What Can Program Repair Learn From Code Review?

Madeline Endres, Pemma Reiter, S. Forrest, Westley Weimer
{"title":"What Can Program Repair Learn From Code Review?","authors":"Madeline Endres, Pemma Reiter, S. Forrest, Westley Weimer","doi":"10.1145/3524459.3527352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past fifteen years, research on automated program repair has matured, and transitions to industry have begun. However, an impediment to wider adoption is concern over automatically gen-erated patch correctness. A review of 250 program repair research papers suggests that this concern can be addressed by adapting practices from modern code review, such as multiple anonymized reviews and checklists with well-defined terminology, to better evaluate the correctness and acceptability of plausible patches. In this paper, we argue that adopting such practices from modern code review for automated program repair research can increase developer trust, paving the way for wider industrial deployments.","PeriodicalId":131481,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Automated Program Repair (APR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3524459.3527352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, research on automated program repair has matured, and transitions to industry have begun. However, an impediment to wider adoption is concern over automatically gen-erated patch correctness. A review of 250 program repair research papers suggests that this concern can be addressed by adapting practices from modern code review, such as multiple anonymized reviews and checklists with well-defined terminology, to better evaluate the correctness and acceptability of plausible patches. In this paper, we argue that adopting such practices from modern code review for automated program repair research can increase developer trust, paving the way for wider industrial deployments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
程序修复可以从代码审查中学到什么?
在过去的15年中,对自动化程序修复的研究已经成熟,并且已经开始向工业过渡。然而,更广泛采用的一个障碍是对自动生成的补丁正确性的关注。对250个程序修复研究论文的回顾表明,这个问题可以通过适应现代代码审查的实践来解决,例如多个匿名的审查和具有良好定义术语的检查表,以更好地评估合理补丁的正确性和可接受性。在本文中,我们认为从现代代码审查中采用这种实践来进行自动程序修复研究可以增加开发人员的信任,为更广泛的工业部署铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Language Models Can Prioritize Patches for Practical Program Patching Towards JavaScript program repair with Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-2) Some Automatically Generated Patches are More Likely to be Correct than Others: An Analysis of Defects4J Patch Features Scaling Genetic Improvement and Automated Program Repair Revisiting Object Similarity-based Patch Ranking in Automated Program Repair: An Extensive Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1