Assessment of Undernutrition Among the Under-5 Children in a Slum of Kolkata: A Comparison Between z Scores and the Conventional System

S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Das, Somnath Mondal
{"title":"Assessment of Undernutrition Among the Under-5 Children in a Slum of Kolkata: A Comparison Between z Scores and the Conventional System","authors":"S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Das, Somnath Mondal","doi":"10.1177/1941406413513154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. This cross-sectional study was done to assess undernutrition among children under the age of 5 years in a slum of Kolkata (n = 188) and to compare these results with z score and the conventional Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) system. Methods. Data were collected by interviewing the mothers of the children, conducting anthropometric measurements, and using World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 16. The chi-square test was used, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results. Overall, around 60% children were undernourished (z score < −2 SD). The conventional growth monitoring detected only underweight children, but when the z score system of WHO Child Growth Standards was used, those children were further classified as wasting and stunting. As per the IAP criteria, 104 children were undernourished and 7 were severely undernourished, but by z score, 98 children were undernourished and 29 were severely undernourished. Conclusion....","PeriodicalId":398639,"journal":{"name":"ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1941406413513154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background. This cross-sectional study was done to assess undernutrition among children under the age of 5 years in a slum of Kolkata (n = 188) and to compare these results with z score and the conventional Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) system. Methods. Data were collected by interviewing the mothers of the children, conducting anthropometric measurements, and using World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 16. The chi-square test was used, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results. Overall, around 60% children were undernourished (z score < −2 SD). The conventional growth monitoring detected only underweight children, but when the z score system of WHO Child Growth Standards was used, those children were further classified as wasting and stunting. As per the IAP criteria, 104 children were undernourished and 7 were severely undernourished, but by z score, 98 children were undernourished and 29 were severely undernourished. Conclusion....
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加尔各答贫民窟5岁以下儿童营养不良的评估:z分数与传统系统的比较
背景。本横断面研究旨在评估加尔各答贫民窟5岁以下儿童的营养不良状况(n = 188),并将这些结果与z评分和传统的印度儿科学会(IAP)系统进行比较。方法。通过访谈儿童的母亲、进行人体测量和使用世界卫生组织(WHO)生长图表收集数据。采用SPSS 16进行统计分析。采用卡方检验,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果。总体而言,约60%的儿童营养不良(z评分< - 2 SD)。传统的生长监测只检测到体重不足的儿童,但当使用世界卫生组织儿童生长标准的z评分系统时,这些儿童进一步被分类为消瘦和发育迟缓。按照IAP标准,104名儿童营养不良,7名儿童严重营养不良,但按照z评分,98名儿童营养不良,29名儿童严重营养不良。结论……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scurvy Related to the Use of a Homemade Tube Feeding Formula Vitamin D Prevalence of Deficiency on an Inpatient Pediatric Psychiatry Service Improving Clinical Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants by Early Standardized Nutritional Management Use of Expressed Breast Milk With the Ketogenic Diet Tackling Pediatric Obesity All Hands on Deck
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1