Economic aspects of the fixed combinations of lipid lowering medicines in group risks patients

M. Zhuravleva, M. Frolov, E. A. Luchinin, K. Kokushkin, E. D. Laryushkina, T. Kameneva, E. V. Kuznetsova
{"title":"Economic aspects of the fixed combinations of lipid lowering medicines in group risks patients","authors":"M. Zhuravleva, M. Frolov, E. A. Luchinin, K. Kokushkin, E. D. Laryushkina, T. Kameneva, E. V. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.37489/2588-0519-2023-2-42-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance.  Cardio-vascular diseases (CVD) are the one of the main reasons of mortality and disability. Hypercholesterinemia is a factor of CVD progression, and thus it should be corrected. Combination of statin + ezetemib is an effective option of a medical technology for this purpose. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of rosuvastatin and ezetemib fixed combination (FC) has been performed in this work in comparison with free combination (FrC) of these drugs.Materials and methods. Modelling of FC vs FrC in groups of CVD risk has been performed on 1–5 years horizon based on the local epidemiologic published data with aim of economic analysis. Efficacy of FC and FrC, direct medical costs, including cost of drugs, hospitalizations etc. were taken into account also. ICER has been calculated and compared with willingness to pay.Results. FC usage instead FrC can prevent 2960–3055 deaths and 8880–9164 admissions to hospital caused CVD. FC decrease of ambulance cost as well as others direct medical expenditures in compare with FrC treatment on 9,3 bln RUR per 5 years. ICER has been calculated and has negative (dominant) result.Conclusion. FC usage is an economic dominant technology in compare with FrC for hypercholesterolemia control.","PeriodicalId":326764,"journal":{"name":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kachestvennaya Klinicheskaya Praktika = Good Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2023-2-42-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance.  Cardio-vascular diseases (CVD) are the one of the main reasons of mortality and disability. Hypercholesterinemia is a factor of CVD progression, and thus it should be corrected. Combination of statin + ezetemib is an effective option of a medical technology for this purpose. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of rosuvastatin and ezetemib fixed combination (FC) has been performed in this work in comparison with free combination (FrC) of these drugs.Materials and methods. Modelling of FC vs FrC in groups of CVD risk has been performed on 1–5 years horizon based on the local epidemiologic published data with aim of economic analysis. Efficacy of FC and FrC, direct medical costs, including cost of drugs, hospitalizations etc. were taken into account also. ICER has been calculated and compared with willingness to pay.Results. FC usage instead FrC can prevent 2960–3055 deaths and 8880–9164 admissions to hospital caused CVD. FC decrease of ambulance cost as well as others direct medical expenditures in compare with FrC treatment on 9,3 bln RUR per 5 years. ICER has been calculated and has negative (dominant) result.Conclusion. FC usage is an economic dominant technology in compare with FrC for hypercholesterolemia control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组危患者固定联合降脂药物的经济性分析
的相关性。心血管疾病(CVD)是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因之一。高胆固醇血症是心血管疾病进展的一个因素,因此应该加以纠正。他汀+依泽替米联合使用是一种有效的医疗技术。本研究对瑞舒伐他汀与依泽替米固定联合用药(FC)与自由联合用药(FrC)进行了药物经济学分析。材料和方法。基于当地已发表的流行病学数据,以经济分析为目的,对心血管疾病风险组中的FC和FrC进行了1-5年的建模。还考虑了FC和FrC的疗效、直接医疗费用,包括药费、住院费等。计算ICER并与支付意愿进行比较。使用FC代替FrC可以防止2960-3055人死亡,8880-9164人因心血管疾病入院。与FrC治疗相比,FC治疗减少了救护车费用和其他直接医疗费用,每5年减少93亿卢比。ICER计算结果为阴性(显性)。与氟化碳相比,氟化碳是控制高胆固醇血症的经济优势技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Possibility analysis of antiepileptic drugs import substitution in the Russian Federation Ineffectiveness of carbapenems in real-world clinical practice according to therapeutic drug monitoring data and Roszdravnadzor AIS reports Pharmacotherapy with alpha-1 adrenergic blockers and lipid spectrum correction in patients with urinary disorders Medical and biological research data Focus on lomefloxacin: effectiveness and safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1