Suitability of selection criteria as a measure of outcome of medical graduates: University of Colombo

D. Mettananda, V. Wickramasinghe, J. Kudolugoda, S. Lamabadusuriya, R. Ajanthan, D. Kottahachchi
{"title":"Suitability of selection criteria as a measure of outcome of medical graduates: University of Colombo","authors":"D. Mettananda, V. Wickramasinghe, J. Kudolugoda, S. Lamabadusuriya, R. Ajanthan, D. Kottahachchi","doi":"10.4038/CJMS.V49I1.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A prime obstacle faced by a medical educator is selecting the right student to be trained as a doctor, and the general consensus is that this is also the most difficult task. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of selected outcome measures on outcome performance of medical undergraduates of the University of Colombo. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the performance (marks) of students of 4 batches GCE (A/L) 1993 through to 1996). GCE (A/L) aggregate marks, attempt of entry, district of entry, English language proficiency and sex were tested as predictors of success. Results of main assessments were considered as measures of success. Relationship between outcome measures and outcome predictors were assessed using the multiple logistic regression model. Data of 699 students were analyzed and 82% of students entered from the Colombo district. A higher percentage of first attempters (at GCE A/L) performed well and obtained classes. Entering medical school from first two GCE A/L examination attempts was a significant positive predictor of passing any examination (odds ratio 3.2 to 7.5) or obtaining honors (odds ratio 2.8 to 16.0). Attempt of entry predicted 5.4% of the outcome (pass or fail) in university performance. Correlation between the GCE A / L aggregate mark and the student's position in order of merit for the internship appointments was -0.37 (p<0.001). A combination of factors should be used in the selection process of students to embark on the undergraduate process as any single factor is a poor predictor of outcome of performance. We believe that the number of attempts allowed to sit for GCE A/L in order to gain entry to a medical school as well as other degree courses should be confined to two attempts.","PeriodicalId":253405,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/CJMS.V49I1.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A prime obstacle faced by a medical educator is selecting the right student to be trained as a doctor, and the general consensus is that this is also the most difficult task. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of selected outcome measures on outcome performance of medical undergraduates of the University of Colombo. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the performance (marks) of students of 4 batches GCE (A/L) 1993 through to 1996). GCE (A/L) aggregate marks, attempt of entry, district of entry, English language proficiency and sex were tested as predictors of success. Results of main assessments were considered as measures of success. Relationship between outcome measures and outcome predictors were assessed using the multiple logistic regression model. Data of 699 students were analyzed and 82% of students entered from the Colombo district. A higher percentage of first attempters (at GCE A/L) performed well and obtained classes. Entering medical school from first two GCE A/L examination attempts was a significant positive predictor of passing any examination (odds ratio 3.2 to 7.5) or obtaining honors (odds ratio 2.8 to 16.0). Attempt of entry predicted 5.4% of the outcome (pass or fail) in university performance. Correlation between the GCE A / L aggregate mark and the student's position in order of merit for the internship appointments was -0.37 (p<0.001). A combination of factors should be used in the selection process of students to embark on the undergraduate process as any single factor is a poor predictor of outcome of performance. We believe that the number of attempts allowed to sit for GCE A/L in order to gain entry to a medical school as well as other degree courses should be confined to two attempts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为衡量医学毕业生成果的选择标准的适用性:科伦坡大学
医学教育者面临的一个主要障碍是选择合适的学生来训练成为一名医生,普遍的共识是这也是最困难的任务。本研究旨在评估选定的结局指标对科伦坡大学医学本科生结局表现的影响。采用回顾性队列研究方法,对1993 ~ 1996年四批学生的GCE (A/L)成绩(分数)进行研究。GCE (A/L)总分、入学尝试、入学地区、英语语言能力和性别被测试为成功的预测因素。主要评估的结果被视为成功的衡量标准。使用多元逻辑回归模型评估结果测量和结果预测因子之间的关系。对699名学生的数据进行了分析,82%的学生来自科伦坡地区。第一次尝试者的较高百分比(在GCE A/L)表现良好并获得了课程。从前两次GCE A/L考试进入医学院是通过任何考试(优势比3.2到7.5)或获得荣誉(优势比2.8到16.0)的显著正预测因子。入学尝试预测了大学成绩(及格或不及格)的5.4%。GCE A / L总分与学生在实习岗位的择优排序之间的相关性为-0.37 (p<0.001)。在选择学生进入本科阶段的过程中,应该综合考虑多种因素,因为任何单一因素都不能很好地预测学生的表现。我们认为,为了进入医学院和其他学位课程,允许参加普通教育证书A/L考试的次数应限制在两次以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Colombo Medical Congress 2023 - Research Excellence & Beyond: Translating Research into Practice Data and technology driven learning health systems for low and middle income countries Treatment failure in cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sri Lanka – Is it for real? Misinterpretation of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) staging in patients with diabetes: creatinine estimation method as a source of error Supporting affordable healthcare through innovative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1