The Panic of 1857, Nationalism, and Secession (A)

R. Bruner
{"title":"The Panic of 1857, Nationalism, and Secession (A)","authors":"R. Bruner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3050048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case considers the association between a financial crisis and regime change. The setting for this case is 1861, when Virginians debate the question of secession from the United States, and when northwestern Virginians contemplated secession from Virginia. The proximate financial crisis was the Panic of 1857.<br> <br>Excerpt<br><br>UVA-F-1802<br><br>Rev. Nov. 6, 2019<br><br>The Panic of 1857, Nationalism, and Secession (A)<br> <br>On April 17, 1861, a convention chartered by the Virginia state legislature voted to approve an Ordinance of Secession by a vote of 88 to 55. The ordinance would be submitted to a referendum of voters for ratification on May 23. It was adopted following stormy debates. In the five months before, seven Southern states had seceded from the Union. For a chronology of events, see Exhibit1. Exhibit2 gives a map of seceding states.<br> <br>On April 22, 1861, two delegates to the convention, John S. Carlile and Waitman T.Willey (see Exhibits3 and4), distributed a call for a convention of citizens in northwestern Virginia (see Exhibit5). Carlile had argued that the decision to secede was illegal. Willey asserted that the Virginia Convention had not represented the full diversity of views in the Commonwealth, particularly of yeoman farmers in northwestern Virginia. How would Carlile and Willey carry their appeals to the citizens of their region? <br><br>The events leading up to the wave of secession decisions were complicated and spread over decades. Yet the impulse toward secession accelerated in 1857, when a Supreme Court decision and civil unrest polarized the nation both related to slavery. And the year also marked the panic of 1857 and economic turmoil that some observers also said influenced the path to secession. <br><br>. . .<br>","PeriodicalId":390041,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case Collection","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case Collection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3050048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case considers the association between a financial crisis and regime change. The setting for this case is 1861, when Virginians debate the question of secession from the United States, and when northwestern Virginians contemplated secession from Virginia. The proximate financial crisis was the Panic of 1857.

Excerpt

UVA-F-1802

Rev. Nov. 6, 2019

The Panic of 1857, Nationalism, and Secession (A)

On April 17, 1861, a convention chartered by the Virginia state legislature voted to approve an Ordinance of Secession by a vote of 88 to 55. The ordinance would be submitted to a referendum of voters for ratification on May 23. It was adopted following stormy debates. In the five months before, seven Southern states had seceded from the Union. For a chronology of events, see Exhibit1. Exhibit2 gives a map of seceding states.

On April 22, 1861, two delegates to the convention, John S. Carlile and Waitman T.Willey (see Exhibits3 and4), distributed a call for a convention of citizens in northwestern Virginia (see Exhibit5). Carlile had argued that the decision to secede was illegal. Willey asserted that the Virginia Convention had not represented the full diversity of views in the Commonwealth, particularly of yeoman farmers in northwestern Virginia. How would Carlile and Willey carry their appeals to the citizens of their region?

The events leading up to the wave of secession decisions were complicated and spread over decades. Yet the impulse toward secession accelerated in 1857, when a Supreme Court decision and civil unrest polarized the nation both related to slavery. And the year also marked the panic of 1857 and economic turmoil that some observers also said influenced the path to secession.

. . .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1857年的恐慌,民族主义和分裂(A)
这个案例考虑了金融危机和政权更迭之间的联系。这个案件的背景是1861年,当时弗吉尼亚人正在讨论脱离美国的问题,而弗吉尼亚西北部的人也在考虑脱离弗吉尼亚。最近的金融危机是1857年的大恐慌。excerptuva牧师——f - 1802。1857年的恐慌、民族主义和分裂(A) 1861年4月17日,弗吉尼亚州立法机构召开会议,以88票对55票通过了《分裂条例》。该条例将于5月23日提交给选民进行全民公投,以获得批准。它在激烈的辩论后获得通过。在此之前的五个月里,七个南方州已经脱离联邦。有关事件的年表,请参见附录1。展品2给出了退出州的地图。1861年4月22日,会议的两位代表,约翰·s·卡莱尔和怀特曼·t·威利(见展品3和4),分发了一份呼吁在弗吉尼亚西北部召开公民会议的宣言(见展品5)。卡莱尔认为,脱离联邦的决定是非法的。威利断言,维吉尼亚会议没有充分代表联邦内部的各种观点,尤其是维吉尼亚西北部的自曼农民。卡莱尔和威利将如何向他们所在地区的公民发出呼吁?导致这一波分裂决定的事件是复杂的,并且持续了几十年。然而,1857年,当最高法院的一项裁决和内乱都与奴隶制有关时,分裂的冲动加速了。这一年也标志着1857年的恐慌和经济动荡,一些观察家也说这影响了美国脱离联邦的道路. . . .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rohvi Re-contextualizing Opportunity as Artefact Signalling for Entrepreneurial Action Uncertainty, Timing and Luck on Quantum terms in Entrepreneurship A Brief Note on Hoshin Kanri: Strategy Deployment Optimizing Academic Articles: A Practical Guide for Managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1