R&D investments and corporate carbon emissions: The moderating roles of CEO risk-averse and BOD independence

Yoon Jin Kim
{"title":"R&D investments and corporate carbon emissions: The moderating roles of CEO risk-averse and BOD independence","authors":"Yoon Jin Kim","doi":"10.38115/asgba.2023.20.4.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Irreversible and global climate crisis stemmed from saturated carbon dioxide is worsening. Fortunately, enterprises can reduce the CO₂by product and process innovation. Prior studies asserted that several firms utilize environmental innovation strategy to obtain both the carbon and financial performances. R&D investments are heavily linked to the environmental innovation, which is also emphasized by IPCC. This study conducted an empirical analysis aiming to find the influence of corporate R&D investments on carbon emissions, and the moderating effect of CEO risk-averse and BOD independence on the linkage between the two. A total of 211 non-financial American firms during the period from 2012 to 2021 were utilized. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, corporate R&D investments successfully reduced carbon emissions through environmental innovation. Second, the negative relation between R&D investments and carbon emissions was strengthened if the CEO risk-averse, measured by the CEO debt-equity ratio, lowers and the BOD independence, measured by the non-executive director ratio, rises. Third, conducting separate empirical analysis during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, the weakening effect of CEO risk-averse on the relationship between R&D investments and carbon emissions was amplified. The findings of this study supplemented additional evidence insisting on the importance of R&D investments for carbon reduction. Furthermore, the study illuminated the governance mix of CEO compensation and BOD independence for the strengthened relation between R&D investments and carbon reduction. It can be expected that BOD may complement the irrational decision-making of the CEO.","PeriodicalId":393783,"journal":{"name":"The Academic Society of Global Business Administration","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Academic Society of Global Business Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38115/asgba.2023.20.4.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Irreversible and global climate crisis stemmed from saturated carbon dioxide is worsening. Fortunately, enterprises can reduce the CO₂by product and process innovation. Prior studies asserted that several firms utilize environmental innovation strategy to obtain both the carbon and financial performances. R&D investments are heavily linked to the environmental innovation, which is also emphasized by IPCC. This study conducted an empirical analysis aiming to find the influence of corporate R&D investments on carbon emissions, and the moderating effect of CEO risk-averse and BOD independence on the linkage between the two. A total of 211 non-financial American firms during the period from 2012 to 2021 were utilized. The results of the analysis are as follows. First, corporate R&D investments successfully reduced carbon emissions through environmental innovation. Second, the negative relation between R&D investments and carbon emissions was strengthened if the CEO risk-averse, measured by the CEO debt-equity ratio, lowers and the BOD independence, measured by the non-executive director ratio, rises. Third, conducting separate empirical analysis during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, the weakening effect of CEO risk-averse on the relationship between R&D investments and carbon emissions was amplified. The findings of this study supplemented additional evidence insisting on the importance of R&D investments for carbon reduction. Furthermore, the study illuminated the governance mix of CEO compensation and BOD independence for the strengthened relation between R&D investments and carbon reduction. It can be expected that BOD may complement the irrational decision-making of the CEO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发投资与企业碳排放:CEO风险厌恶和董事会独立性的调节作用
由饱和二氧化碳引起的不可逆转的全球气候危机正在恶化。幸运的是,企业可以通过产品和工艺创新来减少二氧化碳的排放。先前的研究认为,一些企业利用环境创新战略来获得碳和财务绩效。研发投资与环境创新密切相关,IPCC也强调了这一点。本文通过实证分析,探讨了企业研发投入对碳排放的影响,以及CEO风险厌恶和董事会独立性对二者关联性的调节作用。在2012年至2021年期间,共有211家美国非金融公司被利用。分析结果如下:首先,企业研发投资通过环境创新成功地减少了碳排放。其次,当CEO的风险厌恶程度(以债务-权益比率衡量)降低、董事会独立性(以非执行董事比率衡量)上升时,研发投资与碳排放之间的负相关关系会增强。第三,通过对新冠肺炎疫情期间CEO风险厌恶对研发投资与碳排放关系的弱化效应进行单独实证分析,进一步放大CEO风险厌恶对研发投资与碳排放关系的弱化效应。这项研究的发现补充了坚持研发投资对碳减排重要性的额外证据。此外,研究还揭示了CEO薪酬和董事会独立性的治理组合对研发投资与碳减排关系的强化作用。可以预见,董事会可能会对CEO的非理性决策起到补充作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the High Commitment HRM System on Employees' Innovation Behavior: The Mediating Role of Acceptance of Organizational Change and the Moderating Role of HRM System Strength Managerial Ability and Peer Selection in Relative Performance Evaluation A Study of Developing a Job Recommendation Model Using Transformer Models A Study on Innovation Resistance and Acceptance Intention of Financial Metaverse Platform The Structural Relationship among Market Orientation, Information Sharing, New Product Development Flexibility, Product Modularization, and Development Performance of Chinese Fast Fashion Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1