Comparisons of Eight Simplification Methods for Data Reduction of Terrain Point Cloud

Yuan Fang, L. Fan
{"title":"Comparisons of Eight Simplification Methods for Data Reduction of Terrain Point Cloud","authors":"Yuan Fang, L. Fan","doi":"10.1145/3484274.3484307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the applications of 3D point cloud data representing terrain surfaces have been growing rapidly. Such data typically have a very fine spatial resolution, which can lead to computational and visualisation issues. To overcome these issues, it is a common practice to reduce the density of point cloud data during initial data processing. As such, various simplification methods had been developed and used in practice. The choice of those methods is crucial to preserve features and shapes of the terrain in the simplified point cloud data. Previous studies on this matter were focused mainly on the methods commonly used in geosciences, but did not consider those in computer graphics. In this study, a total of eight simplification methods that are used widely in both geosciences and computer graphics were compared and analyzed using four sets of terrain surface point cloud data. In addition, unlike previous studies where a global RMSE (root mean squared error) was used as the metric for comparing different methods, the standard deviation of local RMSEs (root mean squared errors) was also calculated in this study to check the uniformity of local RMSEs over the whole terrain areas considered. The results show that the adaptive sampling method yielded thinned point cloud data of higher overall accuracy and more consistent local RMSEs than those obtained using the other methods considered.","PeriodicalId":143540,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Control and Computer Vision","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Control and Computer Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3484274.3484307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the applications of 3D point cloud data representing terrain surfaces have been growing rapidly. Such data typically have a very fine spatial resolution, which can lead to computational and visualisation issues. To overcome these issues, it is a common practice to reduce the density of point cloud data during initial data processing. As such, various simplification methods had been developed and used in practice. The choice of those methods is crucial to preserve features and shapes of the terrain in the simplified point cloud data. Previous studies on this matter were focused mainly on the methods commonly used in geosciences, but did not consider those in computer graphics. In this study, a total of eight simplification methods that are used widely in both geosciences and computer graphics were compared and analyzed using four sets of terrain surface point cloud data. In addition, unlike previous studies where a global RMSE (root mean squared error) was used as the metric for comparing different methods, the standard deviation of local RMSEs (root mean squared errors) was also calculated in this study to check the uniformity of local RMSEs over the whole terrain areas considered. The results show that the adaptive sampling method yielded thinned point cloud data of higher overall accuracy and more consistent local RMSEs than those obtained using the other methods considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地形点云数据约简的八种简化方法比较
近年来,三维点云数据表示地形表面的应用发展迅速。这些数据通常具有非常精细的空间分辨率,这可能导致计算和可视化问题。为了克服这些问题,通常的做法是在初始数据处理过程中降低点云数据的密度。因此,各种简化方法已经发展并在实践中使用。这些方法的选择对于在简化的点云数据中保持地形的特征和形状至关重要。以前对这一问题的研究主要集中在地球科学中常用的方法上,而没有考虑到计算机图形学中的方法。本研究利用4组地形表面点云数据,对地球科学和计算机图形学中广泛使用的8种简化方法进行了比较和分析。此外,与以往研究中使用全局RMSE(均方根误差)作为比较不同方法的度量不同,本研究还计算了局部RMSE(均方根误差)的标准差,以检查所考虑的整个地形区域的局部RMSE的均匀性。结果表明,自适应采样方法得到的点云数据整体精度更高,局部均方根误差更一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Object Detection Algorithm Combining FPN Structure With DETR DIB: Piled Man-made Object Detection and Pose Estimation in Point Cloud Blocks A Multi-Scale Self-Attention Network for Diabetic Retinopathy Retrieval Ensemble Multilayer Perceptron Model for Day-ahead Photovoltaic Forecasting Improvement of Detection Rate for Small Objects Using Pre-processing Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1