Assessment and comparison of periodontal status and its impact on oral health-related quality of life among urban and rural adults of Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study

Sasmita Dalai, P. Tangade, Vikas Singh, Ankita Jain, Surbhi Priyadarshi, Jagriti Yadav
{"title":"Assessment and comparison of periodontal status and its impact on oral health-related quality of life among urban and rural adults of Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Sasmita Dalai, P. Tangade, Vikas Singh, Ankita Jain, Surbhi Priyadarshi, Jagriti Yadav","doi":"10.4103/jpcdoh.jpcdoh_11_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Periodontal diseases negatively influence people's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and despite advancements; still disparity exists among urban and rural dwellers. OHRQoL helps in a better understanding of subjective perception ensuring a better treatment plan that fits the patient's needs and concerns. Aims and Objectives: (1) To record the periodontal status of urban and rural populations of Moradabad using WHO pro forma 2013. (2) To assess and compare the OHRQoL using the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14). Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the rural (350) and urban (350) population of Moradabad aged 35–44 years, chosen from the outpatient department of Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Hospital. The WHO oral health assessment form for adults (2013) was used to assess the periodontal status and OHIP-14 was used for assessing OHRQoL. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS version 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square, Student's t-test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were employed for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of loss of attachment (LOA) (93.20%), presence of pocket (76.0%), and bleeding on probing (BOP) (74.0%) was significantly higher among the rural population. The mean OHIP scores were significantly higher for the rural population as compared to urban counterparts. Among the study population, OHIP 14 was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with age, gender, socioeconomic status, location, and periodontal parameters (LOA, Pocket, and BOP). Conclusions: The study shows that there is a significant association between periodontal status and OHRQoL. Rural individuals had a greater impact on OHRQoL than their urban counterpart. Strategies should be planned and implemented to minimize the disparity.","PeriodicalId":365865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care Dentistry and Oral Health","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care Dentistry and Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcdoh.jpcdoh_11_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Periodontal diseases negatively influence people's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and despite advancements; still disparity exists among urban and rural dwellers. OHRQoL helps in a better understanding of subjective perception ensuring a better treatment plan that fits the patient's needs and concerns. Aims and Objectives: (1) To record the periodontal status of urban and rural populations of Moradabad using WHO pro forma 2013. (2) To assess and compare the OHRQoL using the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14). Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among the rural (350) and urban (350) population of Moradabad aged 35–44 years, chosen from the outpatient department of Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Hospital. The WHO oral health assessment form for adults (2013) was used to assess the periodontal status and OHIP-14 was used for assessing OHRQoL. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS version 19.0 was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square, Student's t-test, and multiple logistic regression analysis were employed for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of loss of attachment (LOA) (93.20%), presence of pocket (76.0%), and bleeding on probing (BOP) (74.0%) was significantly higher among the rural population. The mean OHIP scores were significantly higher for the rural population as compared to urban counterparts. Among the study population, OHIP 14 was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) associated with age, gender, socioeconomic status, location, and periodontal parameters (LOA, Pocket, and BOP). Conclusions: The study shows that there is a significant association between periodontal status and OHRQoL. Rural individuals had a greater impact on OHRQoL than their urban counterpart. Strategies should be planned and implemented to minimize the disparity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和比较北方邦城市和农村成年人牙周状况及其对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究
背景:牙周病对人们口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)产生负面影响,尽管取得了进展;城乡居民之间仍然存在差距。OHRQoL有助于更好地理解主观感知,确保更好的治疗计划符合患者的需求和关注。目的和目标:(1)使用世卫组织2013年预表记录莫拉达巴德城市和农村人口的牙周状况。(2)采用口腔健康影响量表-14 (OHIP-14)对OHRQoL进行评估和比较。研究对象和方法:对莫拉达巴德35-44岁的农村(350人)和城市(350人)人口进行了横断面研究,这些人口来自Teerthanker Mahaveer牙科学院和医院的门诊部。使用WHO成人口腔健康评估表(2013)评估牙周状况,使用OHIP-14评估OHRQoL。统计分析方法:采用SPSS 19.0版本进行统计分析。统计学分析采用卡方检验、学生t检验和多元logistic回归分析。结果:农村人群中附着丧失(LOA)(93.20%)、囊袋存在(76.0%)和探诊出血(BOP)(74.0%)的发生率明显高于农村人群。与城市人口相比,农村人口的OHIP平均得分明显更高。在研究人群中,OHIP 14与年龄、性别、社会经济地位、地理位置和牙周参数(LOA、Pocket和BOP)显著相关(P≤0.05)。结论:研究表明牙周状况与OHRQoL之间存在显著相关性。农村个体对OHRQoL的影响大于城市个体。应规划和执行各种战略,尽量减少这种差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Achondroplasia and its oral manifestations Evaluation of awareness, knowledge, and approval of orthodontic treatment among dental patients in Northwestern Nigeria: A cross-sectional study Tongue abnormalities in children: Case series and review of literature Comparative evaluation of novel herbal mouthwash with 12.5% xylitol mouthwash and 0.7 M saline mouthwash on plaque control: An interventional study An upstream approach model for curtailing unhealthy diet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1