Risk-Based Zoning Strategy for Soil Remediation at an Industrial Site

A. Al-Yousfi, P. Hannak, James F. Strunk, W. Davies, Sunil I. Shah
{"title":"Risk-Based Zoning Strategy for Soil Remediation at an Industrial Site","authors":"A. Al-Yousfi, P. Hannak, James F. Strunk, W. Davies, Sunil I. Shah","doi":"10.1080/10588330091134167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After determining at an early stage of the project that the future land use of this New Jersey chemical manufacturing site remain industrial in nature, the site was zoned according to risk. The chemicals of concern (COCs) at the site included relatively low levels of mono- and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated aliphatics, as well as other volatile and semivolatile compounds. Direct human exposure scenarios were the key to the mitigation of risks related to soils because the groundwater migration pathway was already interrupted using groundwater recovery. A focused remedial strategy was developed to ensure that the exposure pathways (inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact) are alleviated and the remedial measures are protective to the workers operating and/or maintaining the site. The risk evaluation process included a preliminary risk assessment (Tier 1) based on a comparison with pertinent soil cleanup criteria, a prioritization analysis to rank zones, chemicals and pathways of concern, and an application of the Risk Based Corrective Action (RBCA) approach (Tier 2) for construction worker exposure scenario. The risk assessment identified selected areas that would benefit from remedial actions. Prioritization Analysis classified the site into five high-priority (comprising 97% of the total health-based risk), three medium-priority (contributing to remaining 2 to 3% of the risk), and adequately protected areas. The boundaries and volumes of affected areas were delineated based on confirmatory soil sampling and statistical analyses. The remedial technologies selected for the site have achieved appropriate reduction in risk to comply with all State regulations and include (in addition to the institutional controls): • Capping the site where only immobilesemivolatile contaminants are present • Excavation and on-site treatment of the soils impacted by volatile organic com pounds through ex situ low temperature desorption, or alternative “biopile” treatment and natural attenuation, and • Excavation and off-site disposal of limited volumes of soils This risk-based, integral approach helped identify the real significance of contamination present at the site and facilitated the development of suitable and adequate remedies. Had not it been for this approach, the mere comparison with soil cleanup criteria would have unnecessarily resulted in denoting all areas as nuisance contributors, and thus requiring some actions. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has approved this approach and contributed to its accomplishment.","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"689 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330091134167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

After determining at an early stage of the project that the future land use of this New Jersey chemical manufacturing site remain industrial in nature, the site was zoned according to risk. The chemicals of concern (COCs) at the site included relatively low levels of mono- and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated aliphatics, as well as other volatile and semivolatile compounds. Direct human exposure scenarios were the key to the mitigation of risks related to soils because the groundwater migration pathway was already interrupted using groundwater recovery. A focused remedial strategy was developed to ensure that the exposure pathways (inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact) are alleviated and the remedial measures are protective to the workers operating and/or maintaining the site. The risk evaluation process included a preliminary risk assessment (Tier 1) based on a comparison with pertinent soil cleanup criteria, a prioritization analysis to rank zones, chemicals and pathways of concern, and an application of the Risk Based Corrective Action (RBCA) approach (Tier 2) for construction worker exposure scenario. The risk assessment identified selected areas that would benefit from remedial actions. Prioritization Analysis classified the site into five high-priority (comprising 97% of the total health-based risk), three medium-priority (contributing to remaining 2 to 3% of the risk), and adequately protected areas. The boundaries and volumes of affected areas were delineated based on confirmatory soil sampling and statistical analyses. The remedial technologies selected for the site have achieved appropriate reduction in risk to comply with all State regulations and include (in addition to the institutional controls): • Capping the site where only immobilesemivolatile contaminants are present • Excavation and on-site treatment of the soils impacted by volatile organic com pounds through ex situ low temperature desorption, or alternative “biopile” treatment and natural attenuation, and • Excavation and off-site disposal of limited volumes of soils This risk-based, integral approach helped identify the real significance of contamination present at the site and facilitated the development of suitable and adequate remedies. Had not it been for this approach, the mere comparison with soil cleanup criteria would have unnecessarily resulted in denoting all areas as nuisance contributors, and thus requiring some actions. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has approved this approach and contributed to its accomplishment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的工业场地土壤修复分区策略
在项目的早期阶段确定新泽西化学制造基地的未来土地使用仍然是工业性质后,该基地根据风险进行了分区。现场的关注化学品包括相对较低水平的单核和多核芳烃、氯化脂肪族以及其他挥发性和半挥发性化合物。人类直接接触情景是减轻与土壤有关的风险的关键,因为地下水迁移途径已经因地下水恢复而中断。制定了一项重点补救策略,以确保减轻暴露途径(吸入、摄入和皮肤接触),并确保补救措施对操作和/或维护现场的工人具有保护作用。风险评估过程包括基于与相关土壤清理标准比较的初步风险评估(第1级),对区域、化学品和关注途径进行优先级分析,以及对建筑工人暴露情景应用基于风险的纠正措施(RBCA)方法(第2级)。风险评估确定了将受益于补救行动的选定领域。优先级分析将该遗址分为5个高优先级(占全部健康风险的97%)、3个中等优先级(占剩余风险的2%至3%)和充分保护的区域。根据验证性土壤取样和统计分析,划定了受影响区域的边界和面积。为该地点选择的补救技术已适当降低了风险,以符合所有国家条例,并包括(除机构控制外):•通过非原位低温解吸或替代“生物堆”处理和自然衰减,挖掘和现场处理受挥发性有机肥料影响的土壤,以及•挖掘和场外处理有限数量的土壤,这是基于风险的,综合办法有助于查明现场存在的污染的真正意义,并促进制定适当和充分的补救办法。如果不是采用这种方法,仅仅与土壤清理标准进行比较就会不必要地导致把所有地区都列为造成滋扰的地区,从而需要采取一些行动。新泽西州环境保护部(NJDEP)批准了这一方法,并为其实现作出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1