Piano concertos by F. Chopin: “composing center” means

P. Knysh
{"title":"Piano concertos by F. Chopin: “composing center” means","authors":"P. Knysh","doi":"10.34064/khnum1-57.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on characterizing compositional and structural peculiarities of piano concertos by F. Chopin. The research emphasis is laid on the revealed fact that the corresponding “composing center” means (V. Kholopova) function as fundamental issues in terms of creating their interpretational versions, thus, joining analytical procedures performers of the above pieces have to follow. With a view to objectivize data concerning the composing component of the Concertos e-moll and f-moll by F.Chopin, the article presents an actual comparative analysis of various perspectives as for the functional means, represented in the socalled note “schemes” of the both Concertos. It is highlighted that on the basis of the aesthetics and poetics of the style brilliant (J. N. Hummel, F. Kalkbrenner), in his Concertos F. Chopin demonstrates an individual innovative exceeding (M. Tomashevsky) of those existing standards of representing the concerto form, turning to the national character genre topicality, reconstructing that peculiar texture configuration type that makes the piano a musical instrument of a selfsufficient status. In accordance with the objective of the present research being to reveal the nature of the “composing center” means in Concertos by F. Chopin, first, the article concentrates on those life and creativity circumstances which served as determinants that had brought those musical pieces to life. It is highlighted that, on the one hand, his Concertos close the initial period of F. Chopin’s creative activities, where piano and orchestra music was dominant. On the other hand, for F. Chopin the early 1830s were the time of saying farewell to Poland, which was reflected in the deeply personal nature of the content of the both Concertos which appeared under the influence of the author’s feeling for K. Gladkovska and D. Pototska (it is the latter that the Concerto f-moll was dedicated to). It is found out that it is F. Kalkbrenner that the Concerto e-moll by F. Chopin is dedicated to, which, therefore, demonstrates his link to the epoch, to which Chopin was actually saying farewell, as well. In the present article, the subject-matter of the research is points of view of famous musicians and scholars-chopinists concerning the content and the form of the above-mentioned Concertos by Chopin. In this connection, the object of the work is our extrapolation of these data onto interpreting the composing center means as an ingredient of the corresponding performance analysis of the above pieces. Applying elements of general scientific (historic-genetic, deductive, comparative) and specific musicological (genre, style, texture, theme) gnoseological methods, we arrive at the conclusion that stylistically the composing means of the both Concertos by F. Chopin demonstrate a dual quality. On the one hand, they more than meet the requirements of the model of the modern at that time concerto virtuoso style of the epoch of transferring from Classicism to Romantism, and, on the other hand, they serve as the development of the traditions shaped up for the many-century existence of piano-concerto forms, starting with J. S. Bach, F. Couperin and W. A. Mozart with subsequently working their way to the future reconstruction of the concerto-piano style in the world practice of modern times. In terms of their composition structure the both Concertos are built according to the model of the three-part cycle of the classicist pattern with the corresponding inter-part tempo correlative ratio “fast – slow – fast”. However, F. Chopin’s content of this form is exclusively individual, integrating “a sole performance” and “deep poetic expressiveness”, “virtuosity” and “romanticism” (M. Tomashevskiy). It is emphasized that the existing points of view concerning the Concertos by F. Chopin are quite diverse in many respects. Some authors, in particular Yu. Kremlyov, point out to a certain composing style “immaturity” F. Chopin demonstrates there, admitting, at the same time, the fact of genius godsends being present in “details”. This author lays a special emphasis on the nationally peculiar sources of the music language