Utilizing Learning Analytics to Map Students' Self-Reported Study Strategies to Click Behaviors in STEM Courses

F. Rodriguez, Renzhe Yu, Jihyun Park, Mariela J. Rivas, M. Warschauer, Brian K. Sato
{"title":"Utilizing Learning Analytics to Map Students' Self-Reported Study Strategies to Click Behaviors in STEM Courses","authors":"F. Rodriguez, Renzhe Yu, Jihyun Park, Mariela J. Rivas, M. Warschauer, Brian K. Sato","doi":"10.1145/3303772.3303841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informed by cognitive theories of learning, this work examined how students' self-reported study patterns (spacing vs. cramming) corresponded to their engagement with the Learning Management System (LMS) across two years in a large biology course. We specifically focused on how students accessed non-mandatory resources (lecture videos, lecture slides) and considered whether this pattern differed by underrepresented minority (URM) status. Overall, students who self-reported utilizing spacing strategies throughout the course had higher grades than students who reported cramming throughout the course. When examining LMS engagement, only a small percentage of students accessed the lecture videos and lecture slides. Applying a negative binomial regression model to daily counts of click activities, we also found that students who utilized spacing strategies accessed LMS resources more often but not earlier before major deadlines. Moreover, this finding was not different for underrepresented students. Our results provide some initial evidence showing how spacing behaviors correspond to accessing learning resources. However, given the lack of general engagement with LMS resources, our results underscore the value of encouraging students to utilize these resources when studying course material.","PeriodicalId":382957,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Informed by cognitive theories of learning, this work examined how students' self-reported study patterns (spacing vs. cramming) corresponded to their engagement with the Learning Management System (LMS) across two years in a large biology course. We specifically focused on how students accessed non-mandatory resources (lecture videos, lecture slides) and considered whether this pattern differed by underrepresented minority (URM) status. Overall, students who self-reported utilizing spacing strategies throughout the course had higher grades than students who reported cramming throughout the course. When examining LMS engagement, only a small percentage of students accessed the lecture videos and lecture slides. Applying a negative binomial regression model to daily counts of click activities, we also found that students who utilized spacing strategies accessed LMS resources more often but not earlier before major deadlines. Moreover, this finding was not different for underrepresented students. Our results provide some initial evidence showing how spacing behaviors correspond to accessing learning resources. However, given the lack of general engagement with LMS resources, our results underscore the value of encouraging students to utilize these resources when studying course material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用学习分析绘制学生自报告学习策略在STEM课程中的点击行为
在认知学习理论的指导下,本研究调查了学生自我报告的学习模式(间隔与填塞)如何与他们在两年的大型生物学课程中对学习管理系统(LMS)的参与相对应。我们特别关注学生如何获取非强制性资源(讲座视频,讲座幻灯片),并考虑这种模式是否因未被充分代表的少数民族(URM)状况而异。总的来说,那些自我报告在整个课程中使用间隔策略的学生比那些在整个课程中填鸭式学习的学生成绩更高。在检查LMS参与度时,只有一小部分学生访问了讲座视频和讲座幻灯片。将负二项回归模型应用于每日点击活动计数,我们还发现使用间隔策略的学生更频繁地访问LMS资源,但不是在主要截止日期之前更早。此外,这一发现在代表性不足的学生中也没有什么不同。我们的研究结果提供了一些初步证据,表明间隔行为如何与获取学习资源相对应。然而,由于缺乏对LMS资源的普遍参与,我们的研究结果强调了鼓励学生在学习课程材料时利用这些资源的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DiAd: Domain Adaptation for Learning at Scale Top Concept Networks of Professional Education Reflections Exploring the Subtleties of Agency and Indirect Control in Digital Learning Games Exploring Learner Engagement Patterns in Teach-Outs Using Topic, Sentiment and On-topicness to Reflect on Pedagogy An Analysis of Student Representation, Representative Features and Classification Algorithms to Predict Degree Dropout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1