Continuous and Collaborative Validation: A Field Study of Requirements Knowledge in Agile

R. Gallardo-Valencia, S. Sim
{"title":"Continuous and Collaborative Validation: A Field Study of Requirements Knowledge in Agile","authors":"R. Gallardo-Valencia, S. Sim","doi":"10.1109/MARK.2009.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the results of our field study that describe how requirements validation was performed at an industrial software company using agile software practices. As is common in agile processes, the team did not capture requirements knowledge in a comprehensive specification document. Instead, requirements knowledge was captured in user stories, automated acceptance tests, personal notes, and conversations. Validation was performed continuously, during preiteration, iteration planning, and intra iteration using mainly conversations. Validation was also collaborative and involved all team members, including the Product Owner, programmers, and testers. The results of our field study have implications for both agile and validation methods. This successful arrangement of agile practices is instructive for agile practitioners and for researchers studying validation.","PeriodicalId":143105,"journal":{"name":"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Second International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.2009.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

We present the results of our field study that describe how requirements validation was performed at an industrial software company using agile software practices. As is common in agile processes, the team did not capture requirements knowledge in a comprehensive specification document. Instead, requirements knowledge was captured in user stories, automated acceptance tests, personal notes, and conversations. Validation was performed continuously, during preiteration, iteration planning, and intra iteration using mainly conversations. Validation was also collaborative and involved all team members, including the Product Owner, programmers, and testers. The results of our field study have implications for both agile and validation methods. This successful arrangement of agile practices is instructive for agile practitioners and for researchers studying validation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续和协作验证:敏捷需求知识的实地研究
我们展示了我们的实地研究结果,描述了如何在一个使用敏捷软件实践的工业软件公司中执行需求验证。正如在敏捷过程中常见的那样,团队没有在全面的规范文档中获取需求知识。相反,需求知识是在用户描述、自动化验收测试、个人笔记和对话中获取的。在预迭代、迭代计划和主要使用对话的内部迭代期间,验证被连续地执行。验证也是协作性的,所有团队成员都参与其中,包括产品负责人、程序员和测试人员。我们的实地研究结果对敏捷和验证方法都有启示。这种成功的敏捷实践安排对敏捷实践者和研究验证的研究人员具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Domain Knowledge Wiki for Eliciting Requirements On Presuppositions in Requirements The Papyrus Tool as an Eclipse UML2-modeling Environment for Requirements Luhmann's Slip Box -- What can we Learn from the Device for Knowledge Representation in Requirements Engineering? A Machine Learning Approach for Identifying Expert Stakeholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1