Interpreting posts in empathic games: assumptions for a conceptual framework

Danilo Barros dos Santos, T. Pinheiro, Cristiano Maciel, Kamila R. H. Rodrigues, Eunice P. dos Santos Nunes
{"title":"Interpreting posts in empathic games: assumptions for a conceptual framework","authors":"Danilo Barros dos Santos, T. Pinheiro, Cristiano Maciel, Kamila R. H. Rodrigues, Eunice P. dos Santos Nunes","doi":"10.1145/3424953.3426635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Games are part of a profitable market, with constant innovations and new technologies to meet users' needs. The understanding of elements related to games is a challenge, especially empathic games, i.e., those that foster users' empathy. This category of games makes users think over delicate and moving themes. This study aims at human interpretations of different sorts of data from discussion forums on empathic games. To do so, we considered ratings of user comments analyzed in previous research with two games, \"That Dragon, Cancer\" and \"Valiant Heart\", and we used an analysis tool. The data patterns allowed theories to emerge, and also allowed us to analyze users' profiles and comments, by reorganizing the previously proposed categories, but now based on assumptions of Grounded Theory. The methodological path points out ways in which the interpretation of the data proved to be useful for the future development of a conceptual framework for creating and evaluating this kind of game.","PeriodicalId":102113,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Games are part of a profitable market, with constant innovations and new technologies to meet users' needs. The understanding of elements related to games is a challenge, especially empathic games, i.e., those that foster users' empathy. This category of games makes users think over delicate and moving themes. This study aims at human interpretations of different sorts of data from discussion forums on empathic games. To do so, we considered ratings of user comments analyzed in previous research with two games, "That Dragon, Cancer" and "Valiant Heart", and we used an analysis tool. The data patterns allowed theories to emerge, and also allowed us to analyze users' profiles and comments, by reorganizing the previously proposed categories, but now based on assumptions of Grounded Theory. The methodological path points out ways in which the interpretation of the data proved to be useful for the future development of a conceptual framework for creating and evaluating this kind of game.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读移情游戏中的职位:概念框架的假设
游戏是盈利市场的一部分,需要不断创新和新技术来满足用户需求。理解与游戏相关的元素是一个挑战,特别是移情游戏,即那些培养用户移情的游戏。这类游戏让用户思考微妙而感人的主题。本研究旨在探讨人类对共情游戏论坛中不同类型数据的解读。为此,我们考虑了之前对两款游戏(《That Dragon, Cancer》和《Valiant Heart》)的研究中分析的用户评论评级,并使用了一种分析工具。数据模式允许理论出现,也允许我们分析用户的个人资料和评论,通过重新组织之前提出的类别,但现在基于扎根理论的假设。方法论路径指出了对数据的解释对于创造和评估这类游戏的概念框架的未来发展是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX trek: a post-interaction journey from immersive experience logs Possibilities for the digital literacy of the older people in times of social distancing App coronavírus-SUS: an evalution using the ergonomic criteria of usability Beauty tech nails: towards interaction and functionality ChartVision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1