Analyzing OpenAPI Specifications for Security Design Issues

C. Cheh, Binbin Chen
{"title":"Analyzing OpenAPI Specifications for Security Design Issues","authors":"C. Cheh, Binbin Chen","doi":"10.1109/SecDev51306.2021.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern web and mobile applications rely on an ever increasing set of services defined by their respective API (Application Programming Interface) specifications. The complexity of today’s APIs, in terms of scale and inter-dependency, poses a challenge for security analyses as it requires much manual effort to conduct a check for design flaws. In this work, we leverage the standardized OpenAPI specification as input and propose a semi-automatic approach to infer various key information about that API specification’s security issues. Our case study based on the OpenAPI specification of the Open Bank Project (consisting of 304 API calls and 402 data fields) shows that our approach can: 1) identify sensitive and insensitive data fields, 2) identify insecure or high-risk API calls that may leak sensitive data, and 3) calculate the exposure level of each data field and API call. In particular, we identified 31 sensitive data fields, 29 insufficiently protected API calls that access a subset of those sensitive data, and 34 high-risk API calls that may result in sensitive data exposure. Furthermore, our exposure level calculation shows that transactions-related fields generally have higher exposure level, hence requiring more scrutiny.","PeriodicalId":154122,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Secure Development Conference (SecDev)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Secure Development Conference (SecDev)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SecDev51306.2021.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Modern web and mobile applications rely on an ever increasing set of services defined by their respective API (Application Programming Interface) specifications. The complexity of today’s APIs, in terms of scale and inter-dependency, poses a challenge for security analyses as it requires much manual effort to conduct a check for design flaws. In this work, we leverage the standardized OpenAPI specification as input and propose a semi-automatic approach to infer various key information about that API specification’s security issues. Our case study based on the OpenAPI specification of the Open Bank Project (consisting of 304 API calls and 402 data fields) shows that our approach can: 1) identify sensitive and insensitive data fields, 2) identify insecure or high-risk API calls that may leak sensitive data, and 3) calculate the exposure level of each data field and API call. In particular, we identified 31 sensitive data fields, 29 insufficiently protected API calls that access a subset of those sensitive data, and 34 high-risk API calls that may result in sensitive data exposure. Furthermore, our exposure level calculation shows that transactions-related fields generally have higher exposure level, hence requiring more scrutiny.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析安全设计问题的OpenAPI规范
现代web和移动应用程序依赖于由它们各自的API(应用程序编程接口)规范定义的不断增加的服务集。就规模和相互依赖性而言,当今api的复杂性对安全性分析提出了挑战,因为它需要大量的手工工作来检查设计缺陷。在这项工作中,我们利用标准化的OpenAPI规范作为输入,并提出了一种半自动方法来推断有关该API规范安全问题的各种关键信息。我们基于开放银行项目的OpenAPI规范(由304个API调用和402个数据字段组成)的案例研究表明,我们的方法可以:1)识别敏感和不敏感的数据字段,2)识别可能泄露敏感数据的不安全或高风险API调用,以及3)计算每个数据字段和API调用的暴露级别。特别是,我们确定了31个敏感数据字段,29个访问这些敏感数据子集的保护不足的API调用,以及34个可能导致敏感数据暴露的高风险API调用。此外,我们的公开级别计算表明,与交易相关的字段通常具有更高的公开级别,因此需要更多的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hands-on Tutorial: How Exploitable is Insecure C Code? Towards Improving Container Security by Preventing Runtime Escapes Automated Threat Analysis and Management in a Continuous Integration Pipeline [Title page i] Compressing Network Attack Surfaces for Practical Security Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1