Efficient approach to detect logical equivalence in the paradigm of software plagiarism

Rupayan Dutta
{"title":"Efficient approach to detect logical equivalence in the paradigm of software plagiarism","authors":"Rupayan Dutta","doi":"10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software plagiarism is one of the major obstacles which complicates the development and deployment of software systems. Legal complications related to use of copyright protected code has a far reaching effect. The challenge is to detect the existence of logical equivalence in an otherwise seemingly unmatched code. In this paper, a novel approach has been described which detects plagiarism only in logical statements of the code i.e. it does not detect copy-pasting in inclusion statements (e.g. #include in C/C++, import in JAVA), macro definitions (e.g. #define in C/C++), declaration statements and inside commented code. It also takes into account possible cosmetic changes of the code e.g. variable renaming, data type alterations, code snippets insertions or minor modifications. The method does comparison in an efficient minimalistic way, thus making it scalable to large code bases.","PeriodicalId":402311,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Software plagiarism is one of the major obstacles which complicates the development and deployment of software systems. Legal complications related to use of copyright protected code has a far reaching effect. The challenge is to detect the existence of logical equivalence in an otherwise seemingly unmatched code. In this paper, a novel approach has been described which detects plagiarism only in logical statements of the code i.e. it does not detect copy-pasting in inclusion statements (e.g. #include in C/C++, import in JAVA), macro definitions (e.g. #define in C/C++), declaration statements and inside commented code. It also takes into account possible cosmetic changes of the code e.g. variable renaming, data type alterations, code snippets insertions or minor modifications. The method does comparison in an efficient minimalistic way, thus making it scalable to large code bases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件剽窃范式中逻辑等价的有效检测方法
软件剽窃是软件系统开发和部署复杂化的主要障碍之一。与使用受版权保护的代码有关的法律问题具有深远的影响。挑战在于在看似不匹配的代码中检测逻辑等价的存在。在本文中,描述了一种新的方法,它只检测代码的逻辑语句中的抄袭,即它不检测包含语句(例如C/ c++中的#include, JAVA中的import),宏定义(例如C/ c++中的#define),声明语句和内部注释代码中的复制粘贴。它还考虑到代码可能的外观变化,例如变量重命名,数据类型更改,代码片段插入或小修改。该方法以一种高效、简约的方式进行比较,从而使其可扩展到大型代码库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of GaN buffer layer thickness on structural and optical properties of AlGaN/GaN based high electron mobility transistor structure grown on Si(111) substrate by plasma assisted molecular beam epitaxy technique Neural network based gene regulatory network reconstruction Facial landmark detection using FAST Corner Detector of UGC-DDMC Face Database of Tripura tribes A method for developing node probability table using qualitative value of software metrics Computational complexity analysis of PTS technique under graphics processing unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1