Econometric approaches in evaluating costs and outcomes within pharmacoeconomic analyses

G. Skrepnek, E. Olvey, A. Sahai
{"title":"Econometric approaches in evaluating costs and outcomes within pharmacoeconomic analyses","authors":"G. Skrepnek, E. Olvey, A. Sahai","doi":"10.3233/PPL-2011-0345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cost and outcomes data within pharmacoeconomic analyses often possess distributional properties that require advanced statistical approaches to yield robust findings. An analyst’s failure to recognize and control for these characteristics may result in inappropriate evaluations of statistical associations or causal effects which may ultimately support incorrect policy decisionmaking. Given the importance of appropriate analysis and interpretation in pharmacoeconomics, the purpose of this paper is to address the more common statistical issues encountered in assessing healthcare costs or outcomes, emphasizing approaches that may be employed to analyze these data. More specifically, statistical methods used commonly with retrospective cohort analyses are presented including least squares (e.g., ordinary least squares, OLS), logarithmic transformations, log-plus-constant models, two-part models, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), and generalized linear models (GLM) and extensions, among others.","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2011-0345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Cost and outcomes data within pharmacoeconomic analyses often possess distributional properties that require advanced statistical approaches to yield robust findings. An analyst’s failure to recognize and control for these characteristics may result in inappropriate evaluations of statistical associations or causal effects which may ultimately support incorrect policy decisionmaking. Given the importance of appropriate analysis and interpretation in pharmacoeconomics, the purpose of this paper is to address the more common statistical issues encountered in assessing healthcare costs or outcomes, emphasizing approaches that may be employed to analyze these data. More specifically, statistical methods used commonly with retrospective cohort analyses are presented including least squares (e.g., ordinary least squares, OLS), logarithmic transformations, log-plus-constant models, two-part models, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), and generalized linear models (GLM) and extensions, among others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计量经济学方法在药物经济学分析中评估成本和结果
药物经济学分析中的成本和结果数据通常具有分布特性,需要先进的统计方法才能产生可靠的发现。分析人员未能识别和控制这些特征可能导致统计关联或因果效应的不适当评估,最终可能支持不正确的政策决策。鉴于药物经济学中适当的分析和解释的重要性,本文的目的是解决在评估医疗成本或结果时遇到的更常见的统计问题,强调可能用于分析这些数据的方法。更具体地说,介绍了回顾性队列分析中常用的统计方法,包括最小二乘(例如,普通最小二乘,OLS)、对数变换、对数加常数模型、两部分模型、最大似然估计(MLE)、广义线性模型(GLM)和扩展等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cross-border healthcare and recognition of medical prescriptions issued in another Member State Political and regulatory key factors of transparency and independence in terms of vaccination in Spain: Information, participation and lobbies Compulsory licensing: Procedural requirements under the TRIPS agreement Breaking New Ground: The WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation: Potential and Perspectives for the Pharmaceutical Industry Editorial - The innovation and access to landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1