Analysis of Distribution Characteristics of Cloud-to-ground Lightning at Different Spatiotemporal Scales

S. Gu, Fengquan Li, Pei Wang, Jian Li, Zhe Li, Hantao Tao
{"title":"Analysis of Distribution Characteristics of Cloud-to-ground Lightning at Different Spatiotemporal Scales","authors":"S. Gu, Fengquan Li, Pei Wang, Jian Li, Zhe Li, Hantao Tao","doi":"10.1109/APL57308.2023.10182034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lightning strikes are the primary cause of transmission network failures. Strengthening the monitoring and research of lightning activities contributes to the scientific protection against lightning strikes in power grids. Therefore, based on the lightning detection results of the State Grid of China from 2012 to 2021, this article analyzes the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of lightning at different scales, and proposes a thunderstorm intensity parameter to measure the intensity of lightning activity. The results indicate that the number of total return stroke in the State Grid region from 2012 to 2021 was approximately 166 million, 2.1 times the number of first return stroke. The monthly variation showed a unimodal distribution, with June to August being the peak period of lightning activity. The spatial distribution of lightning activities was uneven, showing a distribution trend of more in east, central, and north China, while less in northwest and northeast China. The positive-polarity ratio of the first return stroke in various regions was greater than that of total return stroke, with east and central China being the most obvious. The median current in north China and east China was relatively small, and the median current of the first and all return stroke was comparable. The median current in central China, northeast China, and northwest China was relatively large, and the median current of the first return stroke was slightly greater than the median current of all return strokes. The results show that 30 min and $0.3^{\\circ}\\times 0.3^{\\circ}$ can be initially selected as the statistical time $\\Delta {\\mathrm{t}}$ and grid area for dense thunderstorms to measure the time intensity of lightning activity. The trend of changes in the number of lightning strikes was basically consistent with the number of dense thunderstorms.","PeriodicalId":371726,"journal":{"name":"2023 12th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning (APL)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 12th Asia-Pacific International Conference on Lightning (APL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APL57308.2023.10182034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lightning strikes are the primary cause of transmission network failures. Strengthening the monitoring and research of lightning activities contributes to the scientific protection against lightning strikes in power grids. Therefore, based on the lightning detection results of the State Grid of China from 2012 to 2021, this article analyzes the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of lightning at different scales, and proposes a thunderstorm intensity parameter to measure the intensity of lightning activity. The results indicate that the number of total return stroke in the State Grid region from 2012 to 2021 was approximately 166 million, 2.1 times the number of first return stroke. The monthly variation showed a unimodal distribution, with June to August being the peak period of lightning activity. The spatial distribution of lightning activities was uneven, showing a distribution trend of more in east, central, and north China, while less in northwest and northeast China. The positive-polarity ratio of the first return stroke in various regions was greater than that of total return stroke, with east and central China being the most obvious. The median current in north China and east China was relatively small, and the median current of the first and all return stroke was comparable. The median current in central China, northeast China, and northwest China was relatively large, and the median current of the first return stroke was slightly greater than the median current of all return strokes. The results show that 30 min and $0.3^{\circ}\times 0.3^{\circ}$ can be initially selected as the statistical time $\Delta {\mathrm{t}}$ and grid area for dense thunderstorms to measure the time intensity of lightning activity. The trend of changes in the number of lightning strikes was basically consistent with the number of dense thunderstorms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同时空尺度云地闪电分布特征分析
雷击是输电网络故障的主要原因。加强对雷电活动的监测与研究,有助于电网防雷的科学防护。因此,本文基于2012 - 2021年中国国家电网雷电探测结果,分析了不同尺度下雷电的时空分布特征,提出了测量雷电活动强度的雷暴强度参数。结果表明,2012 - 2021年国网区域总回航次数约为1.66亿次,是首次回航次数的2.1倍。月变化呈单峰型分布,6 ~ 8月为闪电活动高峰期。闪电活动的空间分布不均匀,呈东部、中部和华北偏多,西北和东北偏少的分布趋势。各区域首次回击的正极性比大于总回击的正极性比,以华东和华中地区最为明显。华北和华东的中位流相对较小,第一次回程和所有回程的中位流具有可比性。中部、东北、西北地区的中位数电流较大,首回程的中位数电流略大于所有回程的中位数电流。结果表明,可以初步选择30 min和$0.3^{\circ}\乘以$0.3^{\circ} $作为密集雷暴的统计时间$\Delta {\ mathm {t}}$和网格面积来测量闪电活动的时间强度。雷击次数变化趋势与密集雷暴次数变化趋势基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of cost-effective lightning protection measures for underprivileged communities Preliminary Results of Corona Discharge Current Measurements in the Early Formation of Lightning on Tower Performance of Bentonite and Peat Moss Mixtures as Grounding Enhancement Materials Thunderstorm Prediction Model Using SMOTE Sampling and Machine Learning Approach A Year of Global Lightning Deaths and Injuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1