of the Concertos, where Polish musical lexis prove to be dominant, which is especially typical of the genre final components (cracovienne). At present the above perspective concerning the both Concertos seems to be rather one-sided, which is in the focus of the monograph by M. Tomashevskiy). The Polish author regards the Concertos by F. Chopin as masterpieces of world concerto-piano literature, especially highlighting their slow parts Larghetto. It is there that Chopin’s piano expressive semantic and technique innovations are concentrated, being unique in terms of their self-sufficiency, though corresponding with orchestra accompaniment. It is no coincidence that the Concertos were the last piano-orchestra music pieces by F. Chopin, after which he composed only solo piano music. The means of the “composing center”, discovered in the Concertos, become fundamental for creating the texture-polyphonic complex based on a polygenre ontology and the technique of overlapping (S. Shkolyarenko), which implies modelling orchestra voices and colors on the piano, using solely the resources of this instrument. The both Concertos being dominant-piano oriented is also proved by the fact that F. Chopin himself considered it to be reasonable to perform them when accompanied by a string quartet, thus emphasizing the self-sufficiency of the piano constituent. Nevertheless, it did not mean any decrease of the significance of orchestra means that in the both Concertos are represented expertly, which proves wrong the quite popular idea as for F. Chopin’s not being proficient enough in the field of composing for orchestras. It is in the orchestra in the both Concertos that the theme development processes which set off the piano constituent according to the principle of double expositions as an attribute of a classical concert “contest” take place. The conducted analysis of the composition dramaturge peculiarities of the both Concertos is aimed at revealing their performance potential. It has been concluded that such qualities of the theme material of these masterpieces as their polygenre modality, polytexture, a peculiar correlative ratio of the background and the relief generate diverse versions of approaches to performing the corresponding textual content, which is determined by the dialectical correlation of the following two origins – the Chopin author’s and the interpretational performer’s ones. It has been emphasized that for performing pianists the expressive-content and the composition-technique versatility of the both Concertos by F. Chopin creates a way to individually reconstructing and reviving composition means complemented with various author’s and editors’ directions and comments. The latter form an integrative unity in terms of creating a cluster of “composing center” means, constituting still another component of the interpretational reflection and performers’ realization of the content and form of the piano Concertos by F. Chopin, building up the perspective of our further research as for the subject of the present article.","PeriodicalId":388829,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Interaction Between Arts, Pedagogy and the Theory and Practice of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34064/khnum1-57.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on characterizing compositional and structural peculiarities of piano concertos by F. Chopin. The research emphasis is laid on the revealed fact that the corresponding “composing center” means (V. Kholopova) function as fundamental issues in terms of creating their interpretational versions, thus, joining analytical procedures performers of the above pieces have to follow. With a view to objectivize data concerning the composing component of the Concertos e-moll and f-moll by F.Chopin, the article presents an actual comparative analysis of various perspectives as for the functional means, represented in the socalled note “schemes” of the both Concertos. It is highlighted that on the basis of the aesthetics and poetics of the style brilliant (J. N. Hummel, F. Kalkbrenner), in his Concertos F. Chopin demonstrates an individual innovative exceeding (M. Tomashevsky) of those existing standards of representing the concerto form, turning to the national character genre topicality, reconstructing that peculiar texture configuration