recognition, nor on the sourcemonitoring task performance. In the conclusion of the article, the contradictions of different experimental data concerning the influence of the Aha!-experience on long-term memory and further areas of research is discussed.","PeriodicalId":388528,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/SPBU16.2021.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the current work is to study the role of the Aha!-experience in remembering the source of solutions, either self-generated or externally presented. In memory studies there are specific source-monitoring errors, which occur whenever a participant claims to have generated an idea that was derived from different sources (unconscious plagiarism). Several previous studies have shown that experiencing the feeling of Aha! during either problem-solving or the presentation of the correct solutions can have a beneficial relationship to the subsequent recall of the material with the processing of which it was associated. However, studies of the Aha!-experience on the source monitoring task (self-generated solutions vs presented solutions) have not been conducted. In the authors’ study, the hypothesis that the feeling of Aha!, associated with the task being solved, can affect source-monitoring accuracy. During the first stage of the experiment, participants (80 people) had to solve Compound Remote Associates Task items and to estimate whether they had a feeling of Aha!, when either generating the solution or being presented with it in case they failed to generate it. At the second stage, conducted a week later, participants had to recall if the solution was generated by themselves or just presented. The results confirm the generation effect, which manifests itself in successfully recalling problems for which a solution was found (sufficient generation) compared to problems with no-solutions found (fail-to-generate). Participants quite accurately recognized the source of the solution a week later, attributing generated solutions to themselves, while attributing fail-to-generate solutions to the presented ones. However, the authors did not find any additional impact of the Aha!-experience on the problem’s recognition, nor on the sourcemonitoring task performance. In the conclusion of the article, the contradictions of different experimental data concerning the influence of the Aha!-experience on long-term memory and further areas of research is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程关联任务中解决方案源的内存:生成效应的作用和Aha!经验
当前工作的目的是研究Aha!-记住解决方案来源的经验,无论是自己产生的还是外部呈现的。在记忆研究中存在特定的来源监控错误,每当参与者声称自己产生了一个来自不同来源的想法(无意识剽窃)时,就会发生这种错误。之前的几项研究表明,体验“啊哈!”无论是在解决问题的过程中,还是在提出正确的解决方案的过程中,对随后回忆起与之相关的材料都有有益的关系。然而,对Aha!-没有对源监控任务(自生成的解决方案与呈现的解决方案)进行经验。在作者的研究中,假设“啊哈!”,与正在解决的任务相关联,可能会影响源监视的准确性。在实验的第一阶段,参与者(80人)必须解决复合远程联系任务项目,并估计他们是否有一种“啊哈!”的感觉。,要么是在生成解决方案,要么是在他们无法生成解决方案的情况下向他们展示解决方案。在一周后进行的第二阶段,参与者必须回忆这个解决方案是他们自己想出的,还是刚刚提出的。结果证实了生成效应,这表现在成功地回忆起找到解决方案的问题(充分生成),而没有找到解决方案的问题(未能生成)。参与者在一周后相当准确地识别出了解决方案的来源,将生成的解决方案归因于自己,而将无法生成的解决方案归因于所呈现的解决方案。然而,作者并没有发现Aha!-问题识别的经验,而不是源监控任务性能的经验。在文章的结论中,不同实验数据的矛盾关系对Aha!讨论了长期记忆的经验和进一步的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of the characteristics of patients with coronary heart disease of middle and older age with different dynamics of cognitive functioning during rehabilitation after coronary bypass surgery Productive and unproductive patterns of metacognitive regulation of intellectual performance Competence and PCC approach: opportunities and limitations Psychological idiosyncratic of rebuses as cognitive sense understanding tacks Preliminary adaptation of the Russian version of the TEMPS-A questionnaire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1