Outcome of Women with Previous Cesaerian Section At A Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Nepal

A. Agrawal, S. Chhetri, A. Thakur, S. Agrawal, P. Basnet
{"title":"Outcome of Women with Previous Cesaerian Section At A Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Nepal","authors":"A. Agrawal, S. Chhetri, A. Thakur, S. Agrawal, P. Basnet","doi":"10.3126/HREN.V12I1.11980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pregnant women with previous caesarean section are increasing due to the liberal use of caesarean section in first pregnancy due to multifactorial reason. The risks, benefits, and relative safety of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) have been subject of interest for well over 100 years. Thus mutual understanding between the treating obstetrician and patient herself is a core towards achieving good maternal and perinatal outcome considering all the risk and benefit in women with previous caesarean section. Objective: The aim was to analyze the maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnant women with previous caesarean section. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 300 women with singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation with previous one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) having inter pregnancy interval ≥ 18 months presenting at ≥ 37-41 week period of gestation admitted for delivery were enrolled and various maternal and perinatal outcome were noted. Results: Caesarean delivery rate during the study period was 26.95%. Eighty percent of eligible women opted for trial of labor. Successful vaginal birth after caesarean section was 29%. Elective repeat caesarean delivery was 19.66%. The rate of failed VBAC was 51%. Failed VBAC increased with increasing weight of baby. There was no difference in mean birth weight among patient who had successful VBAC, who refused VBAC and who had failed VBAC. Mode of delivery had no significant effect on the number of neonatal intensive care unit admission and number of still births. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v12i1.11980 Health Renaissance 2014;12(1):18-23","PeriodicalId":333216,"journal":{"name":"Health Renaissance","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Renaissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/HREN.V12I1.11980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women with previous caesarean section are increasing due to the liberal use of caesarean section in first pregnancy due to multifactorial reason. The risks, benefits, and relative safety of vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) have been subject of interest for well over 100 years. Thus mutual understanding between the treating obstetrician and patient herself is a core towards achieving good maternal and perinatal outcome considering all the risk and benefit in women with previous caesarean section. Objective: The aim was to analyze the maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnant women with previous caesarean section. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 300 women with singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation with previous one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) having inter pregnancy interval ≥ 18 months presenting at ≥ 37-41 week period of gestation admitted for delivery were enrolled and various maternal and perinatal outcome were noted. Results: Caesarean delivery rate during the study period was 26.95%. Eighty percent of eligible women opted for trial of labor. Successful vaginal birth after caesarean section was 29%. Elective repeat caesarean delivery was 19.66%. The rate of failed VBAC was 51%. Failed VBAC increased with increasing weight of baby. There was no difference in mean birth weight among patient who had successful VBAC, who refused VBAC and who had failed VBAC. Mode of delivery had no significant effect on the number of neonatal intensive care unit admission and number of still births. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v12i1.11980 Health Renaissance 2014;12(1):18-23
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔东部一家三级护理医院既往剖宫产手术妇女的结果
背景:由于多因素原因,首次妊娠时剖宫产术的广泛应用,有剖宫产史的孕妇越来越多。剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的风险、益处和相对安全性已经被关注了100多年。因此,考虑到既往剖腹产妇女的所有风险和益处,治疗产科医生和患者本人之间的相互理解是实现良好的孕产妇和围产期结局的核心。目的:分析有剖宫产史的孕妇的产妇结局和围产儿结局。方法:在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了300例头位单胎妊娠,既往有一次下段剖宫产(LSCS),妊娠间隔≥18个月,妊娠期≥37-41周入院分娩的妇女,并记录了各种产妇和围产期结局。结果:研究期间剖宫产率为26.95%。80%符合条件的妇女选择试产。剖宫产后顺产成功率为29%。选择性重复剖宫产占19.66%。VBAC失败率为51%。VBAC失败随着婴儿体重的增加而增加。在VBAC成功、拒绝和失败的患者中,平均出生体重没有差异。分娩方式对新生儿重症监护病房入院数和死产数无显著影响。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v12i1.11980健康复兴2014;12(1):18-23
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydatid cyst submandibular gland, an unusal presentation: A case report Family presence in emergency: Attitude and belief among emergency health professionals in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal Diffuse parenchymal neurocysticercosis Indications for destructive eye surgeries at tertiary care hospital, eastern Nepal: A five years experience A case of abdominal tuberculosis diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of mesenteric lymph node
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1