The Effect of Relative Performance Information on Knowledge Sharing among Employees

Christian Schnieder, Friedrich Sommer, Arnt Wöhrmann
{"title":"The Effect of Relative Performance Information on Knowledge Sharing among Employees","authors":"Christian Schnieder, Friedrich Sommer, Arnt Wöhrmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3275320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the effect of relative performance information (RPI) on knowledge sharing among employees. Additionally, we investigate whether the effect of RPI on knowledge sharing differs when employees can observe each other’s knowledge-sharing decisions. Based on the concepts of social comparison, impression management, social norms, and reciprocity, we predict and find that the presence of RPI reduces knowledge sharing among employees and that the observability of individual knowledge-sharing decisions increases knowledge sharing. Concerning the interaction of RPI and observability, theory suggests that observability mitigates the negative effect of RPI on knowledge sharing. However, we find that observability reduces the negative effect of RPI on knowledge sharing only in the short term. Over time, observability leads to increased knowledge sharing when RPI is absent but not when RPI is present. Hence, mere observability cannot completely suspend the negative effect of RPI. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":357263,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3275320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examines the effect of relative performance information (RPI) on knowledge sharing among employees. Additionally, we investigate whether the effect of RPI on knowledge sharing differs when employees can observe each other’s knowledge-sharing decisions. Based on the concepts of social comparison, impression management, social norms, and reciprocity, we predict and find that the presence of RPI reduces knowledge sharing among employees and that the observability of individual knowledge-sharing decisions increases knowledge sharing. Concerning the interaction of RPI and observability, theory suggests that observability mitigates the negative effect of RPI on knowledge sharing. However, we find that observability reduces the negative effect of RPI on knowledge sharing only in the short term. Over time, observability leads to increased knowledge sharing when RPI is absent but not when RPI is present. Hence, mere observability cannot completely suspend the negative effect of RPI. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对绩效信息对员工知识共享的影响
本研究探讨相对绩效资讯(relative performance information, RPI)对员工知识分享的影响。此外,我们还考察了当员工能够观察到彼此的知识共享决策时,RPI对知识共享的影响是否不同。基于社会比较、印象管理、社会规范和互惠的概念,我们预测并发现RPI的存在减少了员工之间的知识共享,而个体知识共享决策的可观察性增加了知识共享。在RPI与可观察性的交互作用方面,理论认为可观察性可以缓解RPI对知识共享的负面影响。然而,我们发现可观察性仅在短期内降低了RPI对知识共享的负面影响。随着时间的推移,当RPI不存在时,可观察性会导致知识共享的增加,而当RPI存在时则不会。因此,单纯的可观测性并不能完全消除RPI的负面影响。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Truncated Balancing Policy for Perishable Inventory Management: Combating High Shortage Penalties Disclosure Paternalism Legal Expertise and the Role of Litigation Risk in Firms’ Conservatism Choices Is Consistency the Panacea? Inconsistent or Consistent Tax Transfer Prices with Strategic Taxpayer and Tax Authority Behavior Government Transparency and Firm-Level Operational Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1