type that makes the piano a musical instrument of a selfsufficient status. In accordance with the objective of the present research being to reveal the nature of the “composing center” means in Concertos by F. Chopin, first, the article concentrates on those life and creativity circumstances which served as determinants that had brought those musical pieces to life. It is highlighted that, on the one hand, his Concertos close the initial period of F. Chopin’s creative activities, where piano and orchestra music was dominant. On the other hand, for F. Chopin the early 1830s were the time of saying farewell to Poland, which was reflected in the deeply personal nature of the content of the both Concertos which appeared under the influence of the author’s feeling for K. Gladkovska and D. Pototska (it is the latter that the Concerto f-moll was dedicated to). It is found out that it is F. Kalkbrenner that the Concerto e-moll by F. Chopin is dedicated to, which, therefore, demonstrates his link to the epoch, to which Chopin was actually saying farewell, as well. In the present article, the subject-matter of the research is points of view of famous musicians and scholars-chopinists concerning the content and the form of the above-mentioned Concertos by Chopin. In this connection, the object of the work is our extrapolation of these data onto interpreting the composing center means as an ingredient of the corresponding performance analysis of the above pieces. Applying elements of general scientific (historic-genetic, deductive, comparative) and specific musicological (genre, style, texture, theme) gnoseological methods, we arrive at the conclusion that stylistically the composing means of the both Concertos by F. Chopin demonstrate a dual quality. On the one hand, they more than meet the requirements of the model of the modern at that time concerto virtuoso style of the epoch of transferring from Classicism to Romantism, and, on the other hand, they serve as the development of the traditions shaped up for the many-century existence of piano-concerto forms, starting with J. S. Bach, F. Couperin and W. A. Mozart with subsequently working their way to the future reconstruction of the concerto-piano style in the world practice of modern times. In terms of their composition structure the both Concertos are built according to the model of the three-part cycle of the classicist pattern with the corresponding inter-part tempo correlative ratio “fast – slow – fast”. However, F. Chopin’s content of this form is exclusively individual, integrating “a sole performance” and “deep poetic expressiveness”, “virtuosity” and “romanticism” (M. Tomashevskiy). It is emphasized that the existing points of view concerning the Concertos by F. Chopin are quite diverse in many respects. Some authors, in particular Yu. Kremlyov, point out to a certain composing style “immaturity” F. Chopin demonstrates there, admitting, at the same time, the fact of genius godsends being present in “details”. This author lays a special emphasis on the nationally peculiar sources of the music language of the Concertos, where Polish musical lexis prove to be dominant, which is especially typical of the genre final components (cracovienne). At present the above perspective concerning the both Concertos seems to be rather one-sided, which is in the focus of the monograph by M. Tomashevskiy). The Polish author regards the Concertos by F. Chopin as masterpieces of world concerto-piano literature, especially highlighting their slow parts Larghetto. It is there that Chopin’s piano expressive semantic and technique innovations are concentrated, being unique in terms of their self-sufficiency, though corresponding with orchestra accompaniment. It is no coincidence that the Concertos were the last piano-orchestra music pieces by F. Chopin, after which he composed only solo piano music. The means of the “composing center”, discovered in the Concertos, become fundamental for creating the texture-polyphonic complex based on a polygenre ontology and the technique of overlapping (S. Shkolyarenko), which implies modelling orchestra voices and colors on the piano, using solely the resources of this instrument. The both Concertos being dominant-piano oriented is also proved by the fact that F. Chopin himself considered it to be reasonable to perform them when accompanied by a string quartet, thus emphasizing the self-sufficiency of the piano constituent. Nevertheless, it did not mean any decrease of the significance of orchestra means that in the both Concertos are represented expertly, which proves wrong the quite popular idea as for F. Chopin’s not being proficient enough in the field of composing for orchestras. It is in the orchestra in the both Concertos that the theme development processes which set off the piano constituent according to the principle of double expositions as an attribute of a classical concert “contest” take place. The conducted analysis of the composition dramaturge peculiarities of the both Concertos is aimed at revealing their performance potential. It has been concluded that such qualities of the theme material of these masterpieces as their polygenre modality, polytexture, a peculiar correlative ratio of the background and the relief generate diverse versions of approaches to performing the corresponding textual content, which is determined by the dialectical correlation of the following two origins – the Chopin author’s and the interpretational performer’s ones. It has been emphasized that for performing pianists the expressive-content and the composition-technique versatility of the both Concertos by F. Chopin creates a way to individually reconstructing and reviving composition means complemented with various author’s and editors’ directions and comments. The latter form an integrative unity in terms of creating a cluster of “composing center” means, constituting still another component of the interpretational reflection and performers’ realization of the content and form of the piano Concertos by F. Chopin, building up the perspective of our further research as for the subject of the present article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肖邦钢琴协奏曲:“作曲中心”的意思是
本文着重分析肖邦钢琴协奏曲在作曲和结构上的特点。研究的重点是揭示了这样一个事实,即相应的“创作中心”手段(V. Kholopova)在创造其解释版本方面起着基本问题的作用,因此,上述作品的表演者必须遵循的分析程序。为了客观化肖邦《e-moll协奏曲》和《f-moll协奏曲》的作曲成分数据,本文从各个角度对这两部协奏曲的功能手段进行了实际的比较分析,这些功能手段体现在这两部协奏曲的所谓音符“方案”上。重点指出,肖邦在其协奏曲中,在风格辉煌(J. N. Hummel, F. Kalkbrenner)的美学和诗学基础上,对现有的协奏曲形式表现标准进行了个人创新超越(M. Tomashevsky),转向民族性体裁的话题性,重构了使钢琴成为一种自给自足的乐器的特殊织构类型。根据本研究的目的是揭示肖邦协奏曲中“创作中心”手段的本质,首先,文章集中在那些作为决定因素的生活和创造环境上,这些环境使这些音乐作品栩栩如生。值得强调的是,一方面,他的协奏曲结束了肖邦创作活动的最初阶段,在这个阶段,钢琴和管弦音乐占主导地位。另一方面,对肖邦来说,19世纪30年代早期是告别波兰的时期,这反映在这两部协奏曲的内容中,这两部协奏曲的内容是在作者对K.格拉德科夫斯卡和D.波托斯卡的感情的影响下出现的(《f-moll协奏曲》是献给后者的)。人们发现,肖邦的《e-moll协奏曲》是献给卡尔克布伦纳的,因此,这表明了他与肖邦实际上也在告别的时代的联系。在本文中,研究的主题是著名音乐家和学者对肖邦上述协奏曲的内容和形式的看法。在这方面,本作品的目的是我们将这些数据外推,以解释构成中心的手段,作为上述作品相应性能分析的组成部分。运用一般的科学(历史-遗传、演绎、比较)和特殊的音乐学(体裁、风格、织体、主题)的方法,我们得出结论,肖邦的两部协奏曲在风格上表现出双重性质。一方面,它们完全符合当时古典主义向浪漫主义过渡时代的现代协奏曲大师风格模式的要求,另一方面,它们是自巴赫开始的钢琴协奏曲形式存在了许多世纪以来形成的传统的发展。F. Couperin和W. A. Mozart,他们随后为重建协奏曲钢琴风格在现代世界的实践而努力。在作曲结构上,两部协奏曲都是按照古典主义曲式的三段式循环模式构建的,相应的部间节奏关联比为“快-慢-快”。然而,肖邦这种形式的内容完全是个人的,集“单一的表演”和“深刻的诗意表现力”、“精湛的技艺”和“浪漫主义”于一体(托马舍夫斯基)。本文强调,现有的关于肖邦协奏曲的观点在许多方面是相当多样化的。有些作家,尤其是于。克里姆里廖夫指出,肖邦在这里展示了某种作曲风格的“不成熟”,同时也承认,天才的天赐之物存在于“细节”之中。作者特别强调了协奏曲音乐语言的民族特色来源,其中波兰音乐词汇被证明是占主导地位的,这是特别典型的类型的最后组成部分(克拉科维恩)。目前,上述关于这两部协奏曲的观点似乎相当片面,这是托马舍夫斯基先生专著的重点)。这位波兰作家认为肖邦的协奏曲是世界钢琴协奏曲文学的杰作,尤其是其中的慢速部分。正是在这里,肖邦钢琴的表现语义和技术创新得以集中,虽然与管弦乐伴奏相对应,但却独具一格,自给自足。《协奏曲》是肖邦最后一部钢琴管弦乐曲,此后他只创作了钢琴独奏,这并非巧合。 “创作中心”的手段,发现的协奏曲,成为创建基本texture-polyphonic复杂的基于polygenre本体和重叠的技术(s . Shkolyarenko),这意味着造型乐团钢琴声音和颜色,仅仅使用这个工具的资源。这两首协奏曲都是以钢琴为主导的,肖邦本人也认为在弦乐四重奏的伴奏下演奏是合理的,从而强调了钢琴组成部分的自给自足。然而,这并不意味着管弦乐队的重要性有任何降低,这意味着在这两部协奏曲中都表现得很熟练,这证明了人们普遍认为肖邦在管弦乐队作曲方面不够精通的观点是错误的。正是在这两部协奏曲的管弦乐队中,主题发展的过程,使钢琴成分根据双重展示的原则,作为古典音乐会的一个属性“比赛”发生。对这两部协奏曲的创作、戏剧特点进行分析,旨在揭示它们的表演潜力。本文认为,这些名作的主题材料的多体裁情态、多织体、背景与凸出的特殊关联比例等特点,产生了相应文本内容表现方式的不同版本,这是由以下两个来源——肖邦作者的来源和演绎表演者的来源——的辩证关联所决定的。本文强调,对于演奏钢琴家来说,肖邦协奏曲的表现内容和作曲技巧的多样性创造了一种单独重建和复兴作曲手段的方式,并补充了各种作者和编辑的指导和评论。后者在创造“创作中心”手段的集群方面形成了一个整体的统一体,构成了肖邦钢琴协奏曲的内容和形式的阐释反思和演奏者实现的另一个组成部分,为本文的主题构建了我们进一步研究的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The image of male / female artist in Ukrainian literature at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries in the gender aspect Etienne Ozi – «a great bassonist of incredible talent» Choral conducting as a way of realizing the creative potential of a student choirmaster Opera women’s characters in the context of paired images (on the example of G. Bizet’s opera “Сarmen”) Two worlds of choral dramaturgy of G. Meyerbeer’s “Robert le Diable”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1