The usefulness of the sources of formal and informal support in the context of the needs of families with children with disabilities

Ondrej Botek, N. Kovalčíková
{"title":"The usefulness of the sources of formal and informal support in the context of the needs of families with children with disabilities","authors":"Ondrej Botek, N. Kovalčíková","doi":"10.29376/parbeszed.2023.10/1/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A child’s disability changes the family and has an impact on the quality of life of all its members. Consequently, the family’s needs change as well, especially when it comes to their need for support. \nGoal: The goal of this study was to map how families with children with disabilities perceive the usefulness of the sources of formal and informal support in the context of family needs, as very important feedback for social work and social policy as major actors in formal support. \nMethods: The study was conducted using a quantitative research strategy. The relevant data was acquired using two standardized questionnaires – The Family Support Scale (FSS) by authors Dunst, Jenkins and Trivette (1984) and The Family Needs Survey by authors Bailey and Simeonsson (1988). The sample of respondents was comprised of 493 parents of children with disabilities, out of which there was a much larger number of women – mothers (N= 427) than men – fathers (N= 66). \nResults: The results of the study suggest that for families with children with disabilities, the most dominant need is the support from their relatives, while they also feel an increased need for finances. In terms of the perception of the usefulness of sources, informal support was more dominant, and the support of a husband / wife / partner and close relatives was determined the most useful. The study proved the existence of various statistically significant links, such as the link between informal support in the form of parent groups, financial needs, and the need for support from the community. \nConclusion: The study proved an important fact – that whichever kind of formal, but mainly informal support has a direct influence on the extent of the satisfaction of needs. The presence and usefulness of sources of support positively impacts the satisfaction of family needs.","PeriodicalId":447302,"journal":{"name":"Párbeszéd: Szociális munka folyóirat","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Párbeszéd: Szociális munka folyóirat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29376/parbeszed.2023.10/1/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A child’s disability changes the family and has an impact on the quality of life of all its members. Consequently, the family’s needs change as well, especially when it comes to their need for support. Goal: The goal of this study was to map how families with children with disabilities perceive the usefulness of the sources of formal and informal support in the context of family needs, as very important feedback for social work and social policy as major actors in formal support. Methods: The study was conducted using a quantitative research strategy. The relevant data was acquired using two standardized questionnaires – The Family Support Scale (FSS) by authors Dunst, Jenkins and Trivette (1984) and The Family Needs Survey by authors Bailey and Simeonsson (1988). The sample of respondents was comprised of 493 parents of children with disabilities, out of which there was a much larger number of women – mothers (N= 427) than men – fathers (N= 66). Results: The results of the study suggest that for families with children with disabilities, the most dominant need is the support from their relatives, while they also feel an increased need for finances. In terms of the perception of the usefulness of sources, informal support was more dominant, and the support of a husband / wife / partner and close relatives was determined the most useful. The study proved the existence of various statistically significant links, such as the link between informal support in the form of parent groups, financial needs, and the need for support from the community. Conclusion: The study proved an important fact – that whichever kind of formal, but mainly informal support has a direct influence on the extent of the satisfaction of needs. The presence and usefulness of sources of support positively impacts the satisfaction of family needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有残疾儿童的家庭的需要方面,正式和非正式支助来源的有用性
背景:儿童的残疾改变了家庭,并对家庭所有成员的生活质量产生影响。因此,家庭的需求也发生了变化,特别是在他们需要支持的时候。目标:本研究的目的是绘制有残疾儿童的家庭如何看待家庭需求背景下正式和非正式支持来源的有用性,作为社会工作和社会政策的重要反馈,作为正式支持的主要参与者。方法:本研究采用定量研究策略。相关数据是通过两份标准化问卷获得的——Dunst, Jenkins和Trivette(1984)的家庭支持量表(FSS)和Bailey和Simeonsson(1988)的家庭需求调查。调查对象包括493名残疾儿童的父母,其中女性母亲(N= 427)比男性父亲(N= 66)多得多。结果:研究结果显示,对于有残疾儿童的家庭来说,最主要的需求是来自亲戚的支持,同时他们对经济的需求也在增加。在对来源有用性的看法方面,非正式的支持占主导地位,而丈夫/妻子/伴侣和近亲的支持被认为是最有用的。这项研究证明存在各种统计上显著的联系,例如父母团体形式的非正式支持、财政需要和社区支持需要之间的联系。结论:研究证明了一个重要的事实——无论哪种形式的正式支持,但主要是非正式支持,都对需求的满足程度有直接的影响。支持来源的存在和有用性对家庭需求的满足有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A hajléktalanság női arca Beszámoló az International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) prágai küldöttgyűléséről és konferenciájáról Mondd, hogy vagy így? (Like a Rolling Stone) A civilizáció egészét érintő változások és a szociális munka - Rendhagyó recenzió Recenzió - Béres-Deák Rita: Queer Families in Hungary. Same-Sex Couples, Families of Origin, and Kinship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1