Significatio and Senefiance, or Relics in Thomas Aquinas and Jean de Meun

E. J. Richards
{"title":"Significatio and Senefiance, or Relics in Thomas Aquinas and Jean de Meun","authors":"E. J. Richards","doi":"10.5117/9789462985933_ch07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter asks whether Jean de Meun’s references in the Roman de\n la Rose to relics as a euphemism for genitals actually allude to a much\n larger debate in Paris between 1250 and 1280 about significatio in general,\n and about the religious and political significance of relics in particular,\n a debate in which Thomas Aquinas played an important role. Scholars\n have noted the influence of Ovid and Alain de Lille upon the Roman de la\n Rose, but have not tended to consider Jean de Meun’s scholastic sources,\n particularly his deployment of the theology of Thomas Aquinas.","PeriodicalId":403884,"journal":{"name":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Intellectual Dynamism of the High Middle Ages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789462985933_ch07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter asks whether Jean de Meun’s references in the Roman de la Rose to relics as a euphemism for genitals actually allude to a much larger debate in Paris between 1250 and 1280 about significatio in general, and about the religious and political significance of relics in particular, a debate in which Thomas Aquinas played an important role. Scholars have noted the influence of Ovid and Alain de Lille upon the Roman de la Rose, but have not tended to consider Jean de Meun’s scholastic sources, particularly his deployment of the theology of Thomas Aquinas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汤玛斯·阿奎那和让·德·梅恩的意义与神圣,或遗迹
这一章问的是,让·德·梅恩在《玫瑰罗马书》中提到的遗物作为生殖器的委婉说法,是否实际上暗示了1250年到1280年间在巴黎发生的一场更大的关于意义的辩论,特别是关于遗物的宗教和政治意义的辩论,托马斯·阿奎那在这场辩论中发挥了重要作用。学者们注意到奥维德和阿兰·德·里尔对罗马·德拉·罗斯的影响,但没有考虑到让·德·梅恩的学术来源,特别是他对托马斯·阿奎那神学的运用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
12 Attuning to the Cosmos 10 A Sense of Proportion Communities of Learning – Constant J. Mews 6 Dirty Laundry Thomas Becket’s Hair Shirt and the Making of a Saint Carnal Compassion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1