Nullity in Public Law: Two Recent Supreme Court Judgments

A. Vaughan, Michael Spencer
{"title":"Nullity in Public Law: Two Recent Supreme Court Judgments","authors":"A. Vaughan, Michael Spencer","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.2034349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In two recent judgments the Supreme Court has grappled with the concept of nullity in public law. TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department concerned whether a tribunal decision, which was taken pursuant to inherently unfair and ultra vires procedure rules, was for that reason a nullity. In Majera v Secretary of State for the Home Department the Court considered whether the Home Office could lawfully act in a manner which was inconsistent with a defective tribunal bail order, without first obtaining variation, setting aside or quashing of the order. The Supreme Court answered both questions in the negative. In doing so, it has reaffirmed and clarified certain fundamental principles in relation to the concept of nullity and invalidity in public law.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.2034349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. In two recent judgments the Supreme Court has grappled with the concept of nullity in public law. TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department concerned whether a tribunal decision, which was taken pursuant to inherently unfair and ultra vires procedure rules, was for that reason a nullity. In Majera v Secretary of State for the Home Department the Court considered whether the Home Office could lawfully act in a manner which was inconsistent with a defective tribunal bail order, without first obtaining variation, setting aside or quashing of the order. The Supreme Court answered both questions in the negative. In doing so, it has reaffirmed and clarified certain fundamental principles in relation to the concept of nullity and invalidity in public law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公法中的无效:两个最近的最高法院判决
1. 在最近的两项判决中,最高法院一直在努力解决公法中的无效概念。TN(越南)诉内政部国务秘书一案,涉及根据固有的不公平和越权程序规则作出的法庭裁决是否因此而无效。在Majera诉内政部国务秘书一案中,法院考虑内政部是否可以合法地采取与有缺陷的法庭保释令不一致的方式,而无需首先获得变更、撤销或撤销该命令。最高法院对这两个问题的回答都是否定的。在这样做的过程中,它重申和澄清了与公法中无效和无效概念有关的某些基本原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1