Efficient probabilistic fault tree analysis of safety critical systems via probabilistic model checking

Marwan Ammar, Ghaith Bany Hamad, O. Mohamed, Y. Savaria
{"title":"Efficient probabilistic fault tree analysis of safety critical systems via probabilistic model checking","authors":"Marwan Ammar, Ghaith Bany Hamad, O. Mohamed, Y. Savaria","doi":"10.1109/FDL.2016.7880373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cost and complexity involved in the development of critical systems encourage the use of reliability assessment techniques as early in the design cycle as possible. Existing techniques often lack the capacity to perform a comprehensive and exhaustive analysis on complex redundant architectures, leading to less than optimal risk evaluation. This paper addresses these weaknesses by 1) proposing a new probabilistic modeling of Fault Tree gates and their composition as Markov Decision Processes; 2) developing a new formal-based technique to perform an in-depth verification of the system’s reliability. This technique makes use of the expressiveness of fault trees and the power of probabilistic model checking in order to investigate the best Triple Modular Redundancy partitioning and configuration of a system. The presented approach greatly improves the overall scalability with respect to other techniques, while also improving the accuracy of the results. For example, we can provide probabilistic failure rates for a chain of 100 redundant components in little over one second.","PeriodicalId":137305,"journal":{"name":"2016 Forum on Specification and Design Languages (FDL)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Forum on Specification and Design Languages (FDL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FDL.2016.7880373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The cost and complexity involved in the development of critical systems encourage the use of reliability assessment techniques as early in the design cycle as possible. Existing techniques often lack the capacity to perform a comprehensive and exhaustive analysis on complex redundant architectures, leading to less than optimal risk evaluation. This paper addresses these weaknesses by 1) proposing a new probabilistic modeling of Fault Tree gates and their composition as Markov Decision Processes; 2) developing a new formal-based technique to perform an in-depth verification of the system’s reliability. This technique makes use of the expressiveness of fault trees and the power of probabilistic model checking in order to investigate the best Triple Modular Redundancy partitioning and configuration of a system. The presented approach greatly improves the overall scalability with respect to other techniques, while also improving the accuracy of the results. For example, we can provide probabilistic failure rates for a chain of 100 redundant components in little over one second.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于概率模型检验的安全关键系统高效概率故障树分析
关键系统开发所涉及的成本和复杂性鼓励在设计周期中尽可能早地使用可靠性评估技术。现有的技术通常缺乏对复杂的冗余架构执行全面和详尽的分析的能力,从而导致不太理想的风险评估。本文提出了一种新的故障树门的概率模型,并将其组成为马尔可夫决策过程;2)开发一种新的基于形式的技术,对系统的可靠性进行深入验证。该技术利用故障树的表达性和概率模型检查的能力来研究系统的最佳三模冗余划分和配置。相对于其他技术,所提出的方法大大提高了整体可伸缩性,同时也提高了结果的准确性。例如,我们可以在一秒钟多一点的时间内提供100个冗余组件链的概率故障率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using event-B and Modelica to evaluate thermal management strategies in many core systems IP-XACT for smart systems design: extensions for the integration of functional and extra-functional models Maintenance of specification models in industry using Edapt A modular design space exploration framework for multiprocessor real-time systems Building product-lines of mixed-criticality systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1