Twitter as a Polarized Space for Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Turkey

Sema Akboga, E. Arik
{"title":"Twitter as a Polarized Space for Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Turkey","authors":"Sema Akboga, E. Arik","doi":"10.12658/M0439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the coverage of CSOs on social media and the use of social media by CSOs has been gaining momentum. To contribute to this line of research, this study investigates the coverage of civil society organizations (CSO) on Twitter in Turkey by focusing on the most frequently mentioned organizations. It examines the characteristics of these CSOs as well as the effect that social and political developments in Turkey have on their coverage on Twitter. The data were collected from Twitter for the period between August 18, 2019 and September 17, 2019. We found that CSOs were not equally mentioned on Twitter; a total of 29,387 tweets mentioned 4,941 different CSOs, representing only 3.98% of all CSOs in Turkey. We also found that, with a few exceptions, tweets were not equally distributed in number across the CSOs or over time. Furthermore, the content of the tweets about the most frequently mentioned CSOs was strongly related to the political developments in Turkey, thereby reflecting the politically polarized views about the organizations in Turkey. Therefore, we concluded that ideological divisions in politically polarized countries such as Turkey shape the coverage of CSOs on Twitter.","PeriodicalId":102220,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanity and Society (insan & toplum)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/M0439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Research on the coverage of CSOs on social media and the use of social media by CSOs has been gaining momentum. To contribute to this line of research, this study investigates the coverage of civil society organizations (CSO) on Twitter in Turkey by focusing on the most frequently mentioned organizations. It examines the characteristics of these CSOs as well as the effect that social and political developments in Turkey have on their coverage on Twitter. The data were collected from Twitter for the period between August 18, 2019 and September 17, 2019. We found that CSOs were not equally mentioned on Twitter; a total of 29,387 tweets mentioned 4,941 different CSOs, representing only 3.98% of all CSOs in Turkey. We also found that, with a few exceptions, tweets were not equally distributed in number across the CSOs or over time. Furthermore, the content of the tweets about the most frequently mentioned CSOs was strongly related to the political developments in Turkey, thereby reflecting the politically polarized views about the organizations in Turkey. Therefore, we concluded that ideological divisions in politically polarized countries such as Turkey shape the coverage of CSOs on Twitter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推特是土耳其公民社会组织的两极分化空间
关于公民社会组织在社会化媒体上的覆盖和公民社会组织使用社会化媒体的研究越来越多。为了促进这一研究方向,本研究通过关注最常被提及的组织,调查了土耳其Twitter上公民社会组织(CSO)的报道。它考察了这些公民社会组织的特点,以及土耳其的社会和政治发展对他们在Twitter上的报道的影响。这些数据是在2019年8月18日至2019年9月17日期间从Twitter收集的。我们发现,在Twitter上,公民社会组织并没有被同等地提及;共有29387条推文提到了4941个不同的公民社会组织,仅占土耳其所有公民社会组织的3.98%。我们还发现,除了少数例外,推文的数量在cso之间或随着时间的推移并不是均匀分布的。此外,最常被提及的公民社会组织的推文内容与土耳其的政治发展密切相关,从而反映了对土耳其组织的政治两极分化观点。因此,我们得出结论,在土耳其等政治两极分化的国家,意识形态分歧影响了公民社会组织在Twitter上的报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
https://www.insanvetoplum.org/sayilar/11-4/m0637 Evaluating the Relationships among the Sociodemographic Variables and Gender Perceptions of Undergraduate Students in Turkey: A Meta-Analysis Study An Analysis of Interactions in Intercultural Marriages: A Field Study of Alanya Confessions of a Muslim Humanist Analysis and Criticism of the Comparative Historical Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1