Attitude to divorce by an Act of Parliament in eighteenth-century England

A. Tsareva
{"title":"Attitude to divorce by an Act of Parliament in eighteenth-century England","authors":"A. Tsareva","doi":"10.32608/2307-8383-2021-29-023-042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eighteenth-century England was different from other Protestant countries in its lack of popular access to divorce; most spouses settled for separation from bed and board, semi-legal procedures or simply desertion. Divorces by Acts of Parliament that opened the possibility for a remarriage were not in high demand. The article analyses the attitude of the English to divorce and uncovers the reasons for the unwillingness to use the procedure including spread of information about one’s private life, perceived danger to reputation and morality as well as the cost and duration of the proceedings.","PeriodicalId":348860,"journal":{"name":"Adam & Eve. Gender History Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adam & Eve. Gender History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32608/2307-8383-2021-29-023-042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The eighteenth-century England was different from other Protestant countries in its lack of popular access to divorce; most spouses settled for separation from bed and board, semi-legal procedures or simply desertion. Divorces by Acts of Parliament that opened the possibility for a remarriage were not in high demand. The article analyses the attitude of the English to divorce and uncovers the reasons for the unwillingness to use the procedure including spread of information about one’s private life, perceived danger to reputation and morality as well as the cost and duration of the proceedings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18世纪英国议会法案对离婚的态度
18世纪的英国不同于其他新教国家,它缺乏普遍的离婚途径;大多数夫妻都选择了不吃不住、半法律程序或干脆抛弃。议会法案规定的离婚为再婚提供了可能,但离婚的需求并不高。本文分析了英国人对离婚的态度,揭示了不愿使用离婚程序的原因,包括私生活信息的传播,名誉和道德的危险,以及诉讼的成本和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONFERENCE “PILGRIMAGE AND SENSES”, 7 JUNE 2019, OXFORD BATHILDIS: THE QUEEN’S TWO STORIES Temptations of the mind: a Russian Minerva in the “dark era” MARIANNE ERHMANN. MY INTRODUCTORY SPEECH Katharina von Bora: peculiarities of the protestant marriage at the early 16th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1