Prophylactic Effect of Simultaneous Placement of Mesh on Incidence of Parastomal Hernia After Miles' Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Xu Gao, Ruo-fan Li, Li-xin Sun, Zuo-Jun Liu, Guangliang Tian, Huidong Qi, Xiao-Bin Li
{"title":"Prophylactic Effect of Simultaneous Placement of Mesh on Incidence of Parastomal Hernia After Miles' Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Xu Gao, Ruo-fan Li, Li-xin Sun, Zuo-Jun Liu, Guangliang Tian, Huidong Qi, Xiao-Bin Li","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-243315/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nTo assess the prophylactic effect of simultaneous placement of mesh and the incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study included real-world data of 56 surgically resected patients with colorectal cancer who were consecutively assigned to two groups: control (no mesh, n = 32) and experimental (received mesh, n = 24). An artificial patch was placed under the tunica vaginalis of rectus abdominis for patients in the experimental group, whereas those in the control group received routine sigmoidostomy. The median follow-up time was >20 mo. The difference in hazards function was analyzed by cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meir analysis was used to determine the survival curves. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe postoperative incidence rate of PSH was lower in the experimental (41.7%) group than in the control group (71.9%; P = 0.045). The PSH postoperative time in the experimental group was significantly delayed compared to the control group (48 mo versus 10 mo; P < 0.001). The risk of progression from H1 to H2 was less in the experimental group compared to the control group (49.28% versus 60.86%; P = 0.14).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nProphylactic mesh placement significantly prolonged postoperative time for the recurrence of PSH. The incidence of recurrence of H2 (severe PSH) requiring secondary surgical repair was also reduced.","PeriodicalId":191568,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of surgical research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-243315/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To assess the prophylactic effect of simultaneous placement of mesh and the incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer. METHODS This study included real-world data of 56 surgically resected patients with colorectal cancer who were consecutively assigned to two groups: control (no mesh, n = 32) and experimental (received mesh, n = 24). An artificial patch was placed under the tunica vaginalis of rectus abdominis for patients in the experimental group, whereas those in the control group received routine sigmoidostomy. The median follow-up time was >20 mo. The difference in hazards function was analyzed by cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meir analysis was used to determine the survival curves. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS The postoperative incidence rate of PSH was lower in the experimental (41.7%) group than in the control group (71.9%; P = 0.045). The PSH postoperative time in the experimental group was significantly delayed compared to the control group (48 mo versus 10 mo; P < 0.001). The risk of progression from H1 to H2 was less in the experimental group compared to the control group (49.28% versus 60.86%; P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic mesh placement significantly prolonged postoperative time for the recurrence of PSH. The incidence of recurrence of H2 (severe PSH) requiring secondary surgical repair was also reduced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时放置补片预防Miles结直肠癌术后造口旁疝发生率的前瞻性研究。
前言:探讨同时放置补片的预防效果及腹会阴直肠癌切除术后造口旁疝(PSH)的发生率。方法本研究纳入56例手术切除的结直肠癌患者的真实数据,将其连续分为两组:对照组(未补片,n = 32)和实验组(接受补片,n = 24)。实验组在腹直肌阴道膜下放置人工补片,对照组常规乙状结肠造口术。中位随访时间>20个月。采用cox回归分析危险函数的差异。Kaplan-Meir分析确定生存曲线。P值<0.05为显著性。结果实验组术后PSH发生率(41.7%)低于对照组(71.9%);p = 0.045)。与对照组相比,实验组PSH术后时间明显延迟(48个月vs 10个月;p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,实验组从H1进展为H2的风险较低(49.28%对60.86%;p = 0.14)。结论预防性补片可明显延长PSH术后复发时间。H2(严重PSH)需要二次手术修复的复发率也降低了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel Application of Hydrodissection in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gangrenous Gallbladders. A is for American. Asian. Ally. Applying Behavioral Nudges in a Dietary Comparator for Surgical Trials: Developing the MediDiet Preoperative Anemia is Associated With Postoperative Renal Failure After Elective Open Aortic Repair. A Virtual Tumor Board Platform: A Way to Enhance Decision-Making for Complex Malